The Briefing Room
General Category => Health/Education => Topic started by: mystery-ak on July 07, 2014, 04:24:33 pm
-
http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/morning-mix/wp/2014/07/07/children-of-same-sex-couples-are-happier-and-healthier-than-peers-research-shows/ (http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/morning-mix/wp/2014/07/07/children-of-same-sex-couples-are-happier-and-healthier-than-peers-research-shows/)
BY LINDSEY BEVER July 7 at 5:48 AM
(http://img.washingtonpost.com/news/morning-mix/wp-content/uploads/sites/21/2014/07/155262987.jpg)
Karine Hallier and her girlfriend Elodie Lucas pose walking with their children on Novembre 1, 2012 at their home in Nantes, western France. The couple had two children by artificial insemination and militate for the rights to same-sex parenting. (JEAN-SEBASTIEN EVRARD/AFP/Getty Images)
Children of same-sex couples fare better when it comes to physical health and social well-being than children in the general population, according to researchers at the University of Melbourne in Australia.
“It’s often suggested that children with same-sex parents have poorer outcomes because they’re missing a parent of a particular sex. But research my colleagues and I published in the journal BMC Public Health shows this isn’t the case,” lead researcher Simon Crouch wrote on the Conversation.
Crouch and his team surveyed 315 same-sex parents with a total of 500 children across Australia. About 80 percent of the kids had female parents and about 18 percent had male parents, the study states.
Children from same-sex families scored about 6 percent higher on general health and family cohesion, even when controlling for socio-demographic factors such as parents’ education and household income, Crouch wrote. However, on most health measures, including emotional behavior and physical functioning, there was no difference compared with children from the general population.
Crouch suggested the greater social cohesion among same-sex families comes from an equal distribution of work. He said same-sex couples are likely to share responsibilities more equally than heterosexual ones.
“It is liberating for parents to take on roles that suit their skills rather than defaulting to gender stereotypes, where mum is the primary care giver and dad the primary breadwinner,” he said.
But Benjamin Siegel, professor of pediatrics at the Boston University School of Medicine, said there are limits with such research. He told BU Today last year that none of the studies has been a randomized, controlled trial and that all studies on same-sex parenting are small since there aren’t as many same-sex parents.
The University of Melbourne study also pointed out a problem facing same-sex families: stigma.
According to the study, about two-thirds of children with same-sex parents experienced some form of stigma because of their parents’ sexual orientation. Despite these kids’ higher marks in physical health and social well-being, the stigma associated with their family structure was linked to lower scores on a number of scales. Crouch said stigmas ranged from subtle issues such as sending letters home from school addressed to a “Mr.” and “Mrs.” to more harmful problems such as bullying at school. The greater the stigma a same-sex family faces, the greater the impact on a child’s social and emotional well-being, Crouch said.
However, according to a report published by the American Academy of Pediatrics last year that analyzed three decades of data, children raised by gay and lesbian parents showed resilience “with regard to social, psychological and sexual health despite economic and legal disparities and social stigma.”
“Many studies have demonstrated that children’s well-being is affected much more by their relationships with their parents, their parents’ sense of competence and security, and the presence of social and economic support for the family than by the gender or the sexual orientation of their parents,” said Siegel, co-author of the American Academy of Pediatrics report.
Amid the last year’s Supreme Court arguments over same-sex marriage, researchers found that the quality of parenting and families’ economic well-being was more important than sexual orientation.
“I can tell you we’re never going to get the perfect science, but what you have right now is good-enough science,” Siegel said. “The data we have right now are good enough to know what’s good for kids.”
-
none of the studies has been a randomized, controlled trial
Indeed. There is no control in this study, either, and the sample is heavily skewed toward lesbians.
This is agitprop disguised as “science,” designed with the sole purpose of undermining the basic family unit.
-
Riiiiight!
-
Children from same-sex families scored about 6 percent higher on general health and family cohesion, even when controlling for socio-demographic factors such as parents’ education and household income, Crouch wrote. However, on most health measures, including emotional behavior and physical functioning, there was no difference compared with children from the general population.
Crouch suggested the greater social cohesion among same-sex families comes from an equal distribution of work. He said same-sex couples are likely to share responsibilities more equally than heterosexual ones.
“It is liberating for parents to take on roles that suit their skills rather than defaulting to gender stereotypes, where mum is the primary care giver and dad the primary breadwinner,” he said.
Confirmation bias. The fact of the matter is that same-sex parents are almost always individuals from the upper middle class and therefore wealthier than average, better educated than average, and otherwise possessed of an above-average supply of the resources, material and parental, that make for more successful children. In other words, this has precious little to do with same-sex versus different-sex parents are almost everything to do with socio-economic status.
-
Is it possible something as simple as the fact these kids are actually wanted by the parents?
A better comparison study would by children of same sex couples - confine it to lesbian couples - and children of heterosexual couples conceived by IVF or sperm donation. I am betting there would be no difference whatsoever in those two cases.
-
Is it possible something as simple as the fact these kids are actually wanted by the parents?
A better comparison study would by children of same sex couples - confine it to lesbian couples - and children of heterosexual couples conceived by IVF or sperm donation. I am betting there would be no difference whatsoever in those two cases.
that along with the aforementioned socio-economic factors.
-
This study was done by a homosexual raising kids with his "partner."
It is also based on interviews with the adults (I will not call them parents) and not the kids so it is basically their opinion of how the kids are doing.
Biased and clearly agenda driven.