Recent Posts

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 ... 10
1
Thomas Tatum
@JackSmart007
·
19h
Breaking! Newly released #january6th footage reveals the @CapitolPolice
 cameras were tracking Ray Epps! @HelpStopHate


https://twitter.com/JackSmart007/status/1783920869582020997
2
Do you have a link to the English translation?

You can find one at the EPA, I'm sure. 000hehehehe
3
Politics/Government / Re: Political Graphics 2024
« Last post by Right_in_Virginia on Today at 01:23:49 pm »
4
Only if they buy electric vehicles.
5
Climate change won't cost them.  If something doesn't exist, it can't cost.  However, the government's misdirected reactions to the scam will. ****slapping
6
RFKjr must be taking votes from Trump now...
7
Climate Change / Climate Change Could Cost Young Americans $500,000
« Last post by rangerrebew on Today at 01:19:41 pm »
 
Climate Change Could Cost Young Americans $500,000
© Provided by Climate Crisis 247

It is always absurd to forecast the effects of climate change more than a few years into the future. Scientists collect new data and publish results almost daily. Global warming targets get missed, and public policy changes. However, climate change could cost a person born this year a total of nearly $500,000 throughout their lifetimes.
 
Consumer Reports commissioned a survey which showed, “The costs from climate change could add up to nearly $500,000 for a baby born in the U.S. in 2024 over their lifetime, when you consider the impact on their cost of living and income, if climate change continues to increase at its current pace.” Much of these costs are energy, food, and healthcare.

The study’s areas for improvement include that it is much too early to say whether climate change will cause inflation. The costs of some things, such as real estate, could fall in some of America’s most famous cities and regions. In theory, energy prices could fall if alternative energy ounces become a low-cost reality.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/markets/climate-change-could-cost-young-americans-500-000/ar-AA1nLvXa?ocid=msedgntp&pc=HCTS&cvid=ded8cc77642d4389fdd4a1a4d0041586&ei=92
8
Sports/Entertainment/MSM/Social Media / Re: Baseball 2024
« Last post by Polly Ticks on Today at 01:18:03 pm »
I heard on the broadcast last night that Marcell Ozuna is on pace for 220 RBIs this year.  I'm pretty sure that's not actually going to happen, but can you imagine?

9
 Trump slams RFK Jr. in latest social media rant: ‘Wasted protest vote’
by Tara Suter - 04/26/24 11:06 PM ET

Former President Trump came out swinging against independent presidential candidate Robert F. Kennedy Jr. Friday, despite weeks of amping him up over his likely November rival, President Biden.

In a series of post on Truth Social, Trump suggested Kennedy was put in the race to help Biden win reelection and claimed his running mate, Nichole Shanahan, is not a serious candidate.

“RFK Jr. is a Democrat ‘Plant,’ a Radical Left Liberal who’s been put in place in order to help Crooked Joe Biden, the Worst President in the History of the United States, get Re-Elected,” Trump wrote, adding “A Vote for Junior’ would essentially be a WASTED PROTEST VOTE, that could swing either way, but would only swing against the Democrats if Republicans knew the true story about him.”

In what seems like a reversal of previous comments, he signaled that he would even take Biden over Kennedy. Last month, the former president touted the long-shot candidate’s campaign as “great for MAGA,” referring to the “Make America Great Again” slogan he often uses.

“RFK Jr. is the most Radical Left Candidate in the race, by far. He’s a big fan of the Green New Scam, and other economy killing disasters,” Trump wrote at the time. “I guess this would mean he is going to be taking votes from Crooked Joe Biden, which would be a great service to America.”

“It’s great for MAGA, but the Communists will make it very hard for him to get on the Ballot,” he added in March.

more
https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/4625372-trump-rfk-jr-truth-social-rant-protest-vote-2024-presidential-election/
10
 
Media Outlets Are Misrepresenting Crime Stats To Biden’s Benefit
© Tampa Free Press

Two of the federal government’s methods of measuring crime tell two different stories, complicating recent claims from the media and President Joe Biden that crime is declining.

Numerous media outlets have, in recent months, run headlines suggesting that crime is declining across the country. The statistics they’re citing, however, don’t tell the entire story.
 
The federal government has two ways of measuring crime, the Bureau of Justice Statistics’ National Crime Victimization Survey (NCVS) and the Federal Bureau of Investigation’s (FBI) Uniform Crime Reporting (UCR) program. The former asks around 240,000 Americans if they’ve been the victim of a crime in the last year whereas the latter relies on crimes reported to police in a given year and shared with the bureau.
 
A gap has emerged between the two measures. More people are telling the Bureau of Justice Statistics that they’ve been victimized, but the FBI is reporting fewer crimes.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/crime/media-outlets-are-misrepresenting-crime-stats-to-biden-s-benefit/ar-AA1nIB5G?ocid=msedgntp&pc=HCTS&cvid=ded8cc77642d4389fdd4a1a4d0041586&ei=86
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 ... 10