The Briefing Room
General Category => Politics/Government => Topic started by: libertybele on August 14, 2018, 01:48:17 am
-
After Strzok firing, Trump says Clinton investigation should be ‘redone’
In tweets celebrating news that FBI agent Peter Strzok was fired from the FBI Monday, President Donald Trump called for the reopening of the Hillary Clinton email investigation, declaring the original investigation led by Strzok a “total fraud.â€
Agent Peter Strzok was just fired from the FBI – finally. The list of bad players in the FBI & DOJ gets longer & longer. Based on the fact that Strzok was in charge of the Witch Hunt, will it be dropped? It is a total Hoax. No Collusion, No Obstruction – I just fight back!
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) August 1
...........An earlier draft of Comey’s statement used stronger language, saying Clinton had been “grossly negligent†— a term that would have carried legal meaning under the Espionage Act. In July 2018 congressional testimony, Strzok admitted that metadata shows that Comey’s statement was edited in June 2016 on his computer, but he claimed he cannot remember making the edit...........
.........The Espionage Act states that if an individual “through gross negligence†permits classified information “to be removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of his trust, or to be lost, stolen, abstracted, or destroyed†he or she “shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both.â€
https://www.conservativereview.com/news/after-strzok-firing-trump-says-clinton-investigation-should-be-redone/ (https://www.conservativereview.com/news/after-strzok-firing-trump-says-clinton-investigation-should-be-redone/)
-
Yes, it does, and I'm glad to see him saying this. Let's hope it is followed by action.
-
AG Sessions, upon waking from slumber, COULD order the Clinton email scandal, be reopened.
Right?
Is he recused from everything, or just Russia collusion in 2016 election?
Does anybody here Know? (or care?)
-
Mark Levin should be the lead investigator and Michael Flynn should be his assistant. :laugh:
So says, both Joe DiGenova with Larry O'Connor today.
They both think Levin would be fair to a fault.
http://www.wmal.com/ (http://www.wmal.com/)
-
AG Sessions, upon waking from slumber, COULD order the Clinton email scandal, be reopened.
Right?
Is he recused from everything, or just Russia collusion in 2016 election?
Does anybody here Know? (or care?)
I understand that the Russia thing is the only thing he has recused himself from. And, yes, I care.
-
...they both said the DOJ and FBI leadership has been corrupted and not able to conduct the investigation, so they'd need to "go outside".
-
I am marinating two of these bad boys now, to throw on the pit later.
(http://youronestophalalshop.com/images/BEEF%20TBONE%20PORTERHOUSE2.jpg)
-
AG Sessions, upon waking from slumber, COULD order the Clinton email scandal, be reopened.
Right?
Is he recused from everything, or just Russia collusion in 2016 election?
Does anybody here Know? (or care?)
I don't know but I do care. Sessions should try and find his backbone wherever he stashed it.
-
@libertybele
The actual FACT is that they don't need to investigate anything! All that needs to happen is to put the language in the report back to what it said originally before the now fired Peter Strozk altered It and get it before a grand jury somewhere outside the Clinton safe zone.
-
A couple of days ago, I heard the FBI only looked at the Clinton email situation, reluctantly when the NYPD was hot on the Uma-Anthony Wiener laptop data discovery.
So look they did, yet Strzok changed the lingo, Comey dismissed it bassed on taking on the role, of the AG etc.
Did Lynch/Clinton commit obstruction or collusion?
What did Obama know, and when did he know? And what did he order done, about any of it?
These and other questions may never be dealt with, until Sens Sam Ervin and Howard Baker, return from the dead.
-
@libertybele
The actual FACT is that they don't need to investigate anything! All that needs to happen is to put the language in the report back to what it said originally before the now fired Peter Strozk altered It and get it before a grand jury somewhere outside the Clinton safe zone.
I don't know, @Bigun. I'm willing to bet it was a pretty water-down version before Strozk got it.
-
I don't know, @Bigun. I'm willing to bet it was a pretty water-down version before Strozk got it.
@Sanguine
Maybe so but "grossly negligent" with classified materials is quite enough to get the job done regardless.
-
@Sanguine
Maybe so but "grossly negligent" with classified materials is quite enough to get the job done regardless.
I know it's wrong, but I really, really want to see her suffer some consequences for her actions.
-
I know it's wrong, but I really, really want to see her suffer some consequences for her actions.
As far as I'm concerned that is a requirement for this once great republic to survive.
-
I know it's wrong, but I really, really want to see her suffer some consequences for her actions.
Why is it wrong? She is an evil person and should suffer consequences.
-
Why is it wrong? She is an evil person and should suffer consequences.
No, it's wrong for me to hope it happens to her. Or, maybe it isn't.