“One of the reasons of Trump’s surge is attributable to seemingly strong support from the women” added Mukherjee.
Hmm, a poll by CEPEX -- a company that provides services to the oil and gas industry in Alberta Canada? They have decided to conduct a poll, and it's the first poll they've ever done. And it happens to be on the US Presidential poll in PA. I call that really odd. :shrug:
Hmm, a poll by CEPEX -- a company that provides services to the oil and gas industry in Alberta Canada? They have decided to conduct a poll, and it's the first poll they've ever done. And it happens to be on the US Presidential poll in PA. I call that really odd. :shrug:
This article was originally distributed via Newswire.com. Newswire.com, Frankly and this Site make no warranties or representations in connection therewith. If you are affiliated with this page and would like it removed please contact pressreleases@franklyinc.com
The survey contacted around 1,000 registered voters. Results are estimated to be accurate within 7.1 percentage points, 19 times out of 20.]
“One of the reasons of Trump’s surge is attributable to seemingly strong support from the women” added Mukherjee.
The latest Suffolk poll gives Hillary a 20 point lead among women.
7.1% makes it so inaccurate as to not pay attention to
LA Times Daily Tracker Aug 21: Trump 45% Clinton 43%
Trump’s lead is just inside the margin of error
A Favorable Poll for Donald Trump Seems to Have a Problem
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/08/09/upshot/a-favorable-poll-for-donald-trump-has-a-major-problem.html?_r=0
LA Times Daily Tracker Aug 21: Trump 45% Clinton 43%
The dweeb who wrote that piece doesn't look old enough to have voted in 2012, much less provide insight/analysis on how that cycle's voting habits compare to this one. I'll trust the folks at USC instead, thank you.
He does wear 'smart' glasses tho... :laugh:
The "dweeb who wrote that piece" knows more about polling and analyzing polls than you know about why you support Trump.
And yet Cohn's complete "analysis" of the LA Times poll is that its skewed because it weights 2012 voters and according to him 2012 Romney voters are more likely to report they voted for Obama four years later. No data to back that supposition up, and no checking in with the USC research team for validation either.
He admits its a different methodology, but it must be flawed because he doesn't understand it. :shrug:
http://www.cbs8.com/story/32806609/trump-leads-clinton-by-5-points-in-the-key-battleground-state-of-pennsylvania
I read those before. Excellent research on your part and I thank you. :beer:
@AbaraXas is really good at that. When I first started posting seriously early this year, he was so helpful I thought he was like Clippy.
(http://thevarsity.ca/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/Clippy1.jpg)
TomSea wrote:
"Good news, I saw an article too that Connecticut's economy might give the GOP nominee a chance."
Trump probaby has a better chance here than any of the other candidates would have.
That's not saying he'll win.
It IS saying he'll win a larger share of the total vote.
Cruz would have gone nowhere here.
It is all in my memoirs.
(https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon.com/images/I/51t7MLGcS1L.jpg)
BWAAAHAAAHAAAA!!!!@sinkspur
]
This LA Times poll has had Trump leading for six months.
@sinkspur
Let's see what the usual poll takers come up with in Penn. before taking this poll seriously.
(http://i1123.photobucket.com/albums/l545/Baseballdad2/Other/polls%20for%20dummies.png)
Hunting for and picking a favorable poll to make a point is a path to certain failure.
Real Clear Politics, is showing a much different story - using several highly watched polls.
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2016/president/pa/pennsylvania_trump_vs_clinton-5633.html