The biggest improvement will come with the tariffs, because when that happens there will be lots of manufacturing requiring unskilled labor (at fifteen bucks per hour, which will make more money available for the poor to purchase the things they're producing).
don't forget that flying unicorns will provide them with a steady diet of free Skittles too.
Clearly Trump will help the matter, these cities suffer under Democratic leadership.
Clearly Trump will help the matter, these cities suffer under Democratic leadership.
Nothing will change until the Dems are out of control in the inner cities....and only through elections can that happen.
And he's pimping schools in inner cities, which is another expansion of federal authority into what should be a local matter. Trump loves big government and his "new side" is going to make sure he won't be outspent by Hillary.
Trump thinks education is one of the top 3 duties of the federal government.
And he's pimping schools in inner cities, which is another expansion of federal authority into what should be a local matter.
This assertion doesn't hold water. Trump has consistently supported ending common core and returning to local control of schools.
A suggestion that Trump is 'pimping' an expansion of federal authority with respect to public schools rates somewhere between silly and dishonest.
So, how much money should we continue to pump into the inner cities? If we take Detroit as an example, for decades they tried busing and revitalizing downtown areas including the schools and it didn't work. Detroit has been rebuilt multiple times only for it to be torn down multiple times. After billions of dollars Detroit is in shambles. Pumping money into inner city areas alone doesn't work; if the mindset of the people doesn't change. IMHO, Thanks to LBJ's 'Great Society' and the leftist influence in these areas that have promoted and developed a 'give me and I deserve' attitude, along with continued dependency instead of promoting in-dependency; pumping money into these areas is futile. Putting a time frame as to how long one can receive government assistance and job creation and making people independent instead of dependent has a much better chance of working.
Also we have to take into consideration that impact of mass migration into our inner cities...including refugees. Right now, there is talk about the GOP placing an influx of Syrian refugees into Detroit in order to help the economy! Did no one learn from Germany??
http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2015/09/detroit-saved-by-syrian-immigrants-rick-snyder-immigration-gop-213206
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/eli-day/detroit-revitalization-an_b_8529642.html
http://www.freep.com/story/opinion/contributors/2015/07/24/desegregation-detroit-schools/30645637/
http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2013/08/17/us/detroit-decline.html?_r=0
http://www.politico.com/story/2015/11/failing-schools-education-white-house-214332
He has not been consistent at all on those things. In fact he once flip-flopped on common core during a 3-minute speech in which he said "we're keeping common core" after calling it horrendous. lol. He stated that education was one of the top 3 responsibilities of the federal government at a nationally televised townhall or debate or something.
This assertion doesn't hold water. Trump has consistently supported ending common core and returning to local control of schools. Lately he's been talking about school choice which resonates with inner city parents. He's also talked about merit pay, ending tenure, and vouchers.
A suggestion that Trump is 'pimping' an expansion of federal authority with respect to public schools rates somewhere between silly and dishonest.
This assertion doesn't hold water. Trump has consistently supported ending common core and returning to local control of schools. Lately he's been talking about school choice which resonates with inner city parents. He's also talked about merit pay, ending tenure, and vouchers.
A suggestion that Trump is 'pimping' an expansion of federal authority with respect to public schools rates somewhere between silly and dishonest.
Schools are healthcare are functions of the federal government, according to Trump.
...if that can be done changes can happen and maybe without the need for more tax dollars just better management and less corruption...
Trump has been consistently against Common Core, it's been a staple of his campaign rhetoric.
You must have been hallucinating when you heard that.
Nothing will change until the Dems are out of control in the inner cities....and only through elections can that happen.
Trump has been consistently against Common Core, it's been a staple of his campaign rhetoric.
You must have been hallucinating when you heard that.
This assertion doesn't hold water. Trump has consistently supported ending common core and returning to local control of schools. Lately he's been talking about school choice which resonates with inner city parents. He's also talked about merit pay, ending tenure, and vouchers.
A suggestion that Trump is 'pimping' an expansion of federal authority with respect to public schools rates somewhere between silly and dishonest.
The Federal government is already heavily involved in the nations schools, Trump is looking to reduce that role significantly.
Eliminating Common Core would be a big step in that direction.
Ending teacher tenure would be another.
To make a claim that he, as President, would work to end Common Core, IS in violation of the Federal law which forbids Federal interference with State school curricula, IS an expansion of Federal authority, and a violation of the principles of Federalism involved in the creation and voluntary adoption of Common Core by participating States.
The Federal government is already heavily involved in the nations schools, Trump is looking to reduce that role significantly.
Eliminating Common Core would be a big step in that direction.
Ending teacher tenure would be another.
Do you even read what you write? First you say Trump is looking to reduce the fed's role in schools.
In the very next sentence you say he wants to end Common Core and teacher tenure, which would be increasing the fed role in local schools.
Well...I don't believe that nonsense for one second.
Ted Cruz on repealing Common Core: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZzjCTHB_piU#t=32 (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZzjCTHB_piU#t=32)
Whatever State it is that you live in can refuse to accept Federal funding of its schools.
Ending Common Core is not increasing the role of the Federal government in schools. That's just Bushshit.
I'd rather demand the Federal government get out of school funding business, seems easier to go after the pusher than the addict.
Ending Common Core is not increasing the role of the Federal government in schools. That's just Bushshit.
How can you argue that having the Federal government force a State to end Program that the State adopted voluntarily be anything BUT a violation of the principles of Federalism and of the applicable Federal laws which forbid the Federal government from interfering with the States decision on school curriculum choices?
Then demand that your State refuse Federal funding. It is not mandatory to accept it.
Question is, why is Trump trying so hard at this late stage in the election process to capture the black and inner city vote which will vote Democrat no matter how much effort is applied? Perhaps he has already tapped out the conservative vote giving up on the NeverTumps
Clearly Trump will help the matter, these cities suffer under Democratic leadership.
Nothing you've written is required to get rid of Common Core.
All the Federal government have to do is stop providing incentives to those states who adopt it and Common Core will die a natural death.
Question is, why is Trump trying so hard at this late stage in the election process to capture the black and inner city vote which will vote Democrat no matter how much effort is applied?
Because he's speaking the truth ... and doing what no Republican POTUS candidate has had the guts to do--asking for their vote--asking for them to turn away from the leadership that has caused so many of the inner city's problems and choose new leadership.
The question for me is: Why are you not cheering him on? Haven't we wanted a candidate to do just this for years?
Because he's speaking the truth ... and doing what no Republican POTUS candidate has had the guts to do--asking for their vote--asking for them to turn away from the leadership that has caused so many of the inner city's problems and choose new leadership.
The question for me is: Why are you not cheering him on? Haven't we wanted a candidate to do just this for years?
He has not been consistent at all on those things. In fact he once flip-flopped on common core during a 3-minute speech in which he said "we're keeping common core" after calling it horrendous. lol. He stated that education was one of the top 3 responsibilities of the federal government at a nationally televised townhall or debate or something.
He has been consistent on nothing.
Whatever State it is that you live in can refuse to accept Federal funding of its schools. It is not mandatory to accept it. Demand that your State stop accepting Federal money.
Congress and President should end the federal funding of schools, period
Congress and President should end the federal funding of schools, period
What does the president have to do with it? Congress is the one who appropriates federal funds last I heard.
What does the president have to do with it? Congress is the one who appropriates federal funds last I heard.
Ask McConnell who went to bat for ObamaCare and spent more effort fighting Cruz efforts to defund it than he or Boehner ever fought against Obama. WHy? Basically McConnell was saying they could not defund ObamaCare because of Obama.
McConnell was absolutely right in saying that they could not defund Obamacare because of Obama's veto
What does the president have to do with it? Congress is the one who appropriates federal funds last I heard.
So they should not try. Right. They should not even attempt to get a compromise out of Obama, I guess.
The way McConnell and Bonehead fought for ObamaCare should never be forgiven.
Getting your State to stop accepting Federal funding is a far easier fight to win, which i the process diminishes the Feds' power over the States by strengthening the State's power over the Feds .
What's there to forgive? They both recognized they didn't have the votes.
That's the mistake Cruz made. Thinking Obama was going to compromise on Obamacare was nothing but political opportunism by Cruz.
What's there to forgive? They both recognized they didn't have the votes.
That's the mistake Cruz made. Thinking Obama was going to compromise on Obamacare was nothing but political opportunism by Cruz.
Complete nonsense of course...its much harder for state governments to stop taking federal funds and difficult to resist taking them in the first place.
Ask Kasich...if you can get him to stop eating