The Briefing Room
General Category => Trump Legal Investigations => Topic started by: rangerrebew on July 20, 2019, 01:27:28 pm
-
Report: Ilhan Omar used false name to enter U.S.
New claim amid growing evidence she married brother in immigration scheme
An investigative reporter who has helped compile compelling evidence that Rep. Ilhan Omar, D-Minn., committed immigration fraud by marrying her brother and lying about it under oath now cites multiple sources within the Minneapolis Somali community who claim the congresswoman entered the United States in 1995 as a fraudulent member of the Omar family.
In other words, her real name is not Omar, reports David Steinberg for Alpha News.
Steinberg, who was New York City Editor at PJ Media from 2009-2019, writes that there is now “probable cause to investigate Omar for eight instances of perjury, immigration fraud, marriage fraud, up to eight years of state and federal tax fraud, two years of federal student loan fraud, and even bigamy.â€
“To be clear: The facts describe perhaps the most extensive spree of illegal misconduct committed by a House member in American history.â€
https://mobile.wnd.com/2019/07/report-ilhan-omar-used-false-name-to-enter-u-s/
-
To be clear: The facts describe perhaps the most extensive spree of illegal misconduct committed by a House member in American history.
Omar is just chock full 'o firsts.
-
So?
Nothing will come of it.
-
So?
Nothing will come of it.
Of course there'll be no charges. She's a rat of color.
But the party will quietly show her the door. She's becoming a liability.
-
Of course there'll be no charges. She's a rat of color.
But the party will quietly show her the door. She's becoming a liability.
There can be no "quietly." She'll make Omarosa Manigault look positively calm when it comes time to pry her from that office.
-
There can be no "quietly." She'll make Omarosa Manigault look positively calm when it comes time to pry her from that office.
She may be shrieking like a harpy but I'll bet she'll never lose that inappropriate smile.
-
She may be shrieking like a harpy but I'll bet she'll never lose that inappropriate smile.
I'm cool with both parts of that. She'll have a pretty smile for her booking photo.
-
Spotty driving record:
https://m.theepochtimes.com/rep-ilhan-omars-republican-opponent-raises-concerns-about-pattern-of-traffic-violations_3008977.html
-
So?
Nothing will come of it.
Unfortunately.
-
I'm cool with both parts of that. She'll have a pretty smile for her booking photo.
The smile makes her look a little smug in these types of photos @Cyber Liberty This is from her 2013 arrest for trespassing:
(https://alphanewsmn.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/Untitled-design-3-1.png)
https://alphanewsmn.com/ilhan-omar-arrested-in-2013-for-trespassing-booked-at-hennepin-county-jail/
-
Steinberg, who was New York City Editor at PJ Media from 2009-2019, writes that there is now “probable cause to investigate Omar for eight instances of perjury, immigration fraud, marriage fraud, up to eight years of state and federal tax fraud, two years of federal student loan fraud, and even bigamy.â€
In a left wing district? She just clinched her re-election.
-
Omar was born in October, 1982, and entered the US in 1992. Her family was granted asylum in 1995. IOW, at most she was 10 years old when she entered the US, and at most she was 13 when she was granted asylum. If (as seems to be the case) there was immigration fraud in her entry and asylum, it was committed by her father.
-
Omar was born in October, 1982, and entered the US in 1992. Her family was granted asylum in 1995. IOW, at most she was 10 years old when she entered the US, and at most she was 13 when she was granted asylum. If (as seems to be the case) there was immigration fraud in her entry and asylum, it was committed by her father.
But as an Adult she committed immigration fraud as well marrying her brother on paper to get him into the country.
-
Omar was born in October, 1982, and entered the US in 1992. Her family was granted asylum in 1995. IOW, at most she was 10 years old when she entered the US, and at most she was 13 when she was granted asylum. If (as seems to be the case) there was immigration fraud in her entry and asylum, it was committed by her father.
...which would make her a "Dreamer," not a legal immigrant. :shrug:
-
But as an Adult she committed immigration fraud as well marrying her brother on paper to get him into the country.
True, but that is not the subject introduced by the thread title, which was the only thing to which my post responded.
-
...which would make her a "Dreamer," not a legal immigrant. :shrug:
Well, I suppose, hypothetically, she could claim that status were her naturalization reversed. But as pointed out, she seems to have committed other frauds, which could get her deported. I think she needs a good long "visit" to her native country to learn its reality. Though that "lesson" might abbreviate her "visit" there.
-
Well, I suppose, hypothetically, she could claim that status were her naturalization reversed. But as pointed out, she seems to have committed other frauds, which could get her deported. I think she needs a good long "visit" to her native country to learn its reality. Though that "lesson" might abbreviate her "visit" there.
She would not learn anything from it. For one thing, she would be treated as a Returning Conquering Queen by official Somalia, and insulated from the ugly places. And anything she would happen to see as "bad" would be dismissed with the usual complaint, "They just have the wrong people calling the shots."
-
...which would make her a "Dreamer," not a legal immigrant. :shrug:
Actually, no. A grant of legal asylum is different from Dreamers, who don't have legal status. She apparently became a legal citizen when she was 17, and any immigration fraud she committed after that point to help someone else wouldn't our her citizenship in jeopardy. But she could be prosecuted.
-
Actually, no. A grant of legal asylum is different from Dreamers, who don't have legal status. She apparently became a legal citizen when she was 17, and any immigration fraud she committed after that point to help someone else wouldn't our her citizenship in jeopardy. But she could be prosecuted.
I'd settle for that. Of course, she'd still be electable in her little MN shithole. I don't think being a Felon disqualifies for House of Representatives.
-
I'd settle for that. Of course, she'd still be electable in her little MN shithole. I don't think being a Felon disqualifies for House of Representatives.
It's more like a job qualification for the rats.
-
She would not learn anything from it. For one thing, she would be treated as a Returning Conquering Queen by official Somalia, and insulated from the ugly places. And anything she would happen to see as "bad" would be dismissed with the usual complaint, "They just have the wrong people calling the shots."
I would expect something shorter and more brutal would happen to her in that hell-hole, but maybe.
-
I'd settle for that. Of course, she'd still be electable in her little MN shithole. I don't think being a Felon disqualifies for House of Representatives.
Putting the incorrect name on the ballot qualifies her for election fraud.
If the GOP shows a little spine, they can be rid of this nuisance and she'd look like the bad guy.
But that's the real problem, isn't it?
-
Putting the incorrect name on the ballot qualifies her for election fraud.
If the GOP shows a little spine, they can be rid of this nuisance and she'd look like the bad guy.
But that's the real problem, isn't it?
"Beto O'Rourke" was the name on the ballot in TX for US Senator.
-
"Beto O'Rourke" was the name on the ballot in TX for US Senator.
According to applications to run for office in Texas, candidates may use non-hyphenated nicknames on the ballot, as long as the candidate has been known by the name for at least three years preceding the election. Candidates' nicknames sometimes appear in quotation marks, parentheses or standing alone.
https://www.amarillopioneer.com/blog/2018/8/17/robert-vs-rafael-nicknames-on-the-ballot-in-texas-races (https://www.amarillopioneer.com/blog/2018/8/17/robert-vs-rafael-nicknames-on-the-ballot-in-texas-races)
Cruz run under his nickname "Ted" as well.
https://www.statesman.com/news/20180817/politifact-why-rafael-cruz-goes-by-ted-and-robert-orourke-by-beto (https://www.statesman.com/news/20180817/politifact-why-rafael-cruz-goes-by-ted-and-robert-orourke-by-beto)
-
So?
Nothing will come of it.
Trump tweets coming.
-
According to applications to run for office in Texas, candidates may use non-hyphenated nicknames on the ballot, as long as the candidate has been known by the name for at least three years preceding the election. Candidates' nicknames sometimes appear in quotation marks, parentheses or standing alone.
https://www.amarillopioneer.com/blog/2018/8/17/robert-vs-rafael-nicknames-on-the-ballot-in-texas-races (https://www.amarillopioneer.com/blog/2018/8/17/robert-vs-rafael-nicknames-on-the-ballot-in-texas-races)
Cruz run under his nickname "Ted" as well.
https://www.statesman.com/news/20180817/politifact-why-rafael-cruz-goes-by-ted-and-robert-orourke-by-beto (https://www.statesman.com/news/20180817/politifact-why-rafael-cruz-goes-by-ted-and-robert-orourke-by-beto)
Which makes my point: Candidates for office don't have to use their "real" names. Good examples, BTW....
-
Trump tweets coming.
Wow Trump tweets stuff from the vilest sources and people but even he won't rely on WhirledNutDaily.com