The Briefing Room
General Category => National/Breaking News => SCOTUS News => Topic started by: corbe on April 23, 2024, 02:08:25 am
-
Justices seem to take city’s side in homeless encampment regulation
By Annabella Rosciglione
April 22, 2024 3:25 pm
The Supreme Court heard oral arguments Monday in a case that could answer the question about if and how homelessness can be policed.
The City of Grants, Oregon v. Johnson is set to examine overlapping laws in Grants Pass, Oregon, which outlawed sleeping and camping in public places. A pair of homeless people sued the city, claiming the law violated the Eighth Amendment protections from “cruel and unusual” punishment. Typically, the Eighth Amendment is invoked to protect against punishments, not laws.
The court appeared split along ideological lines during oral arguments. Some justices expressed concerns about punishing homeless people who don’t have an alternative shelter solution, but there seemed to be general agreement that the issue shouldn’t be decided by the courts.
The case
<..snip..>
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/2974640/justices-seem-take-city-side-homeless-encampment-regulation/ (https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/2974640/justices-seem-take-city-side-homeless-encampment-regulation/)