The Briefing Room
General Category => Elections 2020 => Topic started by: Right_in_Virginia on November 19, 2020, 06:57:55 pm
-
In dramatic reversal, Wayne County election board Republicans rescind votes certifying results
In affidavits, GOP canvass board members claim they were bullied and say there are too many irregularities in Detroit vote to justify accepting election results.
https://justthenews.com/politics-policy/elections/wayne-county-election-board-republicans-say-they-were-bullied-rescind?utm_source=breaking-newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=newsletter
-
Well done. Bkmk.
-
Mark R. Levin
@marklevinshow
1. While legal commentators on cable TV and elsewhere are regurgitating the line that none of the suits brought by the Trump campaign would change enough votes to alter the outcome of the election in Pennsylvania, the Obama federal judge made exactly the opposite point
2. — that one aspect of the campaign‘s equal protection argument would cause the rejection of hundreds of thousands of votes.
Trump campaign cites Bush v. Gore in Pennsylvania election case
President Trump’s campaign repeatedly cited the US Supreme Court’s landmark ruling in the 2000 election in a bid Wednesday to keep challenging Joe Biden’s projected victory in Pennsylvania.
7:42 AM · Nov 19, 2020·Twitter for Android
https://twitter.com/marklevinshow/status/1329404658968907777
-
Trump Campaign Sues Pennsylvania In Hopes State Will Just Declare Him Winner
President Donald Trump’s election campaign filed a revised lawsuit Wednesday asking the Pennsylvania government to simply declare him the winner, days after a previous failed legal battle in the same state.
The new lawsuit alleges GOP poll watchers weren’t allowed meaningful access to observe the vote tallying process. It also requests that the Republican-held state legislature be granted authorization to appoint a suite of electors who would name Trump the victor in the state, according to Politico. Former Vice President Joe Biden was declared the victor in the state with a lead of more than 80,000 votes in the days after Nov. 3, though that result won’t be officially certified until Nov. 23.
more
https://dailycaller.com/2020/11/19/trump-campaign-pennsylvania-lawsuit-election-result-biden/
-
:bkmk:
-
:bkmk:
-
:bkmk:
-
Well, I see we’ve got our ducks in a row.
Let’s hope Trump’s legal team has all their ducks in single file.
-
Jim Hoft
@gatewaypundit
·
26m
BREAKING UPDATE--> Dominion Voting Systems BACKS OUT from Testifying Before Pennsylvania State House Committee -- What Are They Hiding? ...Update: Presser at 10 AM
https://twitter.com/gatewaypundit/status/1329796641684131849 (https://twitter.com/gatewaypundit/status/1329796641684131849)
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/11/breaking-dominion-voting-systems-backs-testifying-pennsylvania-state-house-committee-hiding/ (https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/11/breaking-dominion-voting-systems-backs-testifying-pennsylvania-state-house-committee-hiding/)
-
In sworn statement, prominent mathematician flags up to 100,000 Pennsylvania ballots
Federal Elections Commission Chairman Trey Trainor says new analysis by professor Steven Miller "adds to the conclusions that some level of voter fraud took place in this year's election."
By Daniel Payne and John Solomon
https://justthenews.com/politics-policy/elections/mathematics-prof-says-sworn-statement-many-56000-gop-ballots-pa-may-be
-
PA House Republicans
@PAHouseGOP
Grove: Dominion Voting Systems could have put all of Pennsylvania's voters questions about their role in our elections at ease had they shown up here today. They chose to cancel and we're still left with these questions.
10:11 AM · Nov 20, 2020·TweetDeck
https://twitter.com/PAHouseGOP/status/1329804671964286978
-
PA House Republicans
@PAHouseGOP
Grove: Dominion Voting Systems could have put all of Pennsylvania's voters questions about their role in our elections at ease had they shown up here today. They chose to cancel and we're still left with these questions.
10:11 AM · Nov 20, 2020·TweetDeck
https://twitter.com/PAHouseGOP/status/1329804671964286978
They DO NOT want to be put under oath and likely will not be.
-
PA House Republicans
@PAHouseGOP
Rep. Dawn Keefer: 14 counties used the Dominion Voting Systems software. We trust the workers in our polling places and in our counties. But what we don't know is the role of 3rd party companies. And when they rescind their participation in our hearing, we're left wondering why
10:08 AM · Nov 20, 2020·TweetDeck
https://twitter.com/PAHouseGOP/status/1329803837641732102
PA House Republicans
@PAHouseGOP
Rep. Dawn Keefer: Transparency is key for our election security. Dominion Voting Software is asking us to give them only blind trust. We're very disappointed in Dominion's last minute cancelation in today's hearing.
10:10 AM · Nov 20, 2020·TweetDeck
https://twitter.com/PAHouseGOP/status/1329804353847365632
-
They DO NOT want to be put under oath and likely will not be.
Hell, even Jack Dorsey testified under oath.
-
Hell, even Jack Dorsey testified under oath.
Rasputin simply lied through his teeth under oath, knowing nothing can happen to him because Democrats.
-
#ThePersistence
@ScottPresler
I Have Really Good News:
Pennsylvania House approved a resolution for an audit of the 2020 election.
Resolution does not require approval from democrat Governor Wolf or the state Senate.
Your calls & rallies are working.
Divided Pennsylvania House gives approval for audit of 2020 election
https://www.post-gazette.com/news/politics-state/2020/11/19/Divided-Pennsylvania-House-gives-approval-for-audit-of-2020-election/stories/202011190148 (https://www.post-gazette.com/news/politics-state/2020/11/19/Divided-Pennsylvania-House-gives-approval-for-audit-of-2020-election/stories/202011190148)
11:49 AM · Nov 20, 2020·Twitter for iPhone
https://twitter.com/ScottPresler/status/1329829266276683778 (https://twitter.com/ScottPresler/status/1329829266276683778)
-
#ThePersistence
@ScottPresler
I Have Really Good News:
Pennsylvania House approved a resolution for an audit of the 2020 election.
Resolution does not require approval from democrat Governor Wolf or the state Senate.
Your calls & rallies are working.
11:49 AM · Nov 20, 2020·Twitter for iPhone
https://twitter.com/ScottPresler/status/1329829266276683778 (https://twitter.com/ScottPresler/status/1329829266276683778)
Did that lay out specific rules for the "audit" or will it be another scam as in Georgia?
-
https://www.post-gazette.com/news/politics-state/2020/11/19/Divided-Pennsylvania-House-gives-approval-for-audit-of-2020-election/stories/202011190148
-
Divided Pennsylvania House gives approval for audit of 2020 election
Pittsburg Post Gazette, Nov 20, 2020
<snip>
Democrats attacked the proposal, calling it unconstitutional, damaging to democracy and unnecessary.
Mr. Wolf issued a written statement by email during the debate, saying any audit done by this approach would be “incomplete, duplicative and unreliable.â€
The committee is expected to generate a report that is to include, for each county and for the state as a whole:
• For both absentee and mail-in ballots, the number of applications received, the number that were approved by the county board of elections, and the number returned by voters that were subsequently canvassed.
• The number of qualified voters who used provisional ballots.
• The number of applications for absentee ballots from people who were not registered to vote, but subsequently did submit a voter registration application in time for the election — and the same information concerning mail-in ballots.
• For each county, the date and time that the county board of elections began pre-canvassing absentee ballots and mail-in ballots.
Reviews of incidents with voting machines; of “any inconsistent treatment†of mail-in ballots received after 8 p.m. on Election Day; of any inconsistencies in the way counties processed “deficient†ballots; and of access given to poll watchers and “authorized representatives.â€
More: https://www.post-gazette.com/news/politics-state/2020/11/19/Divided-Pennsylvania-House-gives-approval-for-audit-of-2020-election/stories/202011190148 (https://www.post-gazette.com/news/politics-state/2020/11/19/Divided-Pennsylvania-House-gives-approval-for-audit-of-2020-election/stories/202011190148)
-
Joe Gale
@VoteJoeGalePA
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EnRPvNsW8AASX7A?format=jpg&name=900x900)
8:15 AM · Nov 20, 2020·Twitter for iPhone
https://twitter.com/VoteJoeGalePA/status/1329775467327582210
-
Jack Posobiec @JackPosobiec
BREAKING: Kirkland & Ellis withdraws from representing Pennsylvania Secretary of State in Trump campaign case
6:30 PM · Nov 20, 2020
Cerno @Cernovich
A Kirkland & Ellis associate engaged in behavior that could lead to disbarment for not only the associate, but several partners. K&E tried to play the, "It wasn't our fault game," but that's now how the law works.
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EnTdLPeVkAAqwQb?format=jpg&name=large)
6:33 PM · Nov 20, 2020
Ian Miles Cheong @stillgray
If Kirkland & Ellis is refusing to represent PA against Trump, you can tell things aren't going quite as well as the Democrats would have you believe.
7:20 PM · Nov 20, 2020·
-
With federal judges dismissing lawsuits, not only in PA but in other states --- things are looking pretty dismal.
Federal judge dismisses Trump campaign Pennsylvania lawsuit
https://www.cnn.com/2020/11/21/politics/federal-judge-dismisses-trump-pennsylvania-lawsuit/index.html (https://www.cnn.com/2020/11/21/politics/federal-judge-dismisses-trump-pennsylvania-lawsuit/index.html)
-
With federal judges dismissing lawsuits, not only in PA but in other states --- things are looking pretty dismal.
Federal judge dismisses Trump campaign Pennsylvania lawsuit
https://www.cnn.com/2020/11/21/politics/federal-judge-dismisses-trump-pennsylvania-lawsuit/index.html (https://www.cnn.com/2020/11/21/politics/federal-judge-dismisses-trump-pennsylvania-lawsuit/index.html)
Might as well just give up now. It'll never be appealed. Alito will shoot it down, sure as God made little green apples. He's always hated the Constitution.
-
With federal judges dismissing lawsuits, not only in PA but in other states --- things are looking pretty dismal.
Federal judge dismisses Trump campaign Pennsylvania lawsuit
https://www.cnn.com/2020/11/21/politics/federal-judge-dismisses-trump-pennsylvania-lawsuit/index.html (https://www.cnn.com/2020/11/21/politics/federal-judge-dismisses-trump-pennsylvania-lawsuit/index.html)
The link reports a Federal Judge dismissing a lawsuit because allegations of fraud were not credible. My understanding, which stands to be corrected, is that the "Trump Campaign lawsuit" in PA does not allege fraud, it alleges unequal (hence unconstitutional) treatment of votes. I believe Rudy Giuliani has already pointed out that multiple lawsuits brought by plaintiffs not connected to the Trump campaign have been dismissed and, inaccurately, reported by the media as legal defeats for Trump. It is not clear to me that this reported dismissal is the end of the line in PA.
-
With federal judges dismissing lawsuits, not only in PA but in other states --- things are looking pretty dismal.
Federal judge dismisses Trump campaign Pennsylvania lawsuit
https://www.cnn.com/2020/11/21/politics/federal-judge-dismisses-trump-pennsylvania-lawsuit/index.html (https://www.cnn.com/2020/11/21/politics/federal-judge-dismisses-trump-pennsylvania-lawsuit/index.html)
This story identifies the Judge as a "long-time Republican," but Wiki says he was an O'Bastard appointment. How does this make any sense??
-
The link reports a Federal Judge dismissing a lawsuit because allegations of fraud were not credible. My understanding, which stands to be corrected, is that the "Trump Campaign lawsuit" in PA does not allege fraud, it alleges unequal (hence unconstitutional) treatment of votes. I believe Rudy Giuliani has already pointed out that multiple lawsuits brought by plaintiffs not connected to the Trump campaign have been dismissed and, inaccurately, reported by the media as legal defeats for Trump. It is not clear to me that this reported dismissal is the end of the line in PA.
As is normal for Obama Judges, this one will twist any argument into the one he can find against Trump. No claim of fraud was made, and yet he threw it out because there's no fraud. That's John Roberts level spinning. We'll be seeing this all the way to the SCOTUS. And to the doomsayers, there is time to do it.
-
This story identifies the Judge as a "long-time Republican," but Wiki says he was an O'Bastard appointment. How does this make any sense??
Liberals running under the Republican umbrella...or shifting parties??
-
Liberals running under the Republican umbrella...or shifting parties??
Or was a far-leftie who acted as a Republican because being a Rat in his hometown couldn't be elected dog catcher. Either way, I think O'Bastard would never appoint a Judge who didn't to the leftist line.
-
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EnZEdLtXYAQqo2h?format=jpg&name=large)
-
⚡ Mαχιмυs Uncensored
@Maximus_4EVR
PA Case Update
Ok, some good news in the ruling:
-Judge Brann, either out of mass stupidity or deliberate genius, cited the Bognet v. Boockvar PA SC decision for his grounds of dismissal.
-SCOTUS deadlocked 4-4 to overturn Bognet in Oct.
THAT tees up SCOTUS.
10:21 PM · Nov 21, 2020·Twitter for Android
https://twitter.com/Maximus_4EVR/status/1330350594100326400
-
'Without merit': Judge dismisses Trump campaign lawsuit in Pennsylvania
by Jerry Dunleavy, Justice Department Reporter & Zachary Halaschak, Breaking News Reporter |
| November 21, 2020 07:25 PM
| Updated Nov 21, 2020, 08:33 PM
The Trump campaign’s lawsuit seeking to block the certification of Pennsylvania’s election was dismissed with prejudice by a federal court judge on Saturday.
U.S. Middle District of Pennsylvania Judge Matthew Brann made the decision after days of motions filed on both sides and after hearing oral arguments on Tuesday from President Trump’s personal attorney, Rudy Giuliani, who took over the case last week.
In a scathing critique of the legal basis for the case, Brann wrote that Trump’s lawyers “ask this Court to disenfranchise almost seven million voters†but “this Court has been unable to find any case in which a plaintiff has sought such a drastic remedy in the contest of an election, in terms of the sheer volume of votes asked to be invalidated.â€
“One might expect that when seeking such a startling outcome, a plaintiff would come formidably armed with compelling legal arguments and factual proof of rampant corruption, such that this Court would have no option but to regrettably grant the proposed injunctive relief despite the impact it would have on such a large group of citizens,†Brann ruled. “That has not happened.â€
The judge, an Obama appointee unanimously confirmed by the Senate in 2012, said that the plaintiffs offered “strained legal arguments without merit and speculative accusations.â€
more
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/without-merit-judge-dismisses-trump-campaign-lawsuit-in-pennsylvania (https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/without-merit-judge-dismisses-trump-campaign-lawsuit-in-pennsylvania)
-
Trump Lawyers: Pennsylvania Lawsuit Dismissal Moves Us Closer to Supreme Court
President Donald Trump’s campaign lawyers said Saturday they would file an appeal to the Third Circuit court after a federal judge dismissed a lawsuit to challenge the results of the election in Pennsylvania.
Trump 2020 attorneys former Mayor Rudy Giuliani and Jenna Ellis said in a statement:
Today’s decision turns out to help us in our strategy to get expeditiously to the U.S. Supreme Court. Although we fully disagree with this opinion, we’re thankful to the Obama-appointed judge for making this anticipated decision quickly, rather than simply trying to run out the clock.
more
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2020/11/21/trump-lawyers-pennsylvania-lawsuit-dismissal-moves-us-closer-to-supreme-court/ (https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2020/11/21/trump-lawyers-pennsylvania-lawsuit-dismissal-moves-us-closer-to-supreme-court/)
-
This story identifies the Judge as a "long-time Republican," but Wiki says he was an O'Bastard appointment. How does this make any sense??
Susan Collins is a life-long Republican, too. :shrug:
In any case, I think the overarching expectation is that this will end up in the SCOTUS, so every lower court decision - whether for or against - is just another step down that path.
-
'Without merit': Judge dismisses Trump campaign lawsuit in Pennsylvania
by Jerry Dunleavy, Justice Department Reporter & Zachary Halaschak, Breaking News Reporter |
| November 21, 2020 07:25 PM
| Updated Nov 21, 2020, 08:33 PM
The Trump campaign’s lawsuit seeking to block the certification of Pennsylvania’s election was dismissed with prejudice by a federal court judge on Saturday.
U.S. Middle District of Pennsylvania Judge Matthew Brann made the decision after days of motions filed on both sides and after hearing oral arguments on Tuesday from President Trump’s personal attorney, Rudy Giuliani, who took over the case last week.
In a scathing critique of the legal basis for the case, Brann wrote that Trump’s lawyers “ask this Court to disenfranchise almost seven million voters†but “this Court has been unable to find any case in which a plaintiff has sought such a drastic remedy in the contest of an election, in terms of the sheer volume of votes asked to be invalidated.â€
“One might expect that when seeking such a startling outcome, a plaintiff would come formidably armed with compelling legal arguments and factual proof of rampant corruption, such that this Court would have no option but to regrettably grant the proposed injunctive relief despite the impact it would have on such a large group of citizens,†Brann ruled. “That has not happened.â€
The judge, an Obama appointee unanimously confirmed by the Senate in 2012, said that the plaintiffs offered “strained legal arguments without merit and speculative accusations.â€
more
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/without-merit-judge-dismisses-trump-campaign-lawsuit-in-pennsylvania (https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/without-merit-judge-dismisses-trump-campaign-lawsuit-in-pennsylvania)
The judge assumes (without evidence) that those seven million voters even exist, or that they, themselves, should they exist, cast those ballots. In an assertion of fraud, the matter contested includes the existence of the very voters the judge claims are being disenfranchised.
-
The judge assumes (without evidence) that those seven million voters even exist, or that they, themselves, should they exist, cast those ballots. In an assertion of fraud, the matter contested includes the existence of the very voters the judge claims are being disenfranchised.
And, as usual, no mention of the 7 million legal voters disenfranchised were the judge to assume wrongly.
-
Jenna Ellis
@JennaEllisEsq
NEW: @TeamTrump has filed the notice of appeal in our federal case out of Pennsylvania.
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EndYf9GWMAA9u-6?format=jpg&name=900x900)
4:49 PM · Nov 22, 2020·Twitter for iPhone
https://twitter.com/JennaEllisEsq/status/1330629524040658948
-
Jenna Ellis
@JennaEllisEsq
NEW: @TeamTrump has filed the notice of appeal in our federal case out of Pennsylvania.
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EndYf9GWMAA9u-6?format=jpg&name=900x900)
4:49 PM · Nov 22, 2020·Twitter for iPhone
https://twitter.com/JennaEllisEsq/status/1330629524040658948
One more step to Scotus
-
Appeals Court Grants Expedited Review of Trump Campaign’s Pennsylvania Lawsuit (https://www.theepochtimes.com/appeals-court-grants-expedited-review-of-trump-campaigns-pennsylvania-lawsuit_3590208.html)
-
Appeals Court Grants Expedited Review of Trump Campaign’s Pennsylvania Lawsuit
https://trulytimes.com/appeals-court-grants-expedited-review-of-trump-campaigns-pennsylvania-lawsuit.html
-
According to the order, Trump’s “motion for emergency expedited review is granted at the direction of the court.â€
Their brief now needs to be filed by 4 p.m. on Monday, Nov. 23, and more have to be filed by 4 p.m. on Tuesday. “The court will advise if oral argument desired,†it said.
Pennsylvania’s 67 counties are scheduled to certify their election results by the end of Monday before sending them to state election officials.
Last week, a math professor who specializes in analytic number theory wrote in a sworn affidavit that he flagged up to 100,000 ballots in Pennsylvania of potential fraud.
“I estimate that the number of ballots that were either requested by someone other than the registered Republican or requested and returned but not counted range from 89,397 to 98,801,†Miller said in the sworn statement (pdf), according to Just The News.
https://www.theepochtimes.com/appeals-court-grants-expedited-review-of-trump-campaigns-pennsylvania-lawsuit_3590208.html (https://www.theepochtimes.com/appeals-court-grants-expedited-review-of-trump-campaigns-pennsylvania-lawsuit_3590208.html)
Declaration of Mathematics Professor, Steven J Miller, PhD: https://justthenews.com/sites/default/files/2020-11/Miller_DeclarationAndAnalyisPA_GOP_BallotRequestData_2020_Final.pdf (https://justthenews.com/sites/default/files/2020-11/Miller_DeclarationAndAnalyisPA_GOP_BallotRequestData_2020_Final.pdf)
-
(https://media.thedonald.win/post/HxGZekLP.jpeg)
-
Pennsylvania Legislative Committee Shuts Down Election Audit Request
Joshua Caplan 23 Nov 2020
Pennsylvania state lawmakers on Monday turned down a formal call for the 2020 election to undergo an audit as President Donald Trump continues to challenge the key battleground state’s election results.
A bipartisan, bicameral legislative service agency on Monday, in a rare move, rejected a request from the House of Representatives to conduct a statistical-level review of the conduct of 2020 general election. The Legislative Budget & Finance Committee officers voted 2-1 against performing the “risk-limiting†audit that was ordered by House Resolution 1100. That resolution, sponsored by Rep. Jesse Topper, R-Bedford County, passed the House on Thursday by a 112-90 vote, with all Republican members and three Democrats supporting it. […] Sen. Jim Brewster and Rep. Jake Wheatley, both Allegheny County Democrats, voted against taking on the audit. Sen. Bob Mensch, R-Montgomery County, favored the committee accept the assignment. Rep. Steve Barrar, R-Delaware County, who is retiring from the House at the end of this month, didn’t participate in the Zoom meeting.
more
https://www.breitbart.com/2020-election/2020/11/23/pennsylvania-legislative-committee-shuts-down-election-audit-request/ (https://www.breitbart.com/2020-election/2020/11/23/pennsylvania-legislative-committee-shuts-down-election-audit-request/)
-
Pennsylvania Legislative Committee Shuts Down Election Audit Request
Joshua Caplan 23 Nov 2020
Pennsylvania state lawmakers on Monday turned down a formal call for the 2020 election to undergo an audit as President Donald Trump continues to challenge the key battleground state’s election results.
more
https://www.breitbart.com/2020-election/2020/11/23/pennsylvania-legislative-committee-shuts-down-election-audit-request/ (https://www.breitbart.com/2020-election/2020/11/23/pennsylvania-legislative-committee-shuts-down-election-audit-request/)
THIS is a state legislature we're depending on to repair the broken election? I am, for real, laughing my azz off.
-
Pennsylvania certifies election results for Biden
The certification comes after President Trump pursued various legal challenges in the state.
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2020-election/pennsylvania-certifies-election-results-biden-n1248804?cid=sm_npd_nn_tw_ma (https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2020-election/pennsylvania-certifies-election-results-biden-n1248804?cid=sm_npd_nn_tw_ma)
-
Jenna Ellis
@JennaEllisEsq
(https://abs-0.twimg.com/emoji/v2/svg/1f6a8.svg)(https://abs-0.twimg.com/emoji/v2/svg/1f6a8.svg)(https://abs-0.twimg.com/emoji/v2/svg/1f6a8.svg) NEW: PENNSYLVANIA, ARIZONA, MICHIGAN LEGISLATURES TO HOLD PUBLIC HEARINGS ON 2020 ELECTION
Trump Legal Team Statement
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EnnwBRzXIAEwFpM?format=jpg&name=360x360)
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EnnwBRyW8AQji_K?format=jpg&name=small)
5:08 PM · Nov 24, 2020·Twitter for iPhone
https://twitter.com/JennaEllisEsq/status/1331359074114482176
-
Pennsylvania State Senate Plans Meeting to Air Complaints of Voter Fraud
The Pennsylvania State Senate Majority Policy Committee plans to meet Wednesday in Gettysburg to air complaints of voter fraud to the public.
“Over the past few weeks, I have heard from thousands of Pennsylvanians regarding issues experienced at the polls, irregularities with the mail-in voting system, and concerns whether their vote was counted,†State Sen. David Argall, R-Mahanoy City said in a statement. “We need to correct these issues to restore faith in our republic.â€
The meeting will take place on Wednesday, November 25 at 12:30 p.m. at the Wyndham Hotel in Gettysburg.
more
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2020/11/25/pennsylvania-state-senate-plans-meeting-to-air-complaints-of-voter-fraud/ (https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2020/11/25/pennsylvania-state-senate-plans-meeting-to-air-complaints-of-voter-fraud/)
-
Pennsylvania State Senate Plans Meeting to Air Complaints of Voter Fraud
The Pennsylvania State Senate Majority Policy Committee plans to meet Wednesday in Gettysburg to air complaints of voter fraud to the public.
“Over the past few weeks, I have heard from thousands of Pennsylvanians regarding issues experienced at the polls, irregularities with the mail-in voting system, and concerns whether their vote was counted,†State Sen. David Argall, R-Mahanoy City said in a statement. “We need to correct these issues to restore faith in our republic.â€
The meeting will take place on Wednesday, November 25 at 12:30 p.m. at the Wyndham Hotel in Gettysburg.
more
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2020/11/25/pennsylvania-state-senate-plans-meeting-to-air-complaints-of-voter-fraud/ (https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2020/11/25/pennsylvania-state-senate-plans-meeting-to-air-complaints-of-voter-fraud/)
I hope that isn't like so many meetings I have been to where when it was over, they said we heard the testimony or comments of X number of people, and then ignored them all to do what we wanted to do in the first place. 9999hair out0000
-
I hope that isn't like so many meetings I have been to where when it was over, they said we heard the testimony or comments of X number of people, and then ignored them all to do what we wanted to do in the first place. 9999hair out0000
I expect this to be the result of this Kabuki Theatre.
-
I expect this to be the result of this Kabuki Theatre.
I think the real question here, is one of how many elected officials owe their jobs to fraud, no matter which side of the aisle they are on. I don't think an honest assessment of that situation would make us happy at all.
And by fraud I don't just mean the lying media acting as propaganda organs to affect how people voted, but actual tampering with, switching, destroying, 'weighing' votes, and stuffing ballot boxes through all the various means ("harvesting", multiple votes, created votes, duplicate ballots, dead voter ballots, stolen ballots, etc.). I believe all of these methods were used, and even multiple methods in the same districts to make it harder to expose the fraud.
Remember, the refuge and first line of defense of these scoundrels has been to perform illegal acts so outrageous that attempts to expose them are dismissed as "conspiracy theory" because to the average LIV or honest person, they sound incredulous.
-
Trump cancels plans to attend Pennsylvania GOP event on election
President Trump canceled plans on Wednesday to attend an event orchestrated by Pennsylvania Republicans to highlight allegations of election irregularities.
Trump was expected to join Rudy Giuliani and other legal representatives affiliated with his campaign at the event at a hotel in Gettysburg, but it was scrapped at the last moment. The trip was never officially on Trump's schedule, but multiple news outlets reported he planned to make an appearance.
The cancellation came shortly after a campaign adviser, Boris Epshteyn, shared that he had tested positive for coronavirus. Epshteyn was at a news conference last week alongside Giuliani and Jenna Ellis, who were both planning to make the trip to Gettysburg.
ADVERTISEMENT
The Republican Party of Pennsylvania had announced the event would take place at a Gettysburg hotel rather than the state capitol building. Some in the party have pushed allegations of fraud in the vote in the state, but there is no evidence of widespread irregularities.
Pennsylvania Gov. Tom Wolf (D) on Monday formally signed off on the state's certification declaring Joe Biden as the winner.
https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/527531-trump-cancels-plans-to-attend-pennsylvania-gop-event-on-election
-
Charlie Kirk
@charliekirk11
BREAKING:
A Pennsylvania judge is blocking the state from certifying election results pending a Trump Campaign challenge to the constitutionality of mail-in ballots
This is huge. The fight isn't over. Don't give up on
@realDonaldTrump
https://twitter.com/charliekirk11/status/1331650844983316480
-
Another link to this bit of much-needed good news....
Judge Blocks Certification of Pennsylvania Election Results
https://www.theepochtimes.com/judge-blocks-certification-of-pennsylvania-election-results_3593327.html?utm_source=newsnoe&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=breaking-2020-11-25-1 (https://www.theepochtimes.com/judge-blocks-certification-of-pennsylvania-election-results_3593327.html?utm_source=newsnoe&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=breaking-2020-11-25-1)
-
Breaking — Judge Blocks Certification of Pennsylvania Election Results…
Posted by Kane on November 25, 2020 1:11 pm
Just hit the wires in the past few minutes…
more
https://www.citizenfreepress.com/breaking/breaking-judge-blocks-certification-of-pennsylvania-election-results/ (https://www.citizenfreepress.com/breaking/breaking-judge-blocks-certification-of-pennsylvania-election-results/)
-
http://www.youtube.com/embed/ZYtwfyi78Bs (http://www.youtube.com/embed/ZYtwfyi78Bs)
-
Some in the party have pushed allegations of fraud in the vote in the state, but there is no evidence of widespread irregularities.
Pennsylvania Gov. Tom Wolf (D) on Monday formally signed off on the state's certification declaring Joe Biden as the winner.
https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/527531-trump-cancels-plans-to-attend-pennsylvania-gop-event-on-election
The continuous mantra of the fraudsters' enablers has been confronted with evidence like a fly confronting a flyswatter.
-
Jim Hoft
@gatewaypundit
·
3m
HUGE! PA Lawmaker: Democrat Governor Wolf MANDATED Dominion Voting Systems -- It was NOT Voted on by Lawmakers
https://twitter.com/gatewaypundit/status/1331708621428838404
-
"COUNT ONLY LEGAL VOTES" Rudy Giuliani OPENING STATEMENT On Election Fraud Claims | NewsNOW From FOX
Nov 25, 2020
Error 404 (Not Found)!!1 (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wzN38qIcr0o#)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wzN38qIcr0o (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wzN38qIcr0o)
-
"TRUMP WILL WIN" President Trump Legal Team Hearing On Pennsylvania Ballots | NewsNOW From FOX
Nov 25, 2020
(Not a full replay)
Error 404 (Not Found)!!1 (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dc-HQyBm8GU#)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dc-HQyBm8GU (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dc-HQyBm8GU)
-
Team Trump
@TeamTrump
WATCH: Crowd gasps after finding out that a mysterious spike of votes in Pennsylvania had 600,000 votes for Biden and only 3,200 for @realDonaldTrump
Video: https://twitter.com/TeamTrump/status/1331680682578501632
2:26 PM · Nov 25, 2020·Twitter Media Studio
-
Team Trump
@TeamTrump
President @realDonaldTrump's full remarks at the Pennsylvania State Senate hearing on massive voter fraud in the 2020 Election
Video: https://twitter.com/TeamTrump/status/1331691376459849733
3:09 PM · Nov 25, 2020·Twitter Media Studio
-
Rasmussen Reports
@Rasmussen_Poll
An impressively credible lineup of citizen witnesses & dozens more ready to testify.
Legacy media looking incredibly foolish & partisan tonight.
But then, what is new about that?
https://twitter.com/Rasmussen_Poll/status/1331709446326808576
Nailed it!
-
Trump Says Giuliani’s Election Efforts Will Be His ‘Crowning Achievement’ During Surprise Phone Call Into Pennsylvania Senate Hearing
https://dailycaller.com/2020/11/25/trump-giulianis-election-efforts-crowning-achievement-phone-call-pennsylvania-senate-hearing/
-
Kyle Becker
@kylenabecker
PENNSYLVANIA.
"We just learned that... all chain of custody logs, records, yellow sheets, *everything* was gone. All forensic evidence, all custody sheets"...
If you care about U.S. election security, *STOP* what you're doing and watch this
Justin Hart
@justin_hart
Witness: "All chain of custody laws are gone in Delaware County."
Video: https://twitter.com/justin_hart/status/1331691775744884736
3:10 PM · Nov 25, 2020·Twitter Web App
https://twitter.com/justin_hart/status/1331691775744884736
-
Joan M. Cullen âââ
@JoanieBaloney90
At the #PASenatehearing, a senator just asked if Rudy has any witnesses who'd actually qualify as a whistleblower, ie someone who actually participated in the fraud and is willing to testify. He said yes. More than one, including at least one (D).
3:33 PM · Nov 25, 2020·Twitter for Android
https://twitter.com/JoanieBaloney90/status/1331697480598220801
-
Kyle Becker
@kylenabecker
PENNSYLVANIA.
"We just learned that... all chain of custody logs, records, yellow sheets, *everything* was gone. All forensic evidence, all custody sheets"...
If you care about U.S. election security, *STOP* what you're doing and watch this
3:10 PM · Nov 25, 2020·Twitter Web App
https://twitter.com/justin_hart/status/1331691775744884736
Swell, that's what I was afraid of. Now I'm never going to convince @roamer_1 fraud happened. 9999hair out0000
There will be no possible remedy if fraud is proven, and the PA legislature will have to seat the Electors. They'll stupidly put Democrats in to "heal the nation."
-
Justin Hart
@justin_hart
Here's a quick blast of videos from the last hour or so of the special off-site hearing from Republican Senators in Pennsylvania.
Data Scientist from Delaware County told that 47 USB cards are missing with 50K votes.
Video: https://twitter.com/justin_hart/status/1331691742995759104
3:10 PM · Nov 25, 2020·Twitter Web App
-
Justin Hart
@justin_hart
More from this witness
Video: https://twitter.com/justin_hart/status/1331691803347542017
3:10 PM · Nov 25, 2020·Twitter Web App
-
Justin Hart
@justin_hart
Here are some of the charts we highlighted reproduced for this panel.
Video: https://twitter.com/justin_hart/status/1331691842358759424
Can't see this enough pointing-up
-
Swell, that's what I was afraid of. Now I'm never going to convince @roamer_1 fraud happened. 9999hair out0000
There will be no possible remedy if fraud is proven, and the PA legislature will have to seat the Electors. They'll stupidly put Democrats in to "heal the nation."
You don't need to prove fraud. Broken chain of custody and non-auditable records should nullify votes, whether fraud or simple incompetence.
:shrug:
-
You don't need to prove fraud. Broken chain of custody and non-auditable records should nullify votes, whether fraud or simple incompetence.
:shrug:
It would for normal laws, but this is political laws, subject to breakage at will because the miscreants know they'll never be punished.
-
You don't need to prove fraud. Broken chain of custody and non-auditable records should nullify votes, whether fraud or simple incompetence.
:shrug:
Oh they were competent enough to destroy evidence...
-
Team Trump
@TeamTrump
GOP observer Justin Kweder: Hundreds of thousands of Philadelphia mail-in ballots were processed with ZERO civilian oversight
Video: https://twitter.com/TeamTrump/status/1331665609898266626
1:26 PM · Nov 25, 2020·Twitter Media Studio
-
Oh they were competent enough to destroy evidence...
Then it won't withstand an audit.
-
It would for normal laws, but this is political laws, subject to breakage at will because the miscreants know they'll never be punished.
Neither here nor there until an audit trail proves it.
Again, all the whining and crying and throwing dirt in the air don't mean a damn thing, until it is PROVEN in a court of law.
-
You don't need to prove fraud. Broken chain of custody and non-auditable records should nullify votes, whether fraud or simple incompetence.
:shrug:
Should being the key word here. But, in case you haven't noticed... an awful lot of things that "should" be are not now, and probably never will be.
It's an upside down world we live in.
-
Swell, that's what I was afraid of. Now I'm never going to convince @roamer_1 fraud happened. 9999hair out0000
There will be no possible remedy if fraud is proven, and the PA legislature will have to seat the Electors. They'll stupidly put Democrats in to "heal the nation."
9999hair out0000 Then there is no legal recourse, no chance of overturning this election. I believe it but can't believe that in the United Stated of America we have had an election like a freakin' Banana Republic. The integrity of the U.S. electoral system is no longer. *mad* I'm also in tears. Never, ever in my years growing up imagined that this could ever happen. The eight years of Bammy's reign of terror was a wake up call and his regime and all his cronies strikes again.
I have no more words.
-
Neither here nor there until an audit trail proves it.
Again, all the whining and crying and throwing dirt in the air don't mean a damn thing, until it is PROVEN in a court of law.
When they break the law (what do laws matter to the radical left?)... and destroy the "audit trail" (Hillary got away with it, after all).... how does one go about "proving" it in a court of law, pray tell?
-
When they break the law (what do laws matter to the radical left?)... and destroy the "audit trail" (Hillary got away with it, after all).... how does one go about "proving" it in a court of law, pray tell?
That is what an audit trail is *for*... Get an audit. Votes that are nonexistent in the audit trail are nullified, as are votes with bad signatures, and questionable markings. That is why the record must be able to be audited.
-
Jenna Ellis
@JennaEllisEsq
You’re by far not alone.
Remember — President @realDonaldTrump will always fight for America!
Jeremy Ryan Slate
@JeremyRyanSlate
@JennaEllisEsq I was feeling depressed about the situation until I watched this hearing. The level of evidence that you presented is astounding
4:49 PM · Nov 25, 2020·Twitter for iPhone
https://twitter.com/JennaEllisEsq/status/1331716697406005248
-
Jenna Ellis
@JennaEllisEsq
Twitter is actively suppressing the significance of what happened today in Gettysburg, Pennsylvania.
This election was RIGGED and America sees it clearly now.
4:46 PM · Nov 25, 2020·Twitter for iPhone
https://twitter.com/JennaEllisEsq/status/1331715999138279428
-
Jack Posobiec
@JackPosobiec
The energy has shifted
4:25 PM · Nov 25, 2020·Twitter for iPhone
https://twitter.com/JackPosobiec/status/1331710733344776197
:bingo:
-
Jenna Ellis
@JennaEllisEsq
Twitter is actively suppressing the significance of what happened today in Gettysburg, Pennsylvania.
This election was RIGGED and America sees it clearly now.
4:46 PM · Nov 25, 2020·Twitter for iPhone
https://twitter.com/JennaEllisEsq/status/1331715999138279428
The legal team has to be careful to tie what happened in PA with the rest of the questionable states. Don't let the media etc., when they finally have to acknowledge something is wrong, try to isolate PA as an anomaly.
-
This story identifies the Judge as a "long-time Republican," but Wiki says he was an O'Bastard appointment. How does this make any sense??
@Cyber Liberty
Everybody in the Bush Crime Family were also "Long-time Republicans",and look at how THAT worked out for America.
-
@Cyber Liberty
Everybody in the Bush Crime Family were also "Long-time Republicans",and look at how THAT worked out for America.
This has precisely ZERO to do with the Bush's. Focus.
-
This has precisely ZERO to do with the Bush's. Focus.
@Cyber Liberty
It has EVERYTHING to do with RINO's. You are the one that needs to focus. You are in denial.
-
Elizabeth Harrington
@LizRNC
WATCH: @SenMastriano gives stirring opening statement.
“The republic is at stake. This is no game for us.
“There’s a group in this state and country willing to throw away our valuable and precious freedoms.
“We’re here to shed light on darkness.â€
Video: https://twitter.com/LizRNC/status/1331672690873217024
1:54 PM · Nov 25, 2020·Twitter Media Studio
-
@Cyber Liberty
It has EVERYTHING to do with RINO's. You are the one that needs to focus. You are in denial.
No, I'm the one that's pissed off that you drag the "Bush family" into every GD discussion about corruption.
-
Full PA Senate hearing
Nov 25, 2020
Video: https://twitter.com/RSBNetwork/status/1331648247539003392
[Note: Toward the end of this video there's a Q&A with the senators. Jenna Ellis answered a question on remedies and also gives a brief tutorial on the role of state legislatures in selecting electors)
-
Full PA Senate hearing
Nov 25, 2020
Video: https://twitter.com/RSBNetwork/status/1331648247539003392
[Note: Toward the end of this video there's a Q&A with the senators. Jenna Ellis answered a question on remedies and also gives a brief tutorial on the role of state legislatures in selecting electors)
I'll make book for a C-Note that the lily-livered RINOS in Pennsylvania will seat Democrat Electors if it gets to the Legislature.
-
I'll make book for a C-Note that the lily-livered RINOS in Pennsylvania will seat Democrat Electors if it gets to the Legislature.
I wouldn't be rushing to place that bet just yet @Cyber Liberty Watch the last 12 minutes of the full RSBN video. wink777
-
No, I'm the one that's pissed off that you drag the "Bush family" into every GD discussion about corruption.
@Cyber Liberty
Why wouldn't I? They DEFINE corruption,just like the Clinton's and the Kennedy Klan.
-
Jack Posobiec
@JackPosobiec
Replying to @JackPosobiecState senator just confirmed this is a legislative hearing
12:53 PM · Nov 25, 2020·Twitter Web App
https://twitter.com/JackPosobiec/status/1331657254765023233
This is important. The media, if reporting at all on this, is portraying it as a GOP meeting.
-
I wouldn't be rushing to place that bet just yet @Cyber Liberty Watch the last 12 minutes of the full RSBN video. wink777
I don't do well with vids...can't hear them very well. :shrug:
ETA: I saw a clip with that military guy who said there were 600,000 votes for Biteme in one count, and 3,000 for Trump.
-
Elizabeth Harrington
@LizRNC
WATCH: @SenMastriano gives stirring opening statement.
“The republic is at stake. This is no game for us.
“There’s a group in this state and country willing to throw away our valuable and precious freedoms.
“We’re here to shed light on darkness.â€
Video: https://twitter.com/LizRNC/status/1331672690873217024
1:54 PM · Nov 25, 2020·Twitter Media Studio
Aaand right on schedule Twitter suspends the senator's account.
-
This is important. The media, if reporting at all on this, is portraying it as a GOP meeting.
It isn’t journalism if on the front page they editorialize everything from the headline to the lead sentence to the body. I spit on my journalism degree with every news break. Mainstream newsrooms may never recover from the shame they brought onto themselves and to the country. It’s disgusting and disgraceful. Every story since 2015 should have come with a warning disclaimer: Democrat Party Press Release.
-
When they break the law (what do laws matter to the radical left?)... and destroy the "audit trail" (Hillary got away with it, after all).... how does one go about "proving" it in a court of law, pray tell?
It's called spoliation in legalese and can be used in a court of law to prove culpability.
https://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/spoliation
And Hillary was not prosecuted for other reasons, not due to lack of evidence.
-
Aaand right on schedule Twitter suspends the senator's account.
Yup. Imagine the control they'll have if Slo Joe is sworn into office.
-
Scott Adams Retweeted
Cerno
@Cernovich
After today’s Pennsylvania hearing, no person of good faith can claim this was a fair and free election.
4:12 PM · Nov 25, 2020·Twitter for iPhone
https://twitter.com/Cernovich/status/1331707452304228352
-
Cerno
@Cernovich
What evidence presented today in Pennsylvania impressed you the most?
4:26 PM · Nov 25, 2020·Twitter for iPhone
Link: https://twitter.com/Cernovich/status/1331710946138460162
Click on the link for an interesting thread ..... pointing-up
-
It's called spoliation in legalese and can be used in a court of law to prove culpability.
https://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/spoliation
And Hillary was not prosecuted for other reasons, not due to lack of evidence.
@IsailedawayfromFR
No kidding.
NOT being snotty or trying to attack YOU,either. I am convinced ANY Dim President could eat a live baby during a televised press conference and never even have it mentioned in the press,never mind have to face arrest or charges.
This does NOT apply to Republican Presidents,who only seem to have to be breathing to have committed several felonies,though.
And like it or not,this is OUR fault because we let them get away with it.
Or have,up to this point,anyhow. Not sure this isn't changing. From what I have seen,there are a LOT of frustrated voters out there these days.
It just might take a while for the dust to settle on this theft.
-
Donald J. Trump
@realDonaldTrump
Wow! Twitter bans highly respected Pennsylvania State Senator Doug Mastriano after he did a great job of leading a hearing on the 2020 Election fraud. They and the Fake News, working together, want to SILENCE THE TRUTH. Can’t let that happen. This is what Communist countries do!
8:36 AM · Nov 27, 2020·Twitter for iPhone
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1332317394165968899
-
PHILADELPHIA (AP) — President Donald Trump’s legal team suffered yet another defeat in court Friday as a federal appeals court in Philadelphia roundly rejected the campaign’s latest effort to challenge the state’s election results.
Trump’s lawyers vowed to appeal to the Supreme Court despite the judges’ assessment that the “campaign’s claims have no merit.â€
“Free, fair elections are the lifeblood of our democracy. Charges of unfairness are serious. But calling an election unfair does not make it so. Charges require specific allegations and then proof. We have neither here,†3rd Circuit Judge Stephanos Bibas wrote for the three-judge panel.
https://apnews.com/article/election-2020-donald-trump-pennsylvania-elections-philadelphia-d9c96c4593ec278f3b1d4bc564068df6
Looks like we're going to the Supremes starting with Pennsylvania @Bigun
-
Looks like we're going to the Supremes starting with Pennsylvania @Bigun
:yowsa: Thanks @Right_in_Virginia
-
Looks like we're going to the Supremes starting with Pennsylvania @Bigun
It appears another PA Judge threw out another case after creating a straw man just to burn it down. Last time, a Judge declared Trump did not prove fraud, when Trump's team did not even try to make that argument. The arguments made were then left unremarked upon.
-
Appeals court rejects Trump campaign’s Pennsylvania lawsuit, setting up Supreme Court next
The president's campaign will continue pushing their legal fight toward the Supreme Court
By Sophie Mann
Updated: November 27, 2020 - 3:59pm
The Trump 2020 campaign's legal team suffered another blow in court on Friday, as a federal appeals court in Philadelphia rejected the attorneys' effort to contest the results of the presidential election in Pennsylvania.
Judge Stephanos Bibas wrote on behalf of the three-judge panel that reviewed the appeal, "Free, fair elections are the lifeblood of our democracy. Charges of unfairness are serious. But calling an election unfair does not make it so. Charges require specific allegations and then proof. We have neither here."
Trump's attorneys have vowed to appeal the case to the Supreme Court, despite the round dismissal from the appeals court.
Senior strategy adviser for the Trump campaign Steve Cortes told Just the News that "We will be appealing to the United States Supreme Court, which has always been where we wanted to end up. The sooner the better. We want to make these cases before the high court and we believe we have a compelling argument to make."
The case was argued last week by President Trump's personal lawyer Rudy Giuliani, who presented the case that the results of the election had been undermined by widespread voter fraud across Pennsylvania. But Giuliani offered little tangible evidence to fortify his claims.
All three of the judges on Friday's panel of 3rd U.S. Circuit Court judges were appointed by Republicans, including Judge Bibas who is a Trump appointee. Until 2019, President Trump's sister, Maryanne Trump Barry, sat on the court for two decades.
more
https://justthenews.com/government/courts-law/us-court-appeals-rejects-trump-campaign-appeal-over-race-pennsylvania?utm_source=breaking-newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=newsletter
-
Senator Doug Mastriano
@SenMastriano
This was posted on our Department of State dashboard but had since been deleted.
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/En2hlP5XYAAYO_m?format=jpg&name=small)
1:59 PM · Nov 27, 2020·Twitter for iPhone
https://twitter.com/SenMastriano/status/1332398733401591808
-
Seriously? It is no longer going to be enough (at least with me).... for Trump to retain the White House. I want (need) to see some heads roll, some perps frog-marched, and some damned consequences for these cretins. Enough is damned well enough. 9999hair out0000
-
Sam Girgis
@DrSamGirgis
Watch as 20K PA votes for Trump disappear in real time on @CNN... 1,690K to 1,670K. Explanations? @realDonaldTrump JoeBiden @JohnKingCNN
Video: https://twitter.com/DrSamGirgis/status/1332420490879709184
3:26 PM · Nov 27, 2020·Twitter for Android
(Jenna Ellis retweeted: https://twitter.com/JennaEllisEsq/status/1332505963375554560 )
-
Jenna Ellis Retweeted
Senator Doug Mastriano
@SenMastriano
I proposed a legislative measure today that seeks accountability associated with the 2020 general election. @PASenateGOP
Senate of Pennsylvania
Session of 2019 - 2020 Regular Session
MEMORANDUM
Posted: November 27, 2020 07:33 PM
From: Senator Doug Mastriano and Sen. David J. Arnold, Jr., Sen. Michele Brooks, Sen. Mario M. Scavello
To: All Senate members
Subject: RESOLUTION: Disputing the 2020 General Election
In the immediate future, we will be introducing the following resolution:
**********
A RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, Article I, Section 4, Clause 1 of the United States Constitution empowers state legislatures, including the General Assembly of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, to prescribe the “Times, Places, and Manner†of conducting elections; and
WHEREAS, Article II, Section 1, Clause 2 of the United States Constitution empowers state legislatures, including the General Assembly of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, to direct the manner of appointing electors for President and Vice President of the United States; and
WHEREAS, the General Assembly of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania has exercised its authority to establish election administration procedures for the Commonwealth, known as the Pennsylvania Election Code; and
WHEREAS, the Pennsylvania Election Code requires all mail-in ballots to be received by eight o’clock P.M. on the day of the election; and
WHEREAS, the Pennsylvania Election Code requires election officials at polling places to authenticate the signatures of in-person voters; and
WHEREAS, the Pennsylvania Election Code requires mail-in ballots to be received in the office of the county board of elections and makes no mention of "satellite locations" to be solely used for the collection of "mail-in" ballots; and
WHEREAS, the Pennsylvania Election Code requires that county boards of elections shall not meet to conduct a pre-canvass of all absentee and mail-in ballots until seven o’clock A.M. on Election Day, during which time defects on mail-in ballots would be identified; and
WHEREAS, the Pennsylvania Election Code prohibits the counting of defective absentee or mail-in ballots; and
WHEREAS, the Pennsylvania Election Code authorizes “watchers,†selected by candidates and political parties, to observe the process of canvassing absentee and mail-in ballots; and
WHEREAS, the Commonwealth conducted an election on November 3, 2020 for federal offices, including selecting electors for President and Vice President of the United States; and
WHEREAS, officials in the Executive and Judicial Branches of the Commonwealth infringed upon the General Assembly’s authority under the United States Constitution by unlawfully changing the rules governing the November 3, 2020 election in the Commonwealth; and
WHEREAS, on September 17, 2020, less than seven weeks before the November 3, 2020 election, the partisan majority on the Supreme Court of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania unlawfully and unilaterally extended the deadline for mail-in ballots to be received, mandated that ballots mailed without a postmark would be presumed to be received timely, and could be accepted without a verified voter signature; and
WHEREAS, on October 23, 2020, less than two weeks before the November 3, 2020 election and upon a petition from the Secretary of the Commonwealth, the Supreme Court of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania ruled that mail-in ballots need not authenticate signatures for mail-in ballots, thereby treating in-person and mail-in voters dissimilarly and eliminating a critical safeguard against potential election crime; and
WHEREAS, on November 2, 2020, the night before the November 3, 2020 election and prior to the prescribed time for pre-canvassing mail-in ballots, the office of the Secretary of the Commonwealth encouraged certain counties to notify party and candidate representatives of mail-in voters whose ballots contained defects; and
WHEREAS, heavily Democrat counties permitted mail-in voters to cure ballot defects while heavily Republican counties followed the law and invalidated defective ballots; and
WHEREAS, in certain counties in the Commonwealth, watchers were not allowed to meaningfully observe the pre-canvassing and canvassing activities relating to absentee and mail-in ballots; and
WHEREAS, in other parts of the Commonwealth, watchers observed irregularities concerning the pre-canvassing and canvassing of absentee and mail-in ballots; and
WHEREAS, postal employees in Pennsylvania have reported anomalies relating to mail-in ballots, including multiple ballots delivered to a single address with unfamiliar addressees, ballots mailed to vacant homes, empty lots, and addresses that did not exist; and
WHEREAS, witnesses testifying before the Pennsylvania Senate Majority Policy Committee on November 25, 2020 have provided additional compelling information regarding the questionable nature of the administration of the 2020 General Election; and
WHEREAS, these and other actions of the Secretary of the Commonwealth and other election officials and actions taken at their direction or under their purview resulted in great confusion, the inconsistent application of rules and practices across the Commonwealth, insecurity and uncertainty regarding the collection, handling, storage, pre-canvassing, canvassing, counting, tabulation and reporting of votes and has undermined the legitimacy and accuracy of the vote count arising from mail-in ballots in certain counties in the Commonwealth; and
WHEREAS, the actions of the Secretary of the Commonwealth and others have been contrary to the direction of the Pennsylvania General Assembly regarding the conduct of the November 3, 2020 election for presidential electors in the Commonwealth; and
WHEREAS, there remains ongoing litigation concerning the administration of the November 3, 2020 election in the Commonwealth; and
WHEREAS, in 2016, Pennsylvania’s general election results were certified on December 12, 2016, and on November 24, 2020, the Secretary of the Commonwealth unilaterally and prematurely certified results of the November 3, 2020 election regarding presidential electors despite ongoing litigation; and
WHEREAS, the Pennsylvania Senate has the duty to ensure that no citizen of this Commonwealth is disenfranchised, to insist that all elections are conducted according to the law, and to satisfy the general public that every legal vote is counted accurately;
THEREFORE, be it RESOLVED that the Pennsylvania Senate —
1. Recognizes substantial irregularities and improprieties associated with mail-in balloting, pre-canvassing, and canvassing during the November 3, 2020 election; and
2. Finds, based on the facts and evidence presented and our own Board of Elections data, that the Presidential election held on November 3, 2020, in Pennsylvania is irredeemably corrupted; and
3. Disapproves of the infringement on the General Assembly’s sole authority pursuant to the United States Constitution to regulate the selection of Electoral College delegates; and
4. Disapproves of and rejects the Secretary of the Commonwealth’s premature certification of the results of the November 3, 2020 election regarding presidential electors; and
5. Declares that the selection of presidential electors and other statewide electoral contest results in this Commonwealth is in dispute; and
6. Directs that, pursuant to our authority granted in Article II of the United States Constitution and the numerous illegal acts committed, encouraged and ignored by the Governor, Secretary of State, and certain election officials, we hereby take back and reserve to the Pennsylvania General Assembly the power to designate Presidential electors for the State of Pennsylvania for the December, 2020 meeting of the Electoral College and withdraw any prior statement or direction to the contrary given by us or any other official or body; and
7. Directs the Secretary of the Commonwealth and the Governor to withdraw and vacate the certification of presidential electors and to delay certification of results in other statewide electoral contests voted on at the 2020 General Election; and
8. Commands all Presidential electors and other officials to act in conformity with this resolution and not interfere with the authority of the Pennsylvania General Assembly under Article II, Section 1, Clause 2 and under Article I, Section 4, Clause 1 of the United States Constitution; and
9. Urges the United States Congress to recognize and count as the State of Pennsylvania’s electoral votes for President and Vice-President only such electoral votes as are certified directly by the Pennsylvania House of Representatives and the Pennsylvania Senate by subsequent resolution.
**********
https://www.legis.state.pa.us/cfdocs/Legis/CSM/showMemoPublic.cfm?chamber=S&SPick=20190&cosponId=32629 (https://www.legis.state.pa.us/cfdocs/Legis/CSM/showMemoPublic.cfm?chamber=S&SPick=20190&cosponId=32629)
8:42 PM · Nov 27, 2020·Twitter Web App
https://twitter.com/SenMastriano/status/1332500049927020545 (https://twitter.com/SenMastriano/status/1332500049927020545)
-
Pennsylvania State Judge Upholds Halt To Certification, Finds Likelihood Mail-In Balloting Procedures Violate PA Constitution
Legal Insurrection, Nov 27, 2020 at 11:00pm, William A. Jacobson
Upholds injunction issued earlier in the week, finds “Petitioners appear to have a viable claim that the mail-in ballot procedures set forth in Act 77 contravene Pa. Const. Article VII Section 14â€
A Pennsylvania state court Judge has issued a preliminary injunction preventing Pennsylvania from taking any further steps to perfect its certification of the election, including but not limited to appointment of electors and transmission of necessary paperwork to the Electoral College, pending further court hearings and rulings. The ruling upholds an injunction from earlier in the week, and is significant because of the findings made in the Opinion released tonight.
The case has been somewhat under the radar, because it doesn’t involve claims of fraud. It appears to be a pretty straight legal argument. This is not the federal court case that has received a lot of press attention and in which the Third Circuit Court of Appeals denied relief.
The issue in this case is whether legislative expansion of absentee balloting to broad mail-in balloting violated the Pennsylvania Constitution. It’s not clear what the relief would be; the petitioners seek to preclude the Secretary of State from transmitting the certification or otherwise perfecting the electoral college selections.
The Judge found, among other things, that the plaintiffs were likely to prevail on their PA constitutional claims, and that the matter was not moot even though PA had “certified†the results, because there were more steps to be taken: [...]
The Judge expressed grave concern as to what a remedy would be if she were to rule the mail-in balloting unconstitutional, so even if she ruled for the petitioners on the merits, it’s not clear if that would change the result: [...]
The Judge concluded:
For all of the above reasons, the Court respectfully submits that the emergency preliminary injunction was properly issued and should be upheld pending an expedited emergency evidentiary hearing
This is not a final ruling on the merits. It’s meant to prevent PA from taking more steps until the court finally rules.
Given how the PA Supreme Court has ruled previously on election matters, expanding procedures beyond what even the legislature adopted, I don’t see how this survives the PA Supreme Court. From there, the next stop is the U.S. Supreme Court where we know John Roberts and the three liberal Justice will defer to the state supreme court. But the Court is now 6-3, so a Roberts defection would not result in a 4-4 deadlock again if the 5 conservative Justices voted together.
Read more: https://legalinsurrection.com/2020/11/pennsylvania-state-judge-halts-certification-finds-likelihood-mail-in-balloting-procedures-violate-pa-constitution/
-
Jenna Ellis Retweeted
Senator Doug Mastriano
@SenMastriano
I proposed a legislative measure today that seeks accountability associated with the 2020 general election. @PASenateGOP
8:42 PM · Nov 27, 2020·Twitter Web App
https://twitter.com/SenMastriano/status/1332500049927020545
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/En4dak5XYAIo9UF?format=jpg&name=medium)
-
Pennsylvania State Judge Upholds Halt To Certification, Finds Likelihood Mail-In Balloting Procedures Violate PA Constitution
Legal Insurrection, Nov 27, 2020 at 11:00pm, William A. Jacobson
Read more: https://legalinsurrection.com/2020/11/pennsylvania-state-judge-halts-certification-finds-likelihood-mail-in-balloting-procedures-violate-pa-constitution/
Mark R. Levin
@marklevinshow
HUGE decision issued by Commonwealth Court Judge Patricia McCullough
https://marklevinshow.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/301/2020/11/Memorandum-Opinion-Filed.pdf
10:29 PM · Nov 27, 2020·Twitter for Android
https://twitter.com/marklevinshow/status/1332527041057595402
-
Mark R. Levin
@marklevinshow
HUGE decision issued by Commonwealth Court Judge Patricia McCullough
https://marklevinshow.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/301/2020/11/Memorandum-Opinion-Filed.pdf
10:29 PM · Nov 27, 2020·Twitter for Android
https://twitter.com/marklevinshow/status/1332527041057595402
Firefox popped up with a security risk warning at the click on the first link. Anyone else get that?
-
Firefox popped up with a security risk warning at the click on the first link. Anyone else get that?
Out of date cert. No biggie if you're sure that's Levin's site. A more significant security issue if it weren't for the fact that the site is big and well known.
-
Out of date cert. No biggie if you're sure that's Levin's site. A more significant security issue if it weren't for the fact that the site is big and well known.
It's blocking a .pdf version of the judgement in PA upholding the injunction. I got it.
-
https://legalinsurrection.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/Kelly-v.-Pennsylvania-Injunction-Halting-Certification-Memorandum-Opinion-Filed-11-27-2020.pdf (https://legalinsurrection.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/Kelly-v.-Pennsylvania-Injunction-Halting-Certification-Memorandum-Opinion-Filed-11-27-2020.pdf)
MEMORANDUM OPINION BY JUDGE McCULLOUGH FILED:November 27, 2020
As this Court’s November 25, 2020,Order of an Emergency Preliminary Injunction has been appealed to the Pennsylvania Supreme Court, this opinion shall set forth the basis for said Order and shall also satisfy the requirements of Rule 1925 of the Pennsylvania Rules of Appellate Procedure,Pa.R.A.P. 1925.The overarching consideration for the emergency preliminary injunction pending the evidentiary hearings scheduled for November 27, 2020 is the compelling exigencies raised in this case which are of statewide and national concern.Petitioners raise matters that go to the core of the electoral process and involve the constitutionality of how the citizens of this Commonwealth may cast their votes, not only for the offices sought by Petitioners, but also,for the office of president and vice president of the United States of America as well as statewide, regional and local offices.On November 21, 2020, the Honorable Mike Kelly, Sean Parnell, Thomas A. Frank, Nancy Kierzek, Derek Magee, Robin Sauter, Michael Kincaid, and Wanda Logan (collectively, Petitioners), filed a Complaint for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief in this Court against the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, the Pennsylvania General Assembly, the Honorable Thomas W. Wolf, and Kathy Boockvar (collectively, Respondents), which this Court indicated it would treat as a petition for review addressed to the Court’s original jurisdiction (Petition). In the Petition, Petitioners allege that the Act of October 31, 2019, P.L. 552, No. 77 (Act 77), which added and amended various absentee and mail-in voting provisions in the Pennsylvania Election Code (Election Code),1is unconstitutional and void ab initio because it purportedly contravenes the requirements of the Pennsylvania Constitution. Petitioners allege that Article VII, section 14 of the Pennsylvania Constitution provides two exclusive mechanisms by which a qualified elector may cast his or her vote in an election: (1) by submitting his or her vote in propria persona at the polling place on election day; and (2) by submitting an absentee ballot, but only if the qualified voter satisfies the conditions precedent to meet the requirements of one of the four, limited exclusive circumstances under which absentee voting is authorized under the Pennsylvania constitution. (Petition, ¶16.) Petitioners allege that mail-in voting in the form implemented through Act 77 is an attempt by the legislature to fundamentally overhaul the Pennsylvania voting system and permit universal, no-excuse, mail-in voting absent any constitutional authority. Id., ¶17. Petitioners argue that in order to amend the Constitution, mandatory procedural requirements must be strictly followed. Specifically, pursuant to Article XI, Section 1, a proposed constitutional amendment must be approved by a majority vote of the members of both the Pennsylvania House of Representatives and Senate in two consecutive legislative sessions, then the proposed amendment must be published for three months ahead of the next general election in two newspapers in each county, and finally it must be submitted to the qualified electors as a ballot question in the next general election and approved by a majority of those voting on the amendment. According to Petitioners, the legislature did not follow the necessary procedures for amending the Constitution before enacting Act 77 which created a new category of mail-in voting; therefore, the mail-in ballot scheme under Act 77 is unconstitutional on its face and must be struck down. Id., ¶¶27, 35-37. As relief, Petitioners seek, inter alia, a declaration and/or injunction that prohibits Respondents from certifying the November 2020 General Election results, which include mail-in ballots that are permitted on a statewide basis and are allegedly improper becauseAct 77is unconstitutional.
More at link.
-
Jenna Ellis Retweeted
Breitbart News
@BreitbartNews
Here's what a Pennsylvania data scientist and fraud expert says he saw as a poll watcher:
Video: https://twitter.com/BreitbartNews/status/1332682355258101762
8:46 AM · Nov 28, 2020·SocialFlow
-
Jenna Ellis
@JennaEllisEsq
PA @senatorscarnati: “We will not sit back quietly and allow the liberal left to steal the 2020 election. The foundation of our democracy demands that all elections are fair and legal.â€
PA Senate GOP
@PASenateGOP
Nov 26
#PASenate President Pro Tempore @SenatorScarnati: PA Supreme Court Fails to Uphold the Law to Ensure Fair Elections
https://pasenategop.com/blog/pa-supreme-court-fails-to-uphold-the-law-to-ensure-fair-elections/
11:27 PM · Nov 27, 2020·Twitter for iPhone
https://twitter.com/JennaEllisEsq/status/1332541520549982208
-
Judge rules pro-Trump case established a ‘likelihood to succeed on the merits’ in Pennsylvania
The Pennsylvania appellate court judge who issued a temporary injunction Wednesday against the state certifying its 2020 election results released an accompanying opinion Friday explaining her decision.
In the opinion, Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court Judge Patricia McCullough predicted that the plaintiffs in the case will ultimately win the battle they’re waging in the Keystone State.
“Petitioners appear to have established a likelihood to succeed on the merits because petitioners have asserted the Constitution does not provide a mechanism for the legislature to allow for expansion of absentee voting without a constitutional amendment,â€she wrote.
more
https://www.bizpacreview.com/2020/11/28/judge-rules-trumps-case-established-a-likelihood-to-succeed-on-the-merits-in-pennsylvania-1000222 (https://www.bizpacreview.com/2020/11/28/judge-rules-trumps-case-established-a-likelihood-to-succeed-on-the-merits-in-pennsylvania-1000222)
-
More
BREAKING: Pennsylvania Judge Claims PA Election is Most-Likely Unconstitutional, Predicts Trump Case Will "Succeed"
https://trendingpolitics.com/breaking-pennsylvania-judge-claims-pa-election-is-most-likely-unconstitutional-predicts-trump-case-will-succeed/
-
More
BREAKING: Pennsylvania Judge Claims PA Election is Most-Likely Unconstitutional, Predicts Trump Case Will "Succeed"
https://trendingpolitics.com/breaking-pennsylvania-judge-claims-pa-election-is-most-likely-unconstitutional-predicts-trump-case-will-succeed/
Impossible. The reports in the MSM say Trump has only failed lawsuits and ashes in his mouth.
-
BREAKING: Pennsylvania Judge Claims PA Election is Most-Likely Unconstitutional, Predicts Trump Case Will "Succeed"
https://trendingpolitics.com/breaking-pennsylvania-judge-claims-pa-election-is-most-likely-unconstitutional-predicts-trump-case-will-succeed/
@mystery-ak
@Cyber Liberty
I agree. No election law should be changed close to an election as it screws up everything, and it appears, in Penns. case, it takes a constitutional change.
We can all see the mess that has happened due to Penn. changing the "rules" "laws" close to an election regarding MAIL BALLOTS. These laws are not well known anyway, and changing them quickly close to an election, makes sure there will be a crisis.
-
The Pennsylvania supreme court threw out the lower courts ruling with prejudice...
https://trulytimes.com/pennsylvania-supreme-court-overturns-block-on-certification-of-election-results.html
-
BREAKING: The PA Supreme Court just vacated the entire @SeanParnellUSA case - expect it to go to SCOTUS in short order. Article incoming with analysis from @reeveslawstl— Tracy Beanz (@tracybeanz) November 28, 2020
It’s not over.
This was not unexpected.
Stay tuned. https://t.co/1H3M0UVnMi— Sean Parnell (@SeanParnellUSA) November 28, 2020
-
Mark R. Levin @marklevinshow
1. The rogue PA Supreme Court is the most detestable court in the land. The Democrat majority doesn’t even pretend to sit as justices.
7:08 PM · Nov 28, 2020
-
Mark R. Levin @marklevinshow
2. They’re political hacks in black robes who have destroyed PA’s election system, unconstitutionally seized power from the state legislature, and sits as a Democrat-Party politburo.
7:08 PM · Nov 28, 2020
Mark R. Levin @marklevinshow
3. Rather than uphold the federal and state constitutions, it has shredded them. Stalinism lives.
7:08 PM · Nov 28, 2020
-
Mark R. Levin @marklevinshow
2. They’re political hacks in black robes who have destroyed PA’s election system, unconstitutionally seized power from the state legislature, and sits as a Democrat-Party politburo.
7:08 PM · Nov 28, 2020
Mark R. Levin @marklevinshow
3. Rather than uphold the federal and state constitutions, it has shredded them. Stalinism lives.
7:08 PM · Nov 28, 2020
Well said,Mr Levin!
-
BREAKING: The PA Supreme Court just vacated the entire @SeanParnellUSA case - expect it to go to SCOTUS in short order. Article incoming with analysis from @reeveslawstl— Tracy Beanz (@tracybeanz) November 28, 2020
It’s not over.
This was not unexpected.
Stay tuned. https://t.co/1H3M0UVnMi— Sean Parnell (@SeanParnellUSA) November 28, 2020
Show time!
-
Mark R. Levin
@marklevinshow
Exactly
Earlier this evening, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court issued a brief, three-page order dismissing an election lawsuit brought by Sean Parnell and several other qualified Pennsylvania voters challenging the constitutionality of Pennsylvania’s recently-enacted state law governing mail-in voting. In doing so, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court also vacated a lower court judge’s preliminary injunction preventing the Pennsylvania Secretary of State from certifying the results of the 2020 General Election pending resolution of the lawsuit.
In dismissing the lawsuit, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court did so on the narrowest of grounds: that Parnell and the other voters waited too long to file it. By styling their decision thus, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court avoided having to decide the case on the actual merits: Is the Pennsylvania mail-in voting law unconstitutional under the Pennsylvania state constitution? As we shall see below, the answer is most likely “yes.â€
The Pennsylvania Constitution and Voting Law
The Pennsylvania constitution allows absentee voting under five situations: (1) work; (2) illness; (3) physical disability; (4) the election occurring on a religious holiday; or (5) a person’s election-day duties themselves preventing the person from voting in person. No other justifications are allowed for absentee voting under the Pennsylvania constitution.
Towards the end of 2019, a majority of both houses of the Pennsylvania General Assembly passed the relevant mail-in voting legislation at issue here. As I discussed in my previous two articles, this legislation expanded voting by mail beyond the above-five situations under the Pennsylvania constitution to include any situation. In other words, the law purported to allow voting by mail for any reason whatsoever.
But while the General Assembly passed the legislation, this was not, in and of itself, sufficient to amend the Pennsylvania constitution and expand voting by mail beyond the above-five circumstances. To amount to a constitutional amendment, the Pennsylvania constitution requires that the law be passed a second time by a majority vote of both houses of the General Assembly in the next legislative assembly. Once that is done, a majority of Pennsylvania voters then have to approve the mail-in voting legislation in a statewide election.
The above process has not taken place. Indeed, the Pennsylvania General Assembly itself appears to have recognized that such an expansion of mail-in voting would have to come about via a constitutional amendment, as the law itself was originally presented as a joint resolution proposing an amendment to the Pennsylvania Constitution.
The Parnell Lawsuit
Parnell and the other voters brought suit on November 21, 2020, in the Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, seeking a declaration that the mail-in voting law is unconstitutional and an injunction barring the Pennsylvania Secretary of State from certifying the results of the General Election until the lawsuit was completed. The Commonwealth Court granted a preliminary injunction, finding that a substantial likelihood existed that the mail-in voting legislation did, in fact, violate the Pennsylvania Constitution.
The Pennsylvania Secretary of State immediately appealed the preliminary injunction to the Pennsylvania Supreme Court. Earlier today, that court entered an order both dissolving the preliminary injunction and dismissing the entire lawsuit. The only reason it gave for doing so was that Parnell and the other voters had waited too long to bring their lawsuit, and could not do so now, with the electoral college deadline being so close. The Pennsylvania Supreme Court did not address the fact that the mail-in voting legislation had not been passed in such a manner as to amend the Pennsylvania constitution.
What Happens Next?
If other lawsuit litigation is any predictor, Parnell and the other voters will now seek an expedited petition for a writ of certiorari. They will most likely also apply to Justice Alito—as Circuit Justice for the Third Circuit—for an emergency injunction barring the Pennsylvania Secretary of State from certifying the results of the election pending resolution of the cert petition. To obtain the Court’s review, Parnell and the other voters must show that the Pennsylvania Supreme Court’s decision somehow violates federal law. While the Pennsylvania Supreme Court’s decision is rooted in state law, a good argument can be made that it involves a federal question.
In interpreting the legislative power within the context of selecting Presidential Electors, the Supreme Court of the United States has held, “What is forbidden or required to be done by a state is forbidden or required of the legislative power under the state constitutions as they exist.†McPherson v. Blacker, 146 U.S. 1, 25 (1892). In other words, the “legislative power†to select Presidential Electors includes those limitations that state constitutions place on its legislatures—in this case, the Pennsylvania state constitution’s limiting of absentee voting to the above five situations. This may constitute a viable federal question for the Supreme Court of the United States to intervene. And while McPherson dates from 1892, its rationale is sound, and the Court has cited it as recently as 2015. See Ariz. State Legislature v. Ariz. Indep. Redistricting Comm’n, 576 U.S. 787, 839 (2015).
The other question is what weight, if any, the Supreme Court of the United States will give to Parnell’s supposed delay in bringing the lawsuit. I will admit that this is an area I have not examined much, and so I will refrain from commenting on it for the time being. But this much, at least, seems clear to me: the Pennsylvania mail-in voting law is unconstitutional.
https://uncoverdc.com/2020/11/28/case-dismissed-analysis-of-decision-in-pennsylvanias-parnell-case/
10:32 PM · Nov 28, 2020·Twitter for Android
https://twitter.com/marklevinshow/status/1332890198330519555
-
Interesting. I was under the impression that you had to be hurt to holler, so to speak. Suits brought to question the eligibility of one Barrack Obama for office of President were routinely dismissed, not because of the time that had passed, but on issues of "standing"--in short, the plaintiffs could show no injury, thus had no standing to pursue the matter.
I was under the impression that an injured Party had up to two years to sue for damages, and in this case, the law being passed, and the changes unconstitutionally made did not cause injury for roughly a year. Once injury could be claimed (a violation of one man/one vote equal protection), the suit proceeded quickly and well within the two year period usually limiting suits for damages, and also within two years of the law being passed, meeting standing and time frame.
Considering it has been less than a month since that damage was incurred, and less than two years since the changes were (unconstitutionally) made, the premise on which the PA Supreme Court has dismissed the case (with prejudice, no less) is flawed.
The injury at issue as a result of a prima facie unconstitutional law is less than 30 days old, and regardless of age, the constitutionality of the law is the issue, and it would remain unconstitutional (along with any actions taken under it which superseded the constitutional constraints) no matter how much time had passed.
-
We've got ourselves a fighter in PA ... pointing-down
Senator Doug Mastriano
@SenMastriano
My proposal - SR410 - rejects Secretary Boockvar's premature certification of the presidential election, overturns the certification and – among other components – designates lawmakers with the authority to award presidential electors. @PASenateGOP
https://www.legis.state.pa.us/cfdocs/billinfo/billinfo.cfm?syear=2019&sind=0&body=S&type=R&bn=0410 (https://www.legis.state.pa.us/cfdocs/billinfo/billinfo.cfm?syear=2019&sind=0&body=S&type=R&bn=0410)
8:06 PM · Nov 30, 2020·Twitter Web App
https://twitter.com/SenMastriano/status/1333578227890221056 (https://twitter.com/SenMastriano/status/1333578227890221056)
-
Senator Doug Mastriano
@SenMastriano
President Trump called during my interview with @ericmetaxas and reviewed our hearing. Listen below:
Video: https://twitter.com/SenMastriano/status/1333545380965986307 (https://twitter.com/SenMastriano/status/1333545380965986307)
5:56 PM · Nov 30, 2020·Twitter for iPhone
Via YouTube:
Error 404 (Not Found)!!1 (http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=youtu.be&v=c3MAz7Pvp_o&app=desktop#)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=youtu.be&v=c3MAz7Pvp_o&app=desktop (https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=youtu.be&v=c3MAz7Pvp_o&app=desktop)
-
Pennsylvania Lawmakers Formally Introduce Resolution to Dispute 2020 Election Results
Epoch Times, Nov 30, 2020
https://www.theepochtimes.com/pennsylvania-lawmakers-formally-introduce-resolution-to-dispute-2020-elections-results_3599100.html?utm_source=newsnoe&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=breaking-2020-11-30-3 (https://www.theepochtimes.com/pennsylvania-lawmakers-formally-introduce-resolution-to-dispute-2020-elections-results_3599100.html?utm_source=newsnoe&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=breaking-2020-11-30-3)
-
We've got ourselves a fighter in PA ... pointing-down
Senator Doug Mastriano
@SenMastriano
My proposal - SR410 - rejects Secretary Boockvar's premature certification of the presidential election, overturns the certification and – among other components – designates lawmakers with the authority to award presidential electors. @PASenateGOP
https://www.legis.state.pa.us/cfdocs/billinfo/billinfo.cfm?syear=2019&sind=0&body=S&type=R&bn=0410 (https://www.legis.state.pa.us/cfdocs/billinfo/billinfo.cfm?syear=2019&sind=0&body=S&type=R&bn=0410)
8:06 PM · Nov 30, 2020·Twitter Web App
https://twitter.com/SenMastriano/status/1333578227890221056 (https://twitter.com/SenMastriano/status/1333578227890221056)
This is the State Senator who was meeting with the President last week in the Oval Office and had to leave because he was informed he tested positive for COVID 19.
I'm starting to think the Chinese have really fine-tuned the weaponization of this damn virus and the Marxists here have learned to transport it.
-
This is the State Senator who was meeting with the President last week in the Oval Office and had to leave because he was informed he tested positive for COVID 19.
I'm starting to think the Chinese have really fine-tuned the weaponization of this damn virus and the Marxists here have learned to transport it.
They don't need to weaponize the virus any further, the MSM has seen to the panic with the help of people who knew this virus long before it 'got out'.
The thing to 'weaponize' (and I believe this is being done) is the testing and test results, which can immobilize people, businesses, witnesses, and a nation.
In my state, COVID-19 only has a 98.8% survival rate (not counting the people who died with the virus and not of it.
-
(https://media.thedonald.win/post/qLJznuyD.png)
-
Donald J. Trump
@realDonaldTrump
Jesse Morgan—a truck driver (subcontractor) with USPS in PENNSYLVANIA...
Video: https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1333875814585282567
3:49 PM · Dec 1, 2020·Twitter for iPhone
-
Paging AG Barr ... Please pick up the white courtesy phone ~~~
Team Trump
@TeamTrump
Colonel Shaffer on USPS subcontractor Jesse Morgan's story of 280,000 ballots shipped from Bethpage, NY to Lancaster, PA: "We have evidence of a MASSIVE transfer of completed, curated ballots ready to be injected into counting centers."
Video: https://twitter.com/TeamTrump/status/1333875528009453574
3:48 PM · Dec 1, 2020·Twitter Media Studio
-
More for you, Mr. Barr ~~
Team Trump
@TeamTrump
Corroborated eyewitness testimony: 130,000 - 280,000 completed ballots were shipped from Bethpage, NY to Lancaster, PA; the ballots and trailer then disappeared
Video: https://twitter.com/TeamTrump/status/1333860114734977026
2:46 PM · Dec 1, 2020·Twitter Media Studio
-
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EoL-6HSXEAAn2P-?format=jpg&name=4096x4096)
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EoL-6wIW8AIk4kl?format=png&name=4096x4096)
-
Prayers up for the good Sen. Cruz. May his argument impress and persuade the court by the force of its righteousness. Amen.
-
Prayers up for the good Sen. Cruz. May his argument impress and persuade the court by the force of its righteousness. Amen.
Amen, Amen and Amen!!
-
Team Trump
@TeamTrump
.
@JennaEllisEsq: Over 200,000 ballots are suspect and were counted illegally in Pennsylvania
Video: https://twitter.com/TeamTrump/status/1334139492723269638
9:16 AM · Dec 2, 2020·Twitter Media Studio
-
Mark R. Levin
@marklevinshow
WOW. Letter from over 76 members of the PA legislature asking Congress to reject PA’s electors. The focus is on multiple violations of Article II, Sec. 1, Cl. 2 by the Democrat Governor and Democrat Secretary of State.
http://www.pahousegopnews.com/AttachedFiles/12.04.20%20Congress%20Election%202020.pdf (http://www.pahousegopnews.com/AttachedFiles/12.04.20%20Congress%20Election%202020.pdf)
5:05 PM · Dec 4, 2020·Twitter for Android
https://twitter.com/marklevinshow/status/1334982225088159744 (https://twitter.com/marklevinshow/status/1334982225088159744)
-
Jonathan Lai
🙊
è³´æŸç¾½
@Elaijuh
·
2h
PA GOP lawmakers: “3 U.S.C. §15, empowers Congress to reject electoral votes that are not ‘regularly given’ or ‘lawfully certified.’ The aforementioned conduct has undermined the lawful certification of Pennsylvania’s delegation to the Electoral College.â€
Jonathan Lai
🙊
è³´æŸç¾½
@Elaijuh
·
2h
The PA GOP lawmakers also sent a letter calling on @JoshShapiroPA
“to appoint an independent prosecutor to review these election irregularities, to ensure the statutes governing our elections were not violated, and to make recommendations to [legislature]â€
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Eoa7izTW8A4W-eP?format=png&name=small)
-
Mark R. Levin
@marklevinshow
WOW. Letter from over 76 members of the PA legislature asking Congress to reject PA’s electors. The focus is on multiple violations of Article II, Sec. 1, Cl. 2 by the Democrat Governor and Democrat Secretary of State.
http://www.pahousegopnews.com/AttachedFiles/12.04.20%20Congress%20Election%202020.pdf (http://www.pahousegopnews.com/AttachedFiles/12.04.20%20Congress%20Election%202020.pdf)
5:05 PM · Dec 4, 2020·Twitter for Android
https://twitter.com/marklevinshow/status/1334982225088159744 (https://twitter.com/marklevinshow/status/1334982225088159744)
Out of 253 Members.
-
Alito Responds To Appeal Asking To Block Biden Win In PA
Jon Brown • Dec 4, 2020
Justice Samuel Alito agreed on Thursday to review an appeal against the ruling of the Pennsylvania Supreme Court that tossed a suit alleging the state’s mail-in voting was unconstitutional.
Rep. Mike Kelly (R-PA) and other plaintiffs appealed to Alito to block Pennsylvania from certifying the battleground state’s electoral votes for Democratic nominee Joe Biden, according to The Associated Press. The plaintiffs argue that Pennsylvania’s mail-in voting was inherently unconstitutional because it required a constitutional amendment to be authorized.
Alito set Dec. 9 as the date for state officials to respond. That date is a day after the “safe harbor deadline.†After Dec. 8, Congress cannot challenge any electors named according to state law.
https://www.dailywire.com/news/alito-responds-to-appeal-asking-to-block-biden-win-in-pa (https://www.dailywire.com/news/alito-responds-to-appeal-asking-to-block-biden-win-in-pa)
-
Pennsylvania Gov. Says No Special Session Needed, ‘Time to Move on’ From Election
https://www.theepochtimes.com/pennsylvania-gov-says-no-special-session-needed-time-to-move-on-from-election_3605413.html (https://www.theepochtimes.com/pennsylvania-gov-says-no-special-session-needed-time-to-move-on-from-election_3605413.html)
-
Wolf also wrote on Twitter that, “President Trump’s own attorney general said there was no widespread fraud.â€
Now you know why Barr's perfidy is so important to the Swamp. Not just slow walking investigations and running out the clock.
-
Now you know why Barr's perfidy is so important to the Swamp. Not just slow walking investigations and running out the clock.
And all the clarifications and restatements by DOJ following Barr’s comments, never make breaking news nor instill much confidence that 2020 election fraud will receive the urgency it deserves.
-
And all the clarifications and restatements by DOJ following Barr’s comments, never make breaking news nor instill much confidence that 2020 election fraud will receive the urgency it deserves.
If you have any information that shows they are 'on it', please pass it on. I'm almost ready to go rummaging through Q drops...
-
If you have any information that shows they are 'on it', please pass it on. I'm almost ready to go rummaging through Q drops...
They are on it for sure! Hundreds of DOJ lawyers holding up rugs while thousands more man the brooms!
-
They are on it for sure! Hundreds of DOJ lawyers holding up rugs while thousands more man the brooms!
I meant 'On it" as in pursuing the fraudsters. Not "IN on it", which I suspect.
-
Alito Demands Briefs in Pennsylvania Congressman’s Lawsuit to Flip the Election (UPDATED)
https://lawandcrime.com/2020-election/alito-demands-briefs-in-pennsylvania-congressmans-lawsuit-to-flip-the-election/
-
Tammy Bruce
@HeyTammyBruce
Pennsylvania: Alito Moves Up Response Date on Emergency Application To 12/8 "So what is this about? More mind-reading: It takes the “safe harbor†issue off the table if that were an impediment to SCOTUS issuing a substantive ruling."
https://legalinsurrection.com/2020/12/pennsylvania-alito-moves-up-response-date-on-emergency-application-to-12-8/ via
@LegInsurrection
1:25 PM · Dec 6, 2020·Twitter Web App
https://twitter.com/HeyTammyBruce/status/1335651500480229376
-
Mark R. Levin
@marklevinshow
1. And so the endless surmising goes on. But why would Alito and/or the Court take up the Pennsylvania matter at all if the intention is simply to quickly deep-six it? I make no predictions, but it is a very solid and substantive case, regardless of what the Court might do.
2. It raises serious constitutional issues. It is not a fraud case.
9:04 AM · Dec 7, 2020·Twitter for Android
https://twitter.com/marklevinshow/status/1335948355621548036
-
Ted Cruz
@tedcruz
If #SCOTUS grants cert in the PA election case, I have told the petitioners I will stand ready to present the oral argument.
Full statement below...
Video: https://twitter.com/tedcruz/status/1336049002949857284
3:44 PM · Dec 7, 2020·Twitter Ads
-
Ted Cruz
@tedcruz
If #SCOTUS grants cert in the PA election case, I have told the petitioners I will stand ready to present the oral argument.
Full statement below...
Video: https://twitter.com/tedcruz/status/1336049002949857284
3:44 PM · Dec 7, 2020·Twitter Ads
Ted Cruz has pleaded cases before SCOTUS more than a couple of times.
-
At the last minute, Pennsylvania FINALLY filed their brief, as requested by SCOTUS, and this is basically what they came up with... (media.thedonald.win)
(https://media.thedonald.win/post/osiIbHyA.jpeg)
-
At the last minute, Pennsylvania FINALLY filed their brief, as requested by SCOTUS, and this is basically what they came up with... (media.thedonald.win)
(https://media.thedonald.win/post/osiIbHyA.jpeg)
For the comfort and convenience of the court, such briefs should be printed on a good grade of two ply bathroom tissue.
-
Donald J. Trump
@realDonaldTrump
(Levin mail-in ballots) Video: https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1336376821617725449
1:27 PM · Dec 8, 2020·Twitter for iPhone
-
Joe Nierman (Parler: @JoeNierman)
@NiermanJoe
Vocal dissension in the ranks-
TX v. PA
PA Speaker of the House, Bryan Cutler was joined by PA House majority leader, Kerry Benninghoff in filing an amici curiae brief AGAINST the State of Pennsylvania and in favor of Texas' application for relief.
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Eo5xu6rXcAE9p9s?format=jpg&name=medium)
3:24 PM · Dec 10, 2020·Twitter for Android
https://twitter.com/NiermanJoe/status/1337131195512082435
-
Senator Doug Mastriano
@SenMastriano
Honored to be among the 24 PA Senators that are part of the amicus in support of the Texas case going before the US Supreme Court.
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Eo6FGdDXEAEcmcZ?format=jpg&name=360x360) (https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Eo6FGdCXYAAPMMG?format=jpg&name=360x360)
4:49 PM · Dec 10, 2020·Twitter for iPhone
https://twitter.com/SenMastriano/status/1337152538450255873
-
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EpN8qeGXUAAANWx?format=jpg&name=medium)
-
Team Trump
@TeamTrump
BREAKING: Trump campaign files a petition for writ of certiorari to the US. Supreme Court to reverse a trio of Pennsylvania Supreme Court cases which illegally changed Pennsylvania’s mail balloting law immediately before and after the 2020 presidential election.
2:33 PM · Dec 20, 2020·Twitter Web App
https://twitter.com/TeamTrump/status/1340742093006761985
-
Jenna Ellis
@JennaEllisEsq
Read the petition filed by the @TeamTrump Campaign to the U.S. Supreme Court.
https://cdn.donaldjtrump.com/public-files/press_assets/trump-v-boockvar-petition.pdf
2:38 PM · Dec 20, 2020·Twitter for iPhone
https://twitter.com/JennaEllisEsq/status/1340743511985950721
-
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EptFzs3WMAEYw63?format=jpg&name=large)
-
Methinks we're about to find out just how rogue our Supreme Court is.
-
Methinks we're about to find out just how rogue our Supreme Court is.
@Right_in_Virginia
Or find out who is "Real" and who is bought/blackmailed and paid for.
-
Methinks we're about to find out just how rogue our Supreme Court is.
I thought we already found that out.
-
I thought we already found that out.
:yowsa: And you were right about that!
-
@Right_in_Virginia
Or find out who is "Real" and who is bought/blackmailed and paid for.
And who is too afraid of his or her shadow to oppose Roberts @sneakypete
-
I thought we already found that out.
I was speaking from my last, flickering flame of hope @Cyber Liberty
-
I was speaking from my last, flickering flame of hope @Cyber Liberty
Ah! I can relate. The courts have washed their hands of it, and that was my last hope. there is no way the Pubbies in the Senate and the House will ever do anything. They'll raise the objection to the EC vote, and then it will die a quick death. :shrug:
-
Ah! I can relate. The courts have washed their hands of it, and that was my last hope. there is no way the Pubbies in the Senate and the House will ever do anything. They'll raise the objection to the EC vote, and then it will die a quick death. :shrug:
@Cyber Liberty
Seems to me at this point it is most likely up to the unwashed masses to either rise up and take control back from the globalists while we are still a sovereign nation,or to just bend over,grab our ankles,and learn to speak Chinese.
-
Harsh but Mostly Thoughtful John McGrath
@jfmcg21
(https://abs-0.twimg.com/emoji/v2/svg/1f6a8.svg) Who’s having lunch with @realDonaldTrump today?
The Entire GOP Caucus from the PA State Legislature
10:22 AM · Dec 23, 2020·Twitter for iPhone
https://twitter.com/jfmcg21/status/1341766125005250561
-
MG Show
@intheMatrixxx
Breaking News: Pennsylvania's own election data ported straight from the government site found 191,725 ballot records were edited or fixed AFTER election day.
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Ep71DUkXUAMguSh?format=jpg&name=small)
11:14 AM · Dec 23, 2020·Twitter for iPhone
https://twitter.com/intheMatrixxx/status/1341779180304936961
-
Supreme Court Fails to Immediately Act on Trump Campaign’s Request to Expedite Pennsylvania Appeal
Epoch Times, Dec 23, 2020
The Supreme Court on Wednesday docketed an appeal filed by President Donald Trump’s campaign that seeks to reverse cases by a state court but did not immediately act on the campaign’s request to expedite the case.
Instead, the top court’s docket shows a Jan. 22, 2021. deadline—two days after the presidential inauguration day—for when the state is required to respond to the request for appeal.
The campaign filed the suit on Monday challenging three Pennsylvania Supreme Court rulings that “illegally changed†the mail-in ballot laws “immediately before and after the 2020 presidential election,†the legal team said.
https://www.theepochtimes.com/supreme-court-fails-to-immediately-act-on-trump-campaigns-request-to-expedite-pennsylvania-appeal_3630045.html (https://www.theepochtimes.com/supreme-court-fails-to-immediately-act-on-trump-campaigns-request-to-expedite-pennsylvania-appeal_3630045.html)
-
Another day, another stab in the back by a lawless SCOTUS.
-
Another day, another stab in the back by a lawless SCOTUS.
It should by now be evident to anyone paying any attention at all that the swamp has overcome the Constitution, we are no longer a nation of laws, and thus the union is desolved. Welcome to the newly minted Banana republic!
Merry Christmas!
-
It should by now be evident to anyone paying any attention at all that the swamp has overcome the Constitution, we are no longer a nation of laws, and thus the union is desolved. Welcome to the newly minted Banana republic!
Merry Christmas!
Just finished watching an episode of Star Trek DS9 where the Dominion was making deep inroads into the Alpha Quadrant, and where world after world was compliantly signing a Non Aggression pact with the Dominion in the face of mounting threats from the Dominion’s menacing Jem'’Hadar forces. It was shaping up to be a “peaceful†takeover of the Alpha Quadrant, it seemed.
Meanwhile, Deep Space 9 has been observing waves of Jem'’Hadar troop convoys entering the Alpha Quadrant through the wormhole every week. What to do?
Finally, Starfleet orders Sisko to mine the entrance to the wormhole and stop any more Dominion convoys from entering the Alpha Quadrant. But, Odo notes that if the Federation tries to stop those convoys, “it may very well start a war.â€
Sisko looks around at his officers in the briefing room and intones, “Maybe so...but one thing is certain. We’re losing the peace, which means a war could be our only hope.â€
And a Merry Christmas to you, too, @Bigun
-
In my judgment, the following is 100% spot on!
As Alexander Hamilton explained in Federalist No. 78, courts have “neither FORCE nor WILL, but merely judgment.†As such, in deciding cases courts have a duty to explain their decisions so the rest of us may know if they constitute arbitrary exercises of political power, or reasoned decisions of judicial power which the People can trust. In Texas v. Pennsylvania, all that the justices felt obligated to do was to state its — “lack of standing†— supported by a one sentence justification: “Texas has not demonstrated a judicially cognizable interest in the manner in which another State conducts its election.†Resolving a case of this magnitude with one conclusory sentence is completely unacceptable.
The Supreme Court docket consists primarily of only those cases the High Court chooses to hear. However, just like when it agrees to decide a case, and in disputes where the original jurisdiction of the Court is invoked, it has a duty to decide cases properly brought to them. Two centuries ago, Chief Justice John Marshall construed the obligation of contracts clause in a decision where he wrote: “however irksome the task may be, this is a duty from which we dare not shrink.†Trustees of Dartmouth College v. Woodward, 17 U.S. 518 (1819). Courts have a duty to resolve important cases even if they would prefer to avoid them. In Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. 137 (1803), Marshall described “the duty of the Judicial Department to say what the law is†because “every right, when withheld, must have a remedy, and every injury its proper redress.†Abdication in a case of this sort is not a judicial option.
The Supreme Court’s reliance on standing as its excuse has had one positive result — provoking many to study the origins of that doctrine who may be surprised to learn that the word “standing†nowhere appears in the Constitution. There is compelling evidence to demonstrate it was birthed by big-government Justices during the FDR Administration to shield New Deal legislation, and to insulate the Administrative State from challenges by the People. Those who favored the Texas decision argue that standing is a conservative doctrine as it limits the power of the courts — but the true constitutionalist uses only tests grounded in its text. The true threshold constitutional test is whether a genuine and serious “controversy†exists between the States that could be resolved by a court.
The only reason given by the Supreme Court was: “Texas has not demonstrated a judicially cognizable interest in the manner in which another State conducts its election.†In truth, Texas did make such a showing. When Pennsylvania violated the exclusive authority bestowed on state legislators in the Constitution’s Electors Clause, it opened the door to corruption and foreign intrigue to corrupt the electoral votes of Pennsylvania, and as Alexander Hamilton explained in Federalist 68, that is exactly why the Framers created the Electoral College. During the 2020 election cycle, changes to the election process in Pennsylvania were made by judges, state office holders and election officials which would never have been made by its state legislature.
If the process by which Presidential Electors are chosen is corrupted in a few key states, like Pennsylvania, Georgia, Michigan and Wisconsin by rigging the system in favor of one candidate, it becomes wholly irrelevant who the People of Texas support. That political reality presents a real “judicially cognizable interest†no matter what the Supreme Court decided. What happens in Pennsylvania does not stay in Pennsylvania, as electors from all States acting together select the President of the United States.
In the Federalist Papers, both James Madison and Alexander Hamilton recognized the need to combat “the spirit of faction†and the tendency of each State to yield to its immediate interest at the expense of national unity. They reasoned that the Constitution provided a solution to this centrifugal pressure while reserving a measure of sovereignty to each State. When differences arise between States that threaten to lead to disunion, the Republic can be held together, as Hamilton observed, either “by the agency of the Courts or by military force.†A constitutional remedy to enable the States to resolve their differences peacefully is the provision that permits any State to invoke the original jurisdiction of the Supreme Court to address and settle their differences.
In the vernacular, the Supreme Court blew it, threatening the bonds that hold the union together.
Excerpted from: https://www.westernjournal.com/twj-exclusive-bombshell-new-legal-memo-giving-trump-supporters-hope-christmas-eve/ (https://www.westernjournal.com/twj-exclusive-bombshell-new-legal-memo-giving-trump-supporters-hope-christmas-eve/)
-
Supreme Court Fails to Immediately Act on Trump Campaign’s Request to Expedite Pennsylvania Appeal
Epoch Times, Dec 23, 2020
The Supreme Court on Wednesday docketed an appeal filed by President Donald Trump’s campaign that seeks to reverse cases by a state court but did not immediately act on the campaign’s request to expedite the case.
Instead, the top court’s docket shows a Jan. 22, 2021. deadline—two days after the presidential inauguration day—for when the state is required to respond to the request for appeal.
The campaign filed the suit on Monday challenging three Pennsylvania Supreme Court rulings that “illegally changed†the mail-in ballot laws “immediately before and after the 2020 presidential election,†the legal team said.
https://www.theepochtimes.com/supreme-court-fails-to-immediately-act-on-trump-campaigns-request-to-expedite-pennsylvania-appeal_3630045.html (https://www.theepochtimes.com/supreme-court-fails-to-immediately-act-on-trump-campaigns-request-to-expedite-pennsylvania-appeal_3630045.html)
@Right_in_Virginia
Which is The Supremes way of saying "PLEASE doan make usins make no unpopular decisions!"
-
Another day, another stab in the back by a lawless SCOTUS.
@Cyber Liberty
I can only add "and GUTLESS!" to what you posted.
-
It should by now be evident to anyone paying any attention at all that the swamp has overcome the Constitution, we are no longer a nation of laws, and thus the union is desolved. Welcome to the newly minted Banana republic!
Merry Christmas!
What you stated is true. There is no way around it, no other way to look at the situation.
This is the Christmas Season and a Savior was born. Firmly hold on to your faith; that is what we have left. You have your morals and your principles and continue to stand by them.
Matthew 1:21
She will give birth to a Son, and you are to give Him the name Jesus, because He will save His people from their sins."
Merry Christmas!! May God Bless You and yours @Bigun and may he help you to move forward and stay strong through the trials and uncertainty of the future.
-
Supreme Court Fails to Immediately Act on Trump Campaign’s Request to Expedite Pennsylvania Appeal
Epoch Times, Dec 23, 2020
The Supreme Court on Wednesday docketed an appeal filed by President Donald Trump’s campaign that seeks to reverse cases by a state court but did not immediately act on the campaign’s request to expedite the case.
Instead, the top court’s docket shows a Jan. 22, 2021. deadline—two days after the presidential inauguration day—for when the state is required to respond to the request for appeal.
The campaign filed the suit on Monday challenging three Pennsylvania Supreme Court rulings that “illegally changed†the mail-in ballot laws “immediately before and after the 2020 presidential election,†the legal team said.
https://www.theepochtimes.com/supreme-court-fails-to-immediately-act-on-trump-campaigns-request-to-expedite-pennsylvania-appeal_3630045.html (https://www.theepochtimes.com/supreme-court-fails-to-immediately-act-on-trump-campaigns-request-to-expedite-pennsylvania-appeal_3630045.html)
I believe we are witnessing the most irrelevant entity in our Government. Why have a Supreme Court if it decides not to do what they were hired to do?
-
I believe we are witnessing the most irrelevant entity in our Government. Why have a Supreme Court if it decides not to do what they were hired to do?
There isn't.
It is like they are pawns of the Nth degree.
-
Ain't got much use out of the most of ALL government.
-
I believe we are witnessing the most irrelevant entity in our Government. Why have a Supreme Court if it decides not to do what they were hired to do?
@IsailedawayfromFR
AND.....,it is a lifetime job and they can't be removed.
-
@IsailedawayfromFR
AND.....,it is a lifetime job and they can't be removed.
They can be impeached, but that is about as likely as me running a two minute mile.
-
They can be impeached, but that is about as likely as me running a two minute mile.
C'mon up... We'll go find a griz... You'll get it done. :laugh:
-
C'mon up... We'll go find a griz... You'll get it done. :laugh:
I won't have to go that fast. I'll be running on dry, hard ground...unlike anything pursuing me.
-
I won't have to go that fast. I'll be running on dry, hard ground...unlike anything pursuing me.
LOL! Yeah. You can always throw poop in their eyes... And don't worry for the poop. It'll be there. :silly:
-
Pennsylvania says it found dead voters in Philadelphia!
...Two. And they both happen to be Trump votes, according to them. Other than that, no fraud. No sirree bob!
https://www.erienewsnow.com/story/43089105/man-accused-of-casting-dead-mothers-ballot (https://www.erienewsnow.com/story/43089105/man-accused-of-casting-dead-mothers-ballot)
-
LOL! Yeah. You can always throw poop in their eyes... And don't worry for the poop. It'll be there. :silly:
Well, If I have my chili the day before, they'll just think it's a new flavor of bear spray...
-
@Smokin Joe, you don't have to outrun the gris...you only have to outrun @roamer_1, and he says he's still stoved up.
(https://typeset-beta.imgix.net/elite-daily/2017/05/08082959/thinking-man-meme.jpg?w=748&h=448&fit=crop&crop=faces&auto=format&q=70)
-
@Smokin Joe, you don't have to outrun the gris...you only have to outrun @roamer_1, and he says he's still stoved up.
Yep. But that means I always got a stick... And mountain trails are narrow. It don't take much to whack you good across the knees as you go sailing past... Folks tend to forget that at least once. And that's all I need.
-
Well, If I have my chili the day before, they'll just think it's a new flavor of bear spray...
Put plenty of pepper on it.. They like that pepper... :laugh: :whistle:
-
In my judgment, the following is 100% spot on!
Excerpted from: https://www.westernjournal.com/twj-exclusive-bombshell-new-legal-memo-giving-trump-supporters-hope-christmas-eve/ (https://www.westernjournal.com/twj-exclusive-bombshell-new-legal-memo-giving-trump-supporters-hope-christmas-eve/)
Agreed. Thanks for posting.
-
Taking this one step beyond the subject matter,is there any legal way that a President Trump serving a second term can bring forward a bill to remove Roberts from the SC for dereliction of duty or incompetence?
That would be almost as sweet as seeing Trump serve a second term because it would also scare whiz out of the remaining "justices" who think they are all demi-gods that are untouchable.
-
Taking this one step beyond the subject matter,is there any legal way that a President Trump serving a second term can bring forward a bill to remove Roberts from the SC for dereliction of duty or incompetence?
That would be almost as sweet as seeing Trump serve a second term because it would also scare whiz out of the remaining "justices" who think they are all demi-gods that are untouchable.
Roberts can be Impeached, but even if the votes can be mustered in the House, the Rats and Rinos will close ranks in the Senate so we'd never get a conviction. They love their super-legislature on the bench too much to ever let it go.
-
Roberts can be Impeached, but even if the votes can be mustered in the House, the Rats and Rinos will close ranks in the Senate so we'd never get a conviction. They love their super-legislature on the bench too much to ever let it go.
@Cyber Liberty
I was afraid of something like that.
-
Taking this one step beyond the subject matter,is there any legal way that a President Trump serving a second term can bring forward a bill to remove Roberts from the SC for dereliction of duty or incompetence?
That would be almost as sweet as seeing Trump serve a second term because it would also scare whiz out of the remaining "justices" who think they are all demi-gods that are untouchable.
Trump can't, but the Congress (theoretically) can.
The House needs only a simple majority to impeach a Supreme Court justice or any federal judge. To convict and then remove the justice or judge, the Senate requires a two-thirds majority.
-
Donald J. Trump
@realDonaldTrump
“A group of Republican lawmakers in Pennsylvania say 200,000 more votes were counted in the 2020 Election than voters (100% went to Biden). State Representative Frank Ryan said they found troubling discrepancies after an analysis of Election Day data.†@FoxNews This is far....
...more votes than is needed by me to win Pennsylvania, not to mention hundreds of thousands of votes in other categories which increase my already big lead into a landslide. All other Swing States show likewise. WE NEED NEW & ENERGETIC REPUBLICAN LEADERSHIP. This can not stand..
....Can you imagine if the Republicans stole a Presidential Election from the Democrats - All hell would break out. Republican leadership only wants the path of least resistance. Our leaders (not me, of course!) are pathetic. They only know how to lose! P.S. I got MANY Senators..
....and Congressmen/Congresswomen Elected. I do believe they forgot!
8:59 AM · Dec 29, 2020·Twitter for iPhone
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1343919651336712199
-
Donald J. Trump
@realDonaldTrump
“A group of Republican lawmakers in Pennsylvania say 200,000 more votes were counted in the 2020 Election than voters (100% went to Biden). State Representative Frank Ryan said they found troubling discrepancies after an analysis of Election Day data.†@FoxNews This is far....
...more votes than is needed by me to win Pennsylvania, not to mention hundreds of thousands of votes in other categories which increase my already big lead into a landslide. All other Swing States show likewise. WE NEED NEW & ENERGETIC REPUBLICAN LEADERSHIP. This can not stand..
....Can you imagine if the Republicans stole a Presidential Election from the Democrats - All hell would break out. Republican leadership only wants the path of least resistance. Our leaders (not me, of course!) are pathetic. They only know how to lose! P.S. I got MANY Senators..
....and Congressmen/Congresswomen Elected. I do believe they forgot!
8:59 AM · Dec 29, 2020·Twitter for iPhone
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1343919651336712199
Yep, they forgot. Just like most of the TEA party elected forgot their promises made on the stump before they raised their hands to be sworn in.
Don't re-elect anyone!
-
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Eqkwy4CW4AAXfrD?format=jpg&name=medium)
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Eqkwy4DXIAA5hB8?format=jpg&name=medium)
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Eqkwy3_XcAEW-BW?format=jpg&name=medium)
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Eqkwy3_XMAIOj8D?format=jpg&name=medium)
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Eqkw9FeWMAA2Smu?format=jpg&name=medium)
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Eqkw9FnW8AE9K-D?format=jpg&name=medium)
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Eqkw9FzW8AMkAe5?format=jpg&name=900x900)
-
Do you have a link to that document in one image or file instead of seven separate files?
-
Do you have a link to that document in one image or file instead of seven separate files?
I've only a link to a four page tweet @Smokin Joe ... Mastriano didn't convert it to a PDF.
Here's the link, if it helps: https://twitter.com/SenMastriano/status/1344659659865677825
-
Dan Bongino
@dbongino
Pennsylvania Officials STILL Unsure How Many Voted In 2020? What?
Video: https://rumble.com/embed/v9paz3/?pub=4
3:18 PM · Dec 31, 2020·Twitter for iPhone
https://twitter.com/dbongino/status/1344739631309479939
-
Dan Bongino
@dbongino
Pennsylvania Officials STILL Unsure How Many Voted In 2020? What?
There is a large difference between the number of people who voted and the number of ballots counted. The two are nowhere near the same.
-
There is a large difference between the number of people who voted and the number of ballots counted. The two are nowhere near the same.
I believe it has been conclusively proven that somewhere North of 200,000 more ballots counted than actual voters.
-
There is a large difference between the number of people who voted and the number of ballots counted. The two are nowhere near the same.
This, alone, should be enough to set aside the entire PA election. When (votes in) <> (votes out) then the bare minimum requirement for credibility has not been met.
I do not believe even *this* problem will take the PA EVs away from Biden. Rs in PA were in some measure asleep at the switch when they allowed procedures that would let this slip through and still be certified. The PA State Legislature, and other R controlled state legislatures, will have to pass laws that enact much stricter requirements for transparency and credibility in counting votes as a condition for results to be certified in the future.
While I would still like to see a last-second flea-flicker bomb thrown from the back of the end zone and scoring the winning TD with 00:00 left on the clock, I don't expect to see that electoral outcome next week any more than I would expect to see that result in a football game. This one is over, and I don't know what to expect in GA.
The angle of attack that might work is within R-controlled state legislatures to enact voting, vote-counting, and certification laws that are transparent and trustworthy, and within state-level R parties to get honest judges and justices on their benches. Let this election be a cautionary tale.
-
This, alone, should be enough to set aside the entire PA election. When (votes in) <> (votes out) then the bare minimum requirement for credibility has not been met.
I do not believe even *this* problem will take the PA EVs away from Biden. Rs in PA were in some measure asleep at the switch when they allowed procedures that would let this slip through and still be certified. The PA State Legislature, and other R controlled state legislatures, will have to pass laws that enact much stricter requirements for transparency and credibility in counting votes as a condition for results to be certified in the future.
While I would still like to see a last-second flea-flicker bomb thrown from the back of the end zone and scoring the winning TD with 00:00 left on the clock, I don't expect to see that electoral outcome next week any more than I would expect to see that result in a football game. This one is over, and I don't know what to expect in GA.
The angle of attack that might work is within R-controlled state legislatures to enact voting, vote-counting, and certification laws that are transparent and trustworthy, and within state-level R parties to get honest judges and justices on their benches. Let this election be a cautionary tale.
I know what to expect in Georgia. MORE FRAUD. Just enough to tip the Senate, more carefully conducted, not as sloppy as the Presidential election, which was a slap in the face to anyone in the country who believes in the Constitution.
-
Mark R. Levin
@marklevinshow
1. What has happened to Toomey over the last few years is quite sad. Is he aware of what took place in his state, of the objections from the state legislature, of the changes to the election laws by the state supreme court and the executive there,
Burgess Everett
@burgessev
Toomey comes out swinging: “A fundamental, defining feature of a democratic republic is the right of the people to elect their own leaders. The effort by Senators Hawley, Cruz, and others to overturn the results of the 2020 presidential election ...directly undermines this rightâ€
2. and the federal Constitution's grant of authority to the legislature exclusively. TOOMEY SHOULD BE LEADING THE FIGHT in defense of his state. But instead, he damns those who are doing it for him.
5:03 PM · Jan 2, 2021·Twitter for Android
https://twitter.com/marklevinshow/status/1345490941415723008
-
Exclusive: Over 432,000 Votes Removed From Trump in Pennsylvania, Data Scientists Say
By Allen Zhong
January 4, 2021 Updated: January 4, 2021
Pennsylvania election data shows that over 432,000 votes were removed from President Donald Trump during the November election, data scientists say.
According to an analysis by the Data Integrity Group, obtained exclusively by The Epoch Times, votes for Trump—from both election day and mail-in ballots—were removed from the totals in at least 15 counties.
Time-series election data shows Trump’s votes decrementing in various counties at numerous time points instead of increasing as would be expected under normal circumstances.
The group said that election day vote removals happened during the vote tabulation process in at least 15 counties, including Lehigh County, Chester County, Allegheny County, Armstrong County, Westmoreland County, Northhampton County, Delaware County, Montgomery County, Lackawanna County, Dauphin County, Pike County, Carbon County, Washington County, Erie County, and Luzerne County.
Meanwhile, absentee vote removals happened in Allegheny County, Chester County, and Lehigh County.
At least 432,116 votes—213,707 election day votes and 218,409 absentee votes—were removed in total.
“There were vote movements across all candidates. However, we did not see the same type of negative decrements to any of the [other] candidates that we saw with President Trump’s tallies, and they happened repeatedly with no explanation,†Lynda McLaughlin, a member of the group, told The Epoch Times.
The Pennsylvania Secretary of State’s office didn’t respond to a request for comments from The Epoch Times.
more
https://www.theepochtimes.com/exclusive-over-432000-votes-removed-from-trump-in-pennsylvania-data-scientists-say_3642202.html (https://www.theepochtimes.com/exclusive-over-432000-votes-removed-from-trump-in-pennsylvania-data-scientists-say_3642202.html)
-
Kelly nanninga
@KellyWmis
BREAKING: A Printer in Michigan Printed Tens of Thousands of Excess Pennsylvania Ballots Which Were Shipped to New York and Fraudulently Filled Out Before Being Delivered to Pennsylvania https://thegatewaypundit.com/2021/01/breaking-printer-michigan-printed-tens-thousands-excess-pennsylvania-ballots-shipped-new-york-fraudulently-filled-delivered-pennsylvania/?utm_source=Twitter&utm_medium=PostTopSharingButtons&utm_campaign=websitesharingbuttons via
@gatewaypundit
2:18 PM · Jan 4, 2021·Twitter for iPad
https://twitter.com/KellyWmis/status/1346174068060528641
-
Those are pictures of Utah ballots.
-
Those are pictures of Utah ballots.
File photo?
-
File photo?
Apparently. But I've removed it. Thanks @Hoodat
-
Exclusive: Over 432,000 Votes Removed From Trump in Pennsylvania, Data Scientists Say
By Allen Zhong
January 4, 2021 Updated: January 4, 2021
Pennsylvania election data shows that over 432,000 votes were removed from President Donald Trump during the November election, data scientists say.
According to an analysis by the Data Integrity Group, obtained exclusively by The Epoch Times, votes for Trump—from both election day and mail-in ballots—were removed from the totals in at least 15 counties.
The Pennsylvania Secretary of State’s office didn’t respond to a request for comments from The Epoch Times.
@mystery-ak
Gee,THERE's a shock!
-
(Asking to delay certification .... )
Christina Bobb
@christina_bobb
PA has spoken. The legislators are overruling the Secretary of State.
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/ErA4mZ_XYAMvf5O?format=jpg&name=large)(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/ErA4moVXcAEEWON?format=jpg&name=large)
9:03 PM · Jan 5, 2021·Twitter for iPhone
https://twitter.com/christina_bobb/status/1346638534917107712
-
(Asking to delay certification .... )
Christina Bobb
@christina_bobb
PA has spoken. The legislators are overruling the Secretary of State.
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/ErA4mZ_XYAMvf5O?format=jpg&name=large)(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/ErA4moVXcAEEWON?format=jpg&name=large)
9:03 PM · Jan 5, 2021·Twitter for iPhone
https://twitter.com/christina_bobb/status/1346638534917107712
pointing-up
Donald J. Trump
@realDonaldTrump
BIG NEWS IN PENNSYLVANIA!
9:59 PM · Jan 5, 2021·Twitter for iPhone
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1346652589673345024
-
(Asking to delay certification .... )
Christina Bobb
@christina_bobb
PA has spoken. The legislators are overruling the Secretary of State.
9:03 PM · Jan 5, 2021·Twitter for iPhone
https://twitter.com/christina_bobb/status/1346638534917107712
Meh. Not gonna happen. 9999hair out0000
-
Pennsylvania to Remove Dead Voters from Voter Rolls Following Lawsuit
JOHN BINDER | 8 Apr 2021
Pennsylvania election officials have agreed to remove thousands of dead Americans from its state voter rolls following a lawsuit by the Public Interest Legal Foundation (PILF).
In November 2020, PILF attorneys filed suit against Pennsylvania election officials, alleging at least 21,000 dead Americans were on the state’s voter rolls less than a month before the 2020 presidential election.
The lawsuit claimed more than 9,200 of the dead Americans on the voter rolls had been dead for at least five years, nearly 2,000 had been dead for at least a decade, and nearly 200 had been dead for at least 20 years.
This week, PILF attorneys reached a settlement with Pennsylvania’s Acting Secretary Veronica Degraffenreid that requires state election officials to compare death data sets from the Electronic Registration Information Center to the full voter registration database before the 2021 election. . . .
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2021/04/08/pennsylvania-remove-dead-voters-voter-rolls/
It is sad that it takes a lawsuit to get a state to remove dead voters from its voter rolls.
-
Pennsylvania to Remove Dead Voters from Voter Rolls Following Lawsuit
JOHN BINDER | 8 Apr 2021
Pennsylvania election officials have agreed to remove thousands of dead Americans from its state voter rolls following a lawsuit by the Public Interest Legal Foundation (PILF).
In November 2020, PILF attorneys filed suit against Pennsylvania election officials, alleging at least 21,000 dead Americans were on the state’s voter rolls less than a month before the 2020 presidential election.
The lawsuit claimed more than 9,200 of the dead Americans on the voter rolls had been dead for at least five years, nearly 2,000 had been dead for at least a decade, and nearly 200 had been dead for at least 20 years.
This week, PILF attorneys reached a settlement with Pennsylvania’s Acting Secretary Veronica Degraffenreid that requires state election officials to compare death data sets from the Electronic Registration Information Center to the full voter registration database before the 2021 election. . . .
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2021/04/08/pennsylvania-remove-dead-voters-voter-rolls/
It is sad that it takes a lawsuit to get a state to remove dead voters from its voter rolls.
@Hoodat
This is PA. They will just replace them with the newly dead before the next election. Dead voters are their most reliable voters.
-
So, how many of the thousands of dead voters voted last November? The article doesn't say.
-
So, how many of the thousands of dead voters voted last November? The article doesn't say.
And how many times did each of those dead voters vote?
-
And how many times did each of those dead voters vote?
The article enlightens neither question, and that's a shame because it would have added a lot to the story...
-
Here are two dead people who voted in Pennsylvania:
(http://i1.cmail20.com/ei/r/01/74E/222/095748/csfinal/Granahan-9900000000079e3c.jpg)
(http://i2.cmail20.com/ei/r/01/74E/222/095748/csfinal/Presto-990a280a28028a3c.jpg)
The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania fought in court to keep them registered for the next election.
-
@Hoodat
This is PA. They will just replace them with the newly dead before the next election. Dead voters are their most reliable voters.
Meh. Why bother, when they can have thousands of voters more than registered anyway?
-
The article enlightens neither question, and that's a shame because it would have added a lot to the story...
@Hoodat
I think it wouldn't matter. SCOTUS doesn't care.
-
Pennsylvania poised to begin Arizona-style election audit with subpoena power
Pennsylvania poised to begin Arizona-style election audit with subpoena power
by Daniel Chaitin, Deputy News Editor |
| June 18, 2021 09:07 PM
| Updated Jun 18, 2021, 10:11 PM
Pennsylvania appears to be on the precipice of initiating an Arizona-style audit of the 2020 election.
State Sen. David Argall, who heads a committee that oversees elections, told local news outlets he favors a forensic audit of the contest that state and federal officials insist was secure.
The Republican, under pressure by former President Donald Trump to take action, told the Capital-Star the audit is now a “very real possibility." The report said he is considering subpoenas for ballot information and which jurisdictions to send them.
“There are a lot of things under consideration right now, and I told them to check back in a week or two, and we hope to have some more detail,” he told the outlet after meeting with audit-supporting activists on Thursday.
more
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/pennsylvania-arizona-style-election-audit-subpoena-power
-
Pennsylvania poised to begin Arizona-style election audit with subpoena power
Pennsylvania poised to begin Arizona-style election audit with subpoena power
by Daniel Chaitin, Deputy News Editor |
| June 18, 2021 09:07 PM
| Updated Jun 18, 2021, 10:11 PM
Pennsylvania appears to be on the precipice of initiating an Arizona-style audit of the 2020 election.
State Sen. David Argall, who heads a committee that oversees elections, told local news outlets he favors a forensic audit of the contest that state and federal officials insist was secure.
The Republican, under pressure by former President Donald Trump to take action, told the Capital-Star the audit is now a “very real possibility." The report said he is considering subpoenas for ballot information and which jurisdictions to send them.
“There are a lot of things under consideration right now, and I told them to check back in a week or two, and we hope to have some more detail,” he told the outlet after meeting with audit-supporting activists on Thursday.
more
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/pennsylvania-arizona-style-election-audit-subpoena-power
Time For A Reckoning In Pennsylvania (https://andmagazine.com/talk/2021/06/23/time-for-a-reckoning-in-pennsylvania/)
by Charles "Sam" Faddis June 23, 2021
Essential Truths
There is a lot of disinformation floating around about Pennsylvania, audits, and the fight for election integrity in the Keystone State. Almost every day I read an article suggesting that Pennsylvania is about to follow Arizona down the road of really digging into what happened in the November 2020 elections. That is not anywhere close to true. Here is the ground truth from the Keystone State.
1. Pennsylvania moved to no excuse mail-in voting in 2020 pursuant to a vote of the legislature. That legislature was then and is now controlled by the Republican Party. Subsequent interpretations of the new law by the Pennsylvania Supreme Court and Secretary of State made the new law, Act 77, worse in the sense of providing even more opportunities for electoral fraud, but the move to mail-in voting was made by Republican lawmakers.
2. The Pennsylvania GOP agreed to move to mail-in voting as part of a deal brokered with the Democratic Party in Pennsylvania. In exchange for GOP support for mail-in voting, the Democrats agreed to support ending straight-party voting, which until then had been possible in Pennsylvania elections. The Pennsylvania GOP wanted to end this practice because party leadership had concluded President Trump would be a drag on down-ballot GOP candidates. The powers that be in Harrisburg wanted to cut away the sitting President of the United States.
3. There is currently no serious effort underway in Harrisburg to repeal Act 77 and return the Commonwealth to in-person voting
-- excerpt, rest at link above --
And THAT is truly sad.
Seeking on the scene comments from @massadvj and others in Pennsylvania.
-
What I am hearing is that all eyes in Pennsylvania are on Arizona. The Pennsylvania GOP is pretty much waiting to see what happens there before pulling the trigger on an audit here. There are quite a few GOP legislators pushing for an audit, but there will not be a consensus on it until the Maricopa results are in. If the Maricopa County audit reveals some funny business I think there will be some action here. Otherwise no.
-
What I am hearing is that all eyes in Pennsylvania are on Arizona. The Pennsylvania GOP is pretty much waiting to see what happens there before pulling the trigger on an audit here. There are quite a few GOP legislators pushing for an audit, but there will not be a consensus on it until the Maricopa results are in. If the Maricopa County audit reveals some funny business I think there will be some action here. Otherwise no.
Yup. This one down here is for all the marbles. Blow it, and we all lose.
-
Yup. This one down here is for all the marbles. Blow it, and we all lose.
Praying for that miracle! Lord God Jesus Christ, please stop the evil that has a stranglehold on our Republic from prevailing.
-
PA State Sen. Announces Forensic Election Audit
The Post & Email 7/7/2021
https://www.thepostemail.com/2021/07/07/pa-state-sen-announces-forensic-election-audit/ (https://www.thepostemail.com/2021/07/07/pa-state-sen-announces-forensic-election-audit/)
Chairman of the Pennsylvania Senate Intergovernmental Operations Committee Doug Mastriano (R) announced on Wednesday he has launched a forensic audit of the November 3, 2020 election and 2021 primary which will involve multiple counties in the Commonwealth.
According to 45th President of the United States Donald J. Trump in a rally speech on Friday night, various state legislators are taking action about what Trump claims was widespread fraud, resulting in a “rigged” election which cost him a second term.
Mastriano’s declaration follows a forensic election audit taking place in Arizona’s largest county, Maricopa, which appears to have provided a model for legislators from other states, including Pennsylvania, to explore launching their own.
According to Mastriano’s press release, the endeavor “is necessary as millions of Pennsylvanians have serious doubts about the accuracy of the 2020 General Election. A January poll from Muhlenberg University showed that 40% of Pennsylvania voters are not confident that the results of the 2020 Election accurately reflected how Pennsylvanians voted.…”
-
Does this have any legal standing that might lead to consequences?
-
Divided Pennsylvania House gives approval for audit of 2020 election
Pittsburg Post Gazette, Nov 20, 2020
<snip>
Democrats attacked the proposal, calling it unconstitutional, damaging to democracy and unnecessary.
@Right_in_Virginia
Irrelevant,since we are NOT a democracy.
We are a REPUBLIC.
-
PA Department of State Issues Directive after Forensic Election Audit Opened
The Post & Email 7/11/2021
An announcement on Wednesday of a forensic election audit by Pennsylvania State Sen. Doug Mastriano was followed by a directive from Commonwealth Department of State Acting Secretary Veronica Degraffenreid to refuse to provide election equipment from “third parties.”
In a press release and video statement, Mastriano, who chairs the state senate Intergovernmental Operations Committee, asserted that irregularities occurring in the November 3, 2020 general election and 2021 primaries for municipal elections led him to open the audit with the purpose of restoring Pennsylvanians’ faith in the election process.
“Today, as Chair of the Intergovernmental Operations Committee, I issued letters to several counties requesting information and materials needed to conduct a forensic investigation of the 2020 General Election and the 2021 Primary,” Mastriano wrote in his press release. “We have asked these counties to respond by July 31st with a plan to comply. The counties represent different geographical regions of Pennsylvania and differing political makeups. Some are Republican while others are Democrat, which means that this will be a balanced investigation.”
“The case for a forensic investigation of the 2020 general election is evident to any unbiased observer,” the announcement continued. “This was the first election in Pennsylvania with ‘mass’ mail-in voting. In 2020, there were 2.7 million ballots cast by mail and absentee compared to about 263,000 absentee ballots cast in 2016. Many of these ballots were counted at off-site locations with little outside observation or oversight. Furthermore, mail ballots without signature verification were permitted to be counted across the Commonwealth.”
Pennsylvania’s legislature has a majority of Republicans in both chambers, while its governor, Tom Wolf, is a Democrat. “Governor Wolf and the Secretary of State refused to conduct any type of thorough investigation despite the concerns of millions of our citizens in the aftermath of the election and hundreds of affidavits alleging first-hand fraud, irregularities, and illegal behavior witnessed at polling places,” Mastriano wrote on page 2 of his announcement. “The closest thing to an investigation we got was a small so called ‘risk-limiting’ audit which consisted of a sample of only 45,000 randomly selected ballots from the November Election. Not nearly the type of investigation that was needed to determine any fraud, misconduct, or technical anomalies. This audit was conducted by the Department of State and did not include public input for outside observers.”
More: https://www.thepostemail.com/2021/07/11/pa-department-of-state-issues-directive-after-forensic-election-audit-opened/ (https://www.thepostemail.com/2021/07/11/pa-department-of-state-issues-directive-after-forensic-election-audit-opened/)
-
It appears the Rats have been watching AZ SOS Hobbs as closely as the PA Republicans watched Sonny Borrelli. These are the defensive rules Hobbs used, only they've learned from her many mistakes.
-
https://twitter.com/Grahmptri/status/1414620162414817285
-
https://twitter.com/SenMastriano/status/1414612974690521088
-
Initiator of PA Forensic Election Audit Confronts Biden
The Post & Email 7/12/2021
https://www.thepostemail.com/2021/07/12/initiator-of-pa-forensic-election-audit-confronts-biden/ (https://www.thepostemail.com/2021/07/12/initiator-of-pa-forensic-election-audit-confronts-biden/)
On Monday Pennsylvania state senator Doug Mastriano (R), who launched a forensic investigation of the November 3, 20920 election last week, tweeted a letter in which he confronted White House occupant Joe Biden with Pennsylvanians’ expressed uncertainty “about the accuracy of the 2020 General Election” which declared Biden the winner over then-incumbent President Donald J. Trump.
Mastriano’s letter responded to Biden’s anticipated visit on Tuesday to Philadelphia, one of the cities the forensic probe will encompass, during which Biden will reportedly speak on “actions to protect the sacred, constitutional right to vote.”
In his one-page missive, Mastriano provided his reasons for conducting the audit and requested a meeting with Biden “to come together…to restore trust in our system.” “The people of our Commonwealth should have confidence that their vote counts,” Mastriano wrote. “It takes accountability and transparency to ensure that our elections are free and fair.”
As he wrote in a press release released on Wednesday, Mastriano told Biden, “Millions of Pennsylvanians have serious doubts about the accuracy of the 2020 General Election. A January poll from Muhlenberg University showed that 40% of Pennsylvania voters are not confident that the results of the 2020 Election accurately reflected how Pennsylvanians voted.”
-
(https://i.postimg.cc/FRvBK5Qj/E6-Le2-LKVk-AYCJgd.jpg)
-
Some election news from today .....nothing to see here. :smokin:
https://mobile.twitter.com/catturd2/status/1450581315556986883
-
Some election news from today .....nothing to see here. :smokin:
https://mobile.twitter.com/catturd2/status/1450581315556986883
@Right_in_Virginia
Surprising absolutely no one. Stuffing ballot boxes is a centuries old PA tradition.
-
@Right_in_Virginia
Surprising absolutely no one. Stuffing ballot boxes is a centuries old PA tradition.
It still pisses me off @sneakypete ------where the hell is the GOP State Legislature????
-
It still pisses me off @sneakypete ------where the hell is the GOP State Legislature????
Exactly.
-
It still pisses me off @sneakypete ------where the hell is the GOP State Legislature????
@Right Reason
In their usual place,the minority.
And as usual,the left has no interest in bipartisanship when they hold a solid majority.
Compromise is only for Republicans.
-
Pa. County Whistleblower: Data Regarding Thousands of Return Ballots Erased
Luca Cacciatore | Wednesday, 17 November 2021 | 10:52 PM
A whistleblower is offering up information said to be related to data suppression, involving "missing ballots" in Delaware County, Pennsylvania, from the 2020 election.
The information comes after a right-to-know request was filed in May, sources familiar with the lawsuit said. The sources spoke to Newsmax on the condition of anonymity.
Delaware County was the last county in the state to fully report its ballots for the 2020 election, and several races were in the scope of being flipped by a few thousand votes.
The lawsuit suggests an election machine shredded thousands of absentee and mail-in ballots, with the data corroborating it deliberately erased in the lead up to the right-to-know filing.
Several videos were released as part of the effort to corroborate the claims. . . .
https://www.newsmax.com/politics/electionfraud-2020-whistleblower/2021/11/17/id/1045154/
-
https://twitter.com/ProfMJCleveland/status/1461152992443486213
-
https://twitter.com/ProfMJCleveland/status/1461153986506117125
-
https://twitter.com/ProfMJCleveland/status/1461154558458146817
-
Whistleblower Videos Capture Pennsylvania Election Officials Destroying Evidence
A complaint alleges Pennslyvania election officials were tearing tapes 'into pieces and placing ... them into the trash stating they will have a campfire to burn the data.'
https://thefederalist.com/2021/11/19/whistleblower-videos-capture-pennsylvania-election-officials-destroying-evidence/
-
New Videos Capture Pennsylvania Officials Hiding Evidence Of Alleged Election Fraud
MARGOT CLEVELAND | DECEMBER 21, 2021
New whistleblower videos capture Delaware County, Pennsylvania officials plotting to recreate missing election data from the November 2020 contest, with one official later bragging that the local Democrat district attorney “owes him.” These recordings represent the latest evidence of the alleged fraud officials in the Pennsylvania county undertook to hide widespread violations of the state’s election laws, according to a source familiar with the recordings.
Whistleblower Regina Miller, who worked as a contract employee for Delaware County, secretly recorded the behind-the-scenes videos of election officials after witnessing concerning conduct, according to sources with knowledge of a fraud lawsuit filed last month against county election officials, based in part on the recordings. That lawsuit alleged county election officials destroyed election data in response to a May 21, 2021 Right to Know Request filed with Delaware County that requested the final certified return sheets from the Nov. 3, 2020 general election for all Delaware County precincts, as well as the tapes from the voting machines.
While earlier videos captured Delaware County officials destroying election material or blocking out “derogatory” information in the copies made in response to the Right to Know Request, the latest video captures two election officials discussing putting in “blank” V-drives, which are the thumb drives that record the results from election machines, to recreate the election results reported by the county. . . .
https://thefederalist.com/2021/12/21/new-videos-capture-delaware-county-officials-hiding-evidence-of-alleged-election-fraud/
-
Pennsylvania Court Issues Defeat to Governor and AG with Stunning Decision on Dominion Voting Machines
Kyle Becker | December 23, 2021
State officials in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania who sought to block transparency and accountability over the 2020 election were handed a defeat on Thursday, according to the non-profit legal foundation The Amistad Project.
“The Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania has ruled in favor of The Amistad Project and Fulton County, Pennsylvania, allowing the county to send its Dominion voting machines to the State Senate for inspection on January 10,” the group stated in a press release.
“The court recognized that it was improper to demand that the county – which owns the machines, and has the responsibility of running the election along with the legislature – can’t determine whether the machines worked properly,” said Phill Kline, director of The Amistad Project. “As the judge noted, there’s no justification for preventing the county from looking at their own machines.”
Pennsylvania’s attorney general and secretary of state had sued to prevent the inspection, the press release notes. . . .
https://beckernews.com/pennsylvania-court-issues-defeat-to-governor-and-ag-with-stunning-decision-on-dominion-voting-machines-43475/
-
Well,if the legal system in Pa doesn't do something about this now,they might as well go ahead and admit that Anarchy rules in PA.
-
Video Shows Pennsylvania Official Admitting Election Laws Were Broken In 2020
MARGOT CLEVELAND | JANUARY 17, 2022
“So, we’re going to actually follow the law fully this time,” Delaware County, Pennsylvania’s Christina Perrone told fellow election-related workers during a Zoom meeting after the November 2020 election. This video—the latest obtained by The Federalist—provides yet another example of widespread violations of election law during the last presidential election.
Regina Miller, a contract worker for the large Pennsylvania county, filmed the video of the April 7, 2021 Zoom meeting, which involved voting officials discussing plans for the upcoming elections, according to sources familiar with the recording. The video began with Perrone, who, according to a lawsuit filed against her, other Delaware County officials, and the county, served as a project manager for the county, saying they would “talk about that off-line”—with the “that” not specified.
The remainder of the clip, however, gave some clues, with Perrone saying she had a brief conversation with “Jim,” “and this time it’s much different than last time because we’re going to have them sign oaths. There’re going to be W4s and we need them to sign something allowing somebody else to pick up. So, we’re going to actually follow the law fully this time,” Perrone ended with a laugh. . . .
(http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P7lxtDFNcag&t=27s)
https://thefederalist.com/2022/01/17/video-shows-pennsylvania-official-admitting-election-laws-were-broken-in-2020/
-
Jack Posobiec 🇺🇸
@JackPosobiec
·
1m
BREAKING: Pennsylvania court finds universal mail-in voting Act 77 unconstitutional
https://gettr.com/post/pr3dw14d54
@Cyber Liberty @Right_in_Virginia
-
https://gettr.com/post/pr3dw14d54
@Bigun
If that was the PA Supreme Court,THAT one is going to cause some nightmares!
-
https://gettr.com/post/pr3dw14d54
@Cyber Liberty @Right_in_Virginia
Good news @Bigun
(Although I'm stilll PO'd with Alito for punting this before the election)
-
Remember ..... Trump was leading by 697,0000+ votes when PA went dark on Nov 3.
When the lights came back on, Biden was shown as taking the lead.
-
Remember ..... Trump was leading by 697,0000+ votes when PA went dark on Nov 3.
When the lights came back on, Biden was shown as taking the lead.
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EmPQ7joVgAMccpQ.jpg)
-
Bill Mitchell
@mitchellvii
From GA to WI to PA, the authorities are admitting now that massive fraud was committed in 2020 and yet no one has been indicted. Meanwhile Jan 6th trespassers rot in solitary confinement, tortured and denied due process.
Why is the GOP so terrified to ever indict a Democrat? They investigate FOREVER yet never indict. The Durham investigation is STILL dragging on years later with nothing but some underlings to show for it.
-
Bill Mitchell
@mitchellvii
Why is the GOP so terrified to ever indict a Democrat?
Because ALL of the leadership is so corrupt they are afraid the Dims will indict them if they do.
There CAN be no other rational explanation.
Or a better reason to vote the bastards out of office.
-
Rasmussen Reports
@Rasmussen_Poll
58% say cheating was likely in the 2020 elections
69% against Zuckerbucks type private election spending
76% say Photo ID is reasonable to prevent cheating
90% say it is important to prevent cheating
ALL of these results are exclusively from INDEPENDENTS
https://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/general_politics/december_2021/voters_against_zuckerbucks_influencing_elections
Posted on 9:30 AM · Jan 31st, 2022
-
Last Week’s Court Ruling in Pennsylvania Means 40% of 2020 Ballots Unconstitutional — Without These Ballots President Trump Crushed Biden by a 2 to 1 Ratio in the State!
Gateway Pundit 1/30/2022
Attorney Wally Zimolong in Pennsylvania won a historic case last week in the Commonwealth Court. The justices agreed that the state’s constitution does not provide for ‘no excuse’ mail-in balloting.
Steve Bannon’s War Room invited attorney Wally Zimolong on to discuss the use of absentee ballots in the state of Pennsylvania.
He filed a suit in the state in which the court last week agreed that the law of Pennsylvania does not allow “no excuse” mail-in balloting. The court ruling said the attempt to allow such mail-in balloting was invalid from the start, meaning before the 2020 election.
Attorney Wally Zimolong won the case last week where the Appeals court in Pennsylvania ruled that ‘no excuse’ mail-in absentee ballots were not provided for in Pennsylvania’s constitution.
More: https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/01/huge-exclusive-accounting-court-confirmed-illegitimate-votes-pennsylvania-2020-election-president-trump-beat-joe-biden-2-1-ratio-trump-crushed-biden-pennsylvania/ (https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/01/huge-exclusive-accounting-court-confirmed-illegitimate-votes-pennsylvania-2020-election-president-trump-beat-joe-biden-2-1-ratio-trump-crushed-biden-pennsylvania/)
-
Explosive Pennsylvania Testimony Explains How Leftist Money Infiltrated Election Offices In 2020
This evidence should be enough for the Pennsylvania legislature to recognize there is a real problem when private money and private actors collaborate with election officials.
By: Margot Cleveland
April 08, 2022 The Democrat governor’s office in Pennsylvania colluded with left-wing activists to secure millions of dollars in private money to run get-out-the-vote efforts in blue counties in the swing state in 2020, new, explosive testimony revealed. The Pennsylvania legislature heard this testimony, backed up by email evidence, on Tuesday during the first public hearing on two new bills seeking to block private grants.
Tuesday’s public hearing began with statements by the respective primary sponsors of the bills that seek to ban dark money from elections, with Sen. Lisa Baker speaking in support of Senate Bill 982 and Rep. Eric Nelson encouraging passage of House Bill 2044. Pennsylvania investigative journalist Todd Shepherd then testified at length on the results of his extensive probe into the insertion of private funds into the 2020 election.
With a series of PowerPoint slides, Shepherd revealed to lawmakers that beginning in July 2020, consultants working for leftist organizations coordinated with local election officials and Democrat Gov.Tom Wolf’s office to lobby five blue counties to apply for these private grants. While the grants originated with the nominally non-partisan Center for Tech and Civic Life—an organization that Mark Zuckerberg and Priscilla Chan’s private foundation later infused with some $350 million in cash—emails reveal that a main consultant involved in targeting select counties, Marc Solomon, worked for the Center for Secure and Modern Elections, or the CSME. ...
The Federalist (https://thefederalist.com/2022/04/08/explosive-pennsylvania-testimony-explains-how-leftist-money-infiltrated-election-offices-in-2020/)
-
Watch the trailer then see the movie!
https://rumble.com/v124geo-2000-mules-extended-trailer.html
-
Watch the trailer then see the movie!
https://rumble.com/v124geo-2000-mules-extended-trailer.html
I'm supposed to get this DVD in a week or so. My County Chairman is getting some advance copies so we can screen it in my little town.
-
Pennsylvania Supreme Court upholds state's no-excuses mail-in ballot law in blow to GOP (https://justthenews.com/politics-policy/elections/pennsylvania-supreme-court-upholds-states-no-excuses-mail-ballot-law-blow?utm_source=breaking&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=newsletter)
Democrat justices concluded nothing in state constitution prohibits widespread use of absentee ballots, reversing lower court.
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court ruled Tuesday the 2019 law expanding the state's mail-in voting was constitutional, overruling Republicans who argued no-excuse absentee voting should be outlawed.
The Democrat-led court ruled 5-2 to uphold law known as Act 77 -- with the court's two Republicans voting against -- all but ensuring wide-spread mail-in voting will be available in Pennsylvania for the mid-term elections that will decide control of Congress. Pennsylvania features a contest for the open Senate seat.
"Nothing in the recorded procedures of the constitutional convention resulting in the 1838 Constitution suggests the intent to intermingle qualifications of voters with the method of voting," the court concluded.
"Nothing in Article VII prohibits the legislature from eliminating the ability of qualified voters to cast their votes by mail, just as nothing in the Constitution required it to do so...
Excerpt: Rest at headline link.
I think this is complete BS but I'm no expert on the Pennsylvania constitution either and will defer to @mountaineer on this one.
-
The Courts are the enemy. That's been true my entire adult life, starting in 1972.
-
When the Supreme Court decides a case on Party lines, it isn't deciding it based on any Law but the Law of the Jungle.
-
I'm afraid I'm no expert on the PA constitution, @Bigun - just a former resident.
-
I'm afraid I'm no expert on the PA constitution, @Bigun - just a former resident.
And a recovering lawyer IIRC. @mountaineer
-
Pennsylvania Supreme Court upholds state's no-excuses mail-in ballot law in blow to GOP (https://justthenews.com/politics-policy/elections/pennsylvania-supreme-court-upholds-states-no-excuses-mail-ballot-law-blow?utm_source=breaking&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=newsletter)
Democrat justices concluded nothing in state constitution prohibits widespread use of absentee ballots, reversing lower court.
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court ruled Tuesday the 2019 law expanding the state's mail-in voting was constitutional, overruling Republicans who argued no-excuse absentee voting should be outlawed.
@Bigun
Just out of curiosity,WHO made this seem like it is suddenly a good idea,after all the decades of not allowing it.
BTW,just because something isn't explicitly legal doesn't mean it is a good idea. If it had been a good idea,our Founding Fathers,who NO sane person can suggest were not a HELL of a lot smarter AND more honest that the creatures we now have in government,would have agreed to this back in the 1776,when it was a HELL of a lot harder for voters to get to the polls than it is today.
-
@Bigun
Just out of curiosity,WHO made this seem like it is suddenly a good idea,after all the decades of not allowing it.
BTW,just because something isn't explicitly legal doesn't mean it is a good idea. If it had been a good idea,our Founding Fathers,who NO sane person can suggest were not a HELL of a lot smarter AND more honest that the creatures we now have in government,would have agreed to this back in the 1776,when it was a HELL of a lot harder for voters to get to the polls than it is today.
Can't cheat if you can't create phantom votes! @sneakypete
-
So, now we know which way PA will go in the upcoming elections.
-
So, now we know which way PA will go in the upcoming elections.
Elections in the two major cities in PA - both Democrat, of course - have always been corrupt.
-
@Bigun
Just out of curiosity,WHO made this seem like it is suddenly a good idea,after all the decades of not allowing it.
BTW,just because something isn't explicitly legal doesn't mean it is a good idea. If it had been a good idea,our Founding Fathers,who NO sane person can suggest were not a HELL of a lot smarter AND more honest that the creatures we now have in government,would have agreed to this back in the 1776,when it was a HELL of a lot harder for voters to get to the polls than it is today.
In line with the US Constitution, if those powers were not expressly delegated to the Federal Government, it did not have them (they were reserved to the States and the People).
If it didn't say it could, then it couldn't. That was clarified in The Bill of Rights, and later muddled by the courts as often as clarified further.
Perhaps the problem arises from the concept that people could show up in person and vote more cheaply than posting a vote in the mail of the day, so mail in voting was never even considered, any more than voting online.
I would not think that that would automatically give the State the authority to suck up that bit of power. I find the court's argument weak.
-
In line with the US Constitution, if those powers were not expressly delegated to the Federal Government, it did not have them (they were reserved to the States and the People).
If it didn't say it could, then it couldn't. That was clarified in The Bill of Rights, and later muddled by the courts as often as clarified further.
Perhaps the problem arises from the concept that people could show up in person and vote more cheaply than posting a vote in the mail of the day, so mail in voting was never even considered, any more than voting online.
I would not think that that would automatically give the State the authority to suck up that bit of power. I find the court's argument weak.
The Constitution very plainly says that members of congress shall be selected by methods created by the legislatures of the individual states. Doesn't say a damned word about judges, courts, governors, or secretaries of state.
-
The Constitution very plainly says that members of congress shall be selected by methods created by the legislatures of the individual states. Doesn't say a damned word about judges, courts, governors, or secretaries of state.
Precisely. Anything else is Unconstitutional and should be void--or avoided.