He appears to be saying that it violated the Constitution when it was originally enacted by Georgia - because at that time the Constitution included Roe v. Wade
Silly judge. Roe was never part of the Constitution.
His ruling is posted here: https://www.gpb.org/news/2022/11/15/judge-overturns-georgias-ban-on-abortion-after-6-weeks
Georgia’s Void Ab Initio Doctrine: Explained and Applied
However, before reaching the merits of Plaintiffs’ constitutional claims as they exist today, the Court must first consider whether there is even a law “on the books” for it to assess.7 In Georgia, it is fundamental that “[l]egislative acts in violation of this Constitution or the Constitution of the United States are void, and the judiciary shall so declare them.” Ga. Const., Art. I, § II, ¶ V; see also Beall v. Beall, 8 Ga. 210, 219–20 (1850). But there is a timing element to this analysis: “The time with reference to which the constitutionality of an act of the general assembly is to be determined is the date of its passage, and, if it is unconstitutional, then it is forever void.” Jones v. McCaskill, 112 Ga. 453, 37 S.E. 724, 725 (1900) (emphasis added)
The wording throughout the decision overflows with bias. Nothing fair or impartial contained in it anywhere.