General Category > Grassroots Activism and Living

Women LEARN The Hard Way That They Need MAN

(1/2) > >>

240B:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-3i-hFKGexM&list=WL&index=3&t=3029s

Long video, but worth it when you have the time. You can increase the speed and just skip through it to get the idea.
Not a fan of Bear Grylls. He has been caught several time faking 'survival' videos. But he is not really in this one.
They put all men on one island and all women on another island with no supplies, for them to survive.

roamer_1:
This is actually interesting... Must be city women.

Because in the wild, given a knowledge of the landscape, Women would tend to have the advantage.

Men are made to see things that move (hunter)... Women see things that don't move (forage).
Men require vastly more energy to operate. Men require specialized tools to operate (hunt), which must be created. Men are far more likely to sustain damage.

Women have natural fat reserves and can operate at minimized expense for a longer time.
Foraging requires less expenditure than hunting.

Of the hilljilly chicks I personally know, I would expect any of them to get along alright if left alone in the woods - She wouldn't be having a grand time without a man, and over time would wear away hard, as the hunting is what provides protein... And women generally operate at a disadvantage in hunting/trapping/fishing.

But depending upon the season, that ought to take quite a while.

The outliers in that would be chance - Protection and shelter building, where a man's natural attributes hold a vast advantage... and firewood. Womenfolk get tore up getting wood bucked up, where a man can take that in stride. Likewise any number of ways a man can improve his lot - His larger frame, providing he can feed it, offers greater traveling ability, greater packing strength, and greater self-protection.

The women though, they balance that with less requirement, less energy output, greater foraging advantage, greater ability at fiddley tasks (like sewing, basket weaving, long term cooking), and vast advantage in health and medicine.

In my experience (and I have done this sort of thing in the real world) a man can survive better if he can get to meat. A woman can survive better on forage. And neither will survive particularly as well as they would together. Together they can prosper.

Free Vulcan:

--- Quote from: roamer_1 on April 01, 2025, 02:36:51 pm ---This is actually interesting... Must be city women.

--- End quote ---

Have to be. Even the most helpless townie women around here have at least a common sense, pitch-in attitude to get it done if need be even if they don't have alot of skills.

These women are less than useless.

Timber Rattler:
 :bkmk:

berdie:
Personally, I think all women should be required to live solo in the country for at least a year. It's not that it can't be done...but it will sure make you appreciate a guy.  :rolling: When I was married, my dearly departed just did things. Things I took for granted.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page