The Briefing Room
General Category => Politics/Government => Topic started by: Machiavelli on February 01, 2019, 08:40:49 pm
-
Pam Key
Breitbart
February 1, 2019
Friday on Yahoo’s “Skullduggery†podcast, conservative author Ann Coulter said President Donald Trump won for one reason: People want the federal government to build a wall on the U.S.-Mexico border.
Coulter said, “We put this lunatic in the White House for one reason, we wanted a wall.â€
She added, “There is no on-again, off-again relationship with Trump. I will defend him on the things he deserves defending on and I will attack him when he doesn’t keep his promises.
More (https://www.breitbart.com/clips/2019/02/01/ann-coulter-we-put-lunatic-lazy-trump-in-the-white-house-for-one-reason-the-wall/)
I can't believe that this woman still gets media attention. I've never cared for her.
-
Pam Key
Breitbart
February 1, 2019
More (https://www.breitbart.com/clips/2019/02/01/ann-coulter-we-put-lunatic-lazy-trump-in-the-white-house-for-one-reason-the-wall/)
I can't believe that this woman still gets media attention. I've never cared for her.
If that's how you feel, why do you post her crap? :tongue2: Just because it's fertilizer doesn't mean it needs to be spread around here.
-
Trump waited too long for his keystone issue to be addressed by our dead from the neck up Congress. He was manipulated to address Obamacare first, which was a total waste of time. The GOP did not have a sound replacement program to launch, and they pissed away the two years they had. Worthless!
Trump does not have a voting majority in either house of Congress, so nothing gets done with them involved. He can shut government down for ten years and the Democommies will not agree to do anything. I suggest he go and enjoy life on the golf course and execute a strategy for getting as many Republicans elected in 2020 so that he can get his policies implemented. That means a 60% majority+ in the Senate and majority in the House. Without that, he gets nothing, and Coulter should know that.
-
Ann, do you think your attempts to weaken Trump with his base will help or hurt the chances of getting the Wall.
Or do you only care about selling books and going on TV with Bill Maher?
-
Ann, do you think your attempts to weaken Trump with his base will help or hurt the chances of getting the Wall.
Or do you only care about selling books and going on TV with Bill Maher?
goopo
-
goopo
I was hoping no one would post on this thread because Ann is just sprinting for attention now.
But since a few people chose to give her some attention, I want to chime in to say she should stop crossing and re-crossing her legs on all TV appearances. It's getting old, and so is she.
-
Pam Key
Breitbart
February 1, 2019
More (https://www.breitbart.com/clips/2019/02/01/ann-coulter-we-put-lunatic-lazy-trump-in-the-white-house-for-one-reason-the-wall/)
I can't believe that this woman still gets media attention. I've never cared for her.
I like her more, recently.
-
Ann, do you think your attempts to weaken Trump with his base will help or hurt the chances of getting the Wall.
Or do you only care about selling books and going on TV with Bill Maher?
Didn't she used to sleep with him? Maher. Not Trump
-
Didn't she used to sleep with him? Maher. Not Trump
Maybe, but she seems a bit pale for his usual preferences.
https://m.ranker.com/list/women-who-bill-maher-has-dated/celebrityhookups
-
I was hoping no one would post on this thread because Ann is just sprinting for attention now.
But since a few people chose to give her some attention, I want to chime in to say she should stop crossing and re-crossing her legs on all TV appearances. It's getting old, and so is she.
Mark Simone, who’s the biggest Trump supporter on earth, interviews Coulter every Wednesday on local New York radio. Funny, but when she’s talking to him, especially this past week, she moderates her criticism of Trump. Still criticizes him, but without the over-the-top language. I think maybe when she’s addressing a liberal audience she turns it up a notch.
-
Maybe, but she seems a bit pale for his usual preferences.
https://m.ranker.com/list/women-who-bill-maher-has-dated/celebrityhookups
Wow. There must be a website somewhere about anything! lol
-
Wow. There must be a website somewhere about anything! lol
There are people out there who are burning to know who Bill Maher is dating. Probably the same people who sit in his show's studio audience and ballyhoo at every predictably snide comment he makes.
-
There are people out there who are burning to know who Bill Maher is dating. Probably the same people who sit in his show's studio audience and ballyhoo at every predictably snide comment he makes.
And I thought I had no life by hanging out here. Looks like I'm okay after all! :whistle:
-
There are people out there who are burning to know who Bill Maher is dating.
The people who Maher dated probably experience burning.
-
The people who Maher dated probably experience burning.
They got it from the toilet seat.
-
Maybe, but she seems a bit pale for his usual preferences.
https://m.ranker.com/list/women-who-bill-maher-has-dated/celebrityhookups
As for Annie, she upgraded to Muzzies, last I heard. I guess she's the kind that likes to be slapped around a bit.
-
He has everything he needs in front of him to accomplish this. The secure Fence Act allows the corps of engineers to modify plans based on needs (people get hung up on the word fence in the title but it is actually flexible in it's mode). He also has all the funds he needs in discretionary budgets under executive branch departments such as the DOD and Homeland Security. ($100 billion annually). It is just a matter of will and someone smart to work with the resources available.
It does make one wonder if he likes having the issue more than the wall. He wants to keep people pissed at others for not doing it and make them believe he is th victim.
-
I like her more, recently.
@Once-Ler
I don't object to the criticism of Trump. I've done so myself. I just don't care for Ann Coulter. :laugh:
-
He has everything he needs in front of him to accomplish this. The secure Fence Act allows the corps of engineers to modify plans based on needs (people get hung up on the word fence in the title but it is actually flexible in it's mode). He also has all the funds he needs in discretionary budgets under executive branch departments such as the DOD and Homeland Security. ($100 billion annually). It is just a matter of will and someone smart to work with the resources available.
It does make one wonder if he likes having the issue more than the wall. He wants to keep people pissed at others for not doing it and make them believe he is th victim.
In that way, he is just like every other corrupt politician in DC.......... an integral part of the "swamp."
The issue keeps him front and center. Solving the problem makes the reason he was elected go away.
-
He has everything he needs in front of him to accomplish this. The secure Fence Act allows the corps of engineers to modify plans based on needs (people get hung up on the word fence in the title but it is actually flexible in it's mode). He also has all the funds he needs in discretionary budgets under executive branch departments such as the DOD and Homeland Security. ($100 billion annually). It is just a matter of will and someone smart to work with the resources available.
It does make one wonder if he likes having the issue more than the wall. He wants to keep people pissed at others for not doing it and make them believe he is th victim.
Exactly. Discretionary funds are just that. Discretionary. Again, and I've stated this several times, for him to wait till just before the new Congress is sworn in to make a push for the border wall is very questionable. Several others have come forward and offered ways to fund the dang wall, but here we sit. Instead he calls in the media, makes a circus out of the situation, shuts down the government, offers DACA amnesty, which wasn't really an offer and now claims that he may have to declare a national emergency. I'm sorry, but I can't help but wonder what his true motives are and what's really going on.
-
If that's how you feel, why do you post her crap? :tongue2: Just because it's fertilizer doesn't mean it needs to be spread around here.
We are in the "Age of Outrages."
Kids taught screen addiction, in order to insult and be insulted on social media.
Losing out institutional knowledge and memory, in part because it is too dull.
Entertainment is violent, and unrealistic--but the yutes love it.
Coulter is I product of these times. Like Roger Stone, she knows any publicity is better than none.
She was entertaining the first time around. We are now seeing the same act over and over.
-
Kids taught screen addiction, in order to insult and be insulted on social media.
Losing out institutional knowledge and memory, in part because it is too dull. Entertainment is violent, and unrealistic--but the yutes love it.
Coulter is I product of these times.
Ah, Ann Coulter is pushing 60. She was born is 1961.
-
Ah, Ann Coulter is pushing 60. She was born is 1961.
Sixty may be the new fifty but it is still too old for tossing hair and crossing legs.
And I resent her using Trump to get attention. She used him when she supported him and now she's using him with negative remarks.
-
Sixty may be the new fifty but it is still too old for tossing hair and crossing legs.
And I resent her using Trump to get attention. She used him when she supported him and now she's using him with negative remarks.
@Emjay That's because she's a user. She bashed Bush in ugly ways. When he nominated Harriet Miers for SCOTUS she said it's obvious he's boozing again. Meirs was a lousy choice, granted (as bad as Kagan), but that was below the belt.
-
And I resent her using Trump to get attention. She used him when she supported him and now she's using him with negative remarks.
Absolutely right. Ann Coulter is following the footsteps of her former boyfriend Bill Maher. Both of these say deliberately provocative nonsense specifically to attract attention. Every thing they say, regardless of the topic or whoever the reference, is ultimately about themselves. It is all about publicity. It is all about staying relevant. It is all about attention at any cost.
The only reason Coulter is saying these things is to sell books. That is her only number one concern in life.
Obligatory Ann Coulter cheeseburger pic.
(http://sd.keepcalm-o-matic.co.uk/i/keep-calm-and-eat-a-burger-88.png)
-
Trump waited too long for his keystone issue to be addressed by our dead from the neck up Congress. He was manipulated to address Obamacare first, which was a total waste of time. The GOP did not have a sound replacement program to launch, and they pissed away the two years they had. Worthless!
Trump does not have a voting majority in either house of Congress, so nothing gets done with them involved. He can shut government down for ten years and the Democommies will not agree to do anything. I suggest he go and enjoy life on the golf course and execute a strategy for getting as many Republicans elected in 2020 so that he can get his policies implemented. That means a 60% majority+ in the Senate and majority in the House. Without that, he gets nothing, and Coulter should know that.
---------------------------
Getting R's elected is too stupid for words, as that
Party has been dead for a very long time.
-
---------------------------
Getting R's elected is too stupid for words, as that
Party has been dead for a very long time.
That's right... What does a 60% majority get you when half of them are RINOs?
-
---------------------------
Getting R's elected is too stupid for words, as that
Party has been dead for a very long time.
So what loser third party we should rally around? The Constitution Party?
-
Trump waited too long for his keystone issue to be addressed by our dead from the neck up Congress. He was manipulated to address Obamacare first, which was a total waste of time. The GOP did not have a sound replacement program to launch, and they pissed away the two years they had. Worthless!
Trump does not have a voting majority in either house of Congress, so nothing gets done with them involved. He can shut government down for ten years and the Democommies will not agree to do anything. I suggest he go and enjoy life on the golf course and execute a strategy for getting as many Republicans elected in 2020 so that he can get his policies implemented. That means a 60% majority+ in the Senate and majority in the House. Without that, he gets nothing, and Coulter should know that.
You can try to pass the buck, he is the President and he should set the agenda.
-
So what loser third party we should rally around? The Constitution Party?
You've already been losing for nigh on thirty years... So what difference would it make?
-
You've already been losing for nigh on thirty years... So what difference would it make?
The fact is, I'll never vote for a third party. I will continue to vote GOP till I die. Also, for god knows how long I have been hearing that GOP is dead or about to die. So are they going to die this time?
-
The fact is, I'll never vote for a third party. I will continue to vote GOP till I die. Also, for god knows how long I have been hearing that GOP is dead or about to die. So are they going to die this time?
Have at it... I may never vote GOP again. I haven't voted for a Republican president since Bush Jr (and barely him either, because of the war only), and doubt you will ever have another worth voting for
I am DONE voting for anything but Conservatism. Period. And that ain't Republicans.
-
Have at it... I may never vote GOP again. I haven't voted for a Republican president since Bush Jr (and barely him either, because of the war only), and doubt you will ever have another worth voting for
I am DONE voting for anything but Conservatism. Period. And that ain't Republicans.
I agree with you. I doubt that we will ever have another conservative/GOP to vote for. Not in my lifetime. I'm done voting as well unless by some miracle an actual conservative runs and conservative candidates are becoming far and few between.
-
America hasn't had strong leaders in decades largely because it is not politically correct to be strong in the USA. Strong politicians are decried as being racist, or some phobia, when all they want is to lead.
I have been on this earth 65 years, and President Donald Trump is in a league all his own. He is not an experienced politician, and yes he is caustic/abrasive even rude at times, but he fiercely wants to lead this country and restore us to be the greatest nation on earth. It is sad that both parties are not willing to work with him, and I especially fault the Republicans more than the Dems. If the Republicans perceived his greatness, they would have moved mountains to work with him in the first two years, but they did nothing in the Senate. NOTHING!
McConnell is the worst RINO we have in government. Between him and Ryan, Trump has had his hands full getting things done. Getting judges approved in the Senate should not be that big of a deal. Passing legislation on key issues defined by this president is a big deal, and the GOP has one to its credit in two years, the tax cut bill. THAT IS IT!. For what they do, they should not get paid.
-
The fact is, I'll never vote for a third party. I will continue to vote GOP till I die. Also, for god knows how long I have been hearing that GOP is dead or about to die. So are they going to die this time?
Take the RINOs out, if you can in the primaries, then vote GOP in the general (as long as the GOP candidate is not a complete ass like we had in 2008).
-
Have at it... I may never vote GOP again. I haven't voted for a Republican president since Bush Jr (and barely him either, because of the war only), and doubt you will ever have another worth voting for
I am DONE voting for anything but Conservatism. Period. And that ain't Republicans.
It to bad you don't realize that we have the most conservative post war president sitting in the White House right now. NeverTrump is insanity if you are a conservative (neocons are NOT conservatives).
-
I agree with you. I doubt that we will ever have another conservative/GOP to vote for. Not in my lifetime. I'm done voting as well unless by some miracle an actual conservative runs and conservative candidates are becoming far and few between.
@libertybele @roamer_1 Are you people living on the same planet? It's obvious that the democrats are getting crazier by the minute and you would allow them to get power? How self-destructive is that, which would be okay but you would take everyone with you.
Why don't you two get a tent in the woods and whine to each other? That would be great.
-
Pam Key
Breitbart
February 1, 2019
More (https://www.breitbart.com/clips/2019/02/01/ann-coulter-we-put-lunatic-lazy-trump-in-the-white-house-for-one-reason-the-wall/)
I can't believe that this woman still gets media attention. I've never cared for her.
@Machiavelli
The older she gets, the more she behaves like Glenn Close in Fatal Attraction when her pet politicians fail her.
Thanks for posting. I think we need to know what’s going on, and not only with people we happen to like.
-
Take the RINOs out, if you can in the primaries, then vote GOP in the general (as long as the GOP candidate is not a complete ass like we had in 2008).
That's been the plan since 1980... Continuing to do the same thing expecting different results is lunacy.
No thanks. I will vote for actual Conservatives, or not vote at all... Lending any other power to your 'team' goes in the wrong dang direction.
-
It to bad you don't realize that we have the most conservative post war president sitting in the White House right now. NeverTrump is insanity if you are a conservative (neocons are NOT conservatives).
Its too bad you don't realize that's total bullshit, and have the wool pulled over your eyes.
-
@libertybele @roamer_1 Are you people living on the same planet? It's obvious that the democrats are getting crazier by the minute and you would allow them to get power? How self-destructive is that, which would be okay but you would take everyone with you.
Why don't you two get a tent in the woods and whine to each other? That would be great.
What is obvious to me is that republicans are no different.
-
Its too bad you don't realize that's total bullshit, and have the wool pulled over your eyes.
Appoints reliably conservative judges, please tell me the last R president that did that? Fighting like hell to stop illegal immigration and secure our southern border. Please tell me the last R president to do that? Got us out of the several bad deals (Iran nuke deal, NAFTA, Paris accords). Please tell me the last R president to yank us out of bad international agreements? Fighting to bring jobs back to the USA and willing to use tariffs if that is what it takes. Please tell me the last R president to do that. Ended nation building as a national policy, ended the useless neocon wars. Please tell me the last R president to do that. Moved our embassy in Israel to the capital of Israel. Please tell me the last R president to do that. The most pro life president ever. Lowest unemployment in decades. Implementing gov reform (removing regs) on a massive scale and fighting voter fraud all while Dems and (NeverTrump) RINOs are doing everything they can to stop him.
Oh and let's not forget the tax cut and prison reform.
I voted Trump over (illegal) immigration but on just about every other issue I think he is doing great.
-
@libertybele @roamer_1 Are you people living on the same planet? It's obvious that the democrats are getting crazier by the minute and you would allow them to get power? How self-destructive is that, which would be okay but you would take everyone with you.
Why don't you two get a tent in the woods and whine to each other? That would be great.
@Emjay why don't you quit telling people how they should think? The GOP had the majority the past 4 years and the DEMS still maintained their power over them. Pelosi just handed Trump his behind and she even delayed his SOTU. I don't ever remember the DEM Speaker of the House delaying a SOTU address. That's just one example. The past several elections my choice as my senator was between Rubio (RINO) and a DEM. We need to get rid of RINO's and not keep voting them in just to oppose the DEM. I don't like Rubio. I don't like his recent stance against Trump, so why should I continue to vote for him? I'm all done having to vote for RINO's. IF and when a conservative runs, I'll cast my vote. Otherwise I'm just keeping the swamp creatures alive.
Secondly, you threatened awhile ago to put me on 'ignore'. I've done you the favor. Peace.
-
Appoints reliably conservative judges, please tell me the last R president that did that?
What 'reliably conservative judges'?
Fighting like hell to stop illegal immigration and secure our southern border. Please tell me the last R president to do that?
More show than go so far...
Got us out of the several bad deals (Iran nuke deal, NAFTA, Paris accords). Please tell me the last R president to yank us out of bad international agreements?
Yeah - Bullshit... go see if we are REALLY out of Paris. Go find out the difference between old and new nafta... It's all show.
Fighting to bring jobs back to the USA and willing to use tariffs if that is what it takes. Please tell me the last R president to do that.
Like that's working out so well...
Ended nation building as a national policy, ended the useless neocon wars. Please tell me the last R president to do that.
Oh that one is complete bullshit.
Moved our embassy in Israel to the capital of Israel. Please tell me the last R president to do that. The most pro life president ever.
Riiight... in temporary housing, and with zero commitment. I like it, but it can be reversed with the snap of a finger.
Lowest unemployment in decades. Implementing gov reform (removing regs) on a massive scale and fighting voter fraud all while Dems and (NeverTrump) RINOs are doing everything they can to stop him.
LOL! When you finally decide to quit suspending disbelief, the fall is going to hurt so bad...
Oh and let's not forget the tax cut and prison reform.
I voted Trump over (illegal) immigration but on just about every other issue I think he is doing great.
In the mean time, tax reform WITHOUT spending cuts means what? Where is the balanced budget?
Absolutely everything you have mentioned is pretty much self-contained, with no commitments beyond Tumpy's administration... The impact of Reagan's administration was an economy that lasted for twenty years... The impact of Tumpy, with the exception of judges (maybe) will be gone like a match being blown out... There is nothing there that we will get to keep.
I like you @jpsb ... We have stood shoulder to shoulder many times... I don't question your intention, nor your Conservatism... But yeah... you're walking down the garden path...
-
America hasn't had strong leaders in decades largely because it is not politically correct to be strong in the USA. Strong politicians are decried as being racist, or some phobia, when all they want is to lead.
I have been on this earth 65 years, and President Donald Trump is in a league all his own. He is not an experienced politician, and yes he is caustic/abrasive even rude at times, but he fiercely wants to lead this country and restore us to be the greatest nation on earth. It is sad that both parties are not willing to work with him, and I especially fault the Republicans more than the Dems. If the Republicans perceived his greatness, they would have moved mountains to work with him in the first two years, but they did nothing in the Senate. NOTHING!
McConnell is the worst RINO we have in government. Between him and Ryan, Trump has had his hands full getting things done. Getting judges approved in the Senate should not be that big of a deal. Passing legislation on key issues defined by this president is a big deal, and the GOP has one to its credit in two years, the tax cut bill. THAT IS IT!. For what they do, they should not get paid.
---------------------------------
Our self-taught Founders included Adams, Jefferson, Hamilton, Madison, Rutledge;
among the dozens who internalized the wisdom of the Ancient Greeks and Romans.
They were leaders who knew themselves, knew their enemies and understood
the vital importance of character in leaders and their subordinates.
What have we moderns produced??? The likes of Carter, Bush and Hilarity.
Given his nominees and putting excuses aside, does Trump know anyone
during his entire life who is not a clown, a failure or a hustler???
This is repeated across the globe w/a buffoon such as Missy May in the UK
which produced Wellington, Pitt, Palmerston, Disraeli; among many.
The same pattern exists in Germany given Murkey Merkel, a total schmuck.
This is so because John Q. Citizen permits it, being in thrall to party rather
than principle and will not change till plain people wake up and get their
head out of their keister.
We are hardly ordained to last forever despite the 'we are the greatest horse crap'.
History always has the last word. ALWAYS!
-
Absolutely everything you have mentioned is pretty much self-contained, with no commitments beyond Tumpy's administration... The impact of Reagan's administration was an economy that lasted for twenty years... The impact of Tumpy, with the exception of judges (maybe) will be gone like a match being blown out... There is nothing there that we will get to keep.
That might very well be true, but if it is blame the bastards in Congress not Trump.
Hoping Trump gets to put Amy Barrett in Ruth's seat. If that happens the SC will lean right for a generation if not longer. And then there is justice Thomas, who is thinking about retiring. If only for the courts alone, conservatives should be supporting Trump.
-
That might very well be true, but if it is blame the bastards in Congress not Trump.
Right, and that attitude is by design. The first thing he did walking in was to find someone to blame.
Hoping Trump gets to put Amy Barrett in Ruth's seat. If that happens the SC will lean right for a generation if not longer. And then there is justice Thomas, who is thinking about retiring. If only for the courts alone, conservatives should be supporting Trump.
So far, we have traded a Scalia and a Kennedy for two Kennedys - that's moving in the wrong direction.
(http://i.imgur.com/26EjxEV.jpg)
-
That might very well be true, but if it is blame the bastards in Congress not Trump.
Hoping Trump gets to put Amy Barrett in Ruth's seat. If that happens the SC will lean right for a generation if not longer. And then there is justice Thomas, who is thinking about retiring. If only for the courts alone, conservatives should be supporting Trump.
There's a huge difference between supporting President Trump and giving him a free pass on everything. Obviously others look at the issue differently.
-
If only for the courts alone, conservatives should be supporting Trump The Heritage Foundation, who made the list.
-
I don't trust the Heritage Foundation either - DeMint left with all haste. That makes me bloody well suspicious.
-
I don't trust the Heritage Foundation either - DeMint left with all haste. That makes me bloody well suspicious.
Point is, let's not pretend Trump knows anything about any of these people. He just nominates whoever people tell him would be a good choice or might fit the 'central casting' mold. Look at his recent AG nominee. He's been friends with Mueller for decades.
-
Point is, let's not pretend Trump knows anything about any of these people. He just nominates whoever people tell him would be a good choice or might fit the 'central casting' mold. Look at his recent AG nominee. He's been friends with Mueller for decades.
That's all right...
But if Heritage is throwin Kennedys, there is something vitally wrong with Heritage...
-
@Emjay why don't you quit telling people how they should think? The GOP had the majority the past 4 years and the DEMS still maintained their power over them. Pelosi just handed Trump his behind and she even delayed his SOTU. I don't ever remember the DEM Speaker of the House delaying a SOTU address. That's just one example. The past several elections my choice as my senator was between Rubio (RINO) and a DEM. We need to get rid of RINO's and not keep voting them in just to oppose the DEM. I don't like Rubio. I don't like his recent stance against Trump, so why should I continue to vote for him? I'm all done having to vote for RINO's. IF and when a conservative runs, I'll cast my vote. Otherwise I'm just keeping the swamp creatures alive.
Secondly, you threatened awhile ago to put me on 'ignore'. I've done you the favor. Peace.
@libertybele It's one thing to whine because everything doesn't go your way, but it's just silly to say you'll never vote Republican again. Right now, and in the forseeable future, there are only two choices.
-
I don't trust the Heritage Foundation either - DeMint left with all haste. That makes me bloody well suspicious.
Yes I noticed that too, good point.
-
That's all right...
But if Heritage is throwin Kennedys, there is something vitally wrong with Heritage...
I believe Trump takes advise on judges from the Federalist Society.
-
When Bill Maher first appeared on the scene, he was funny. The last 3-4 times I watched his program, he did not make me laugh once. His single focus anti-anyone conservative has grown old and boring. I haven't watched him in years, and did so this past year. How does he stay on cable? He is a major yawn!
And I applaud Coulter's rhetoric, for she is speaking the thoughts of many Trump supporters. If there is anything he MUST have a result on it is the wall. No progress on the wall in four years will definitively cost him votes. He cannot afford to lose anyone.
-
@Emjay I love ya Honey, but your relentless pursuit of @libertybele and @Chosen Daughter makes me further understand just how screwed up I am in always loving the one that has a tendency to twist my mind in understanding why.
(https://pics.onsizzle.com/why-cant-we-all-just-along-4744220.png)
-
I believe Trump takes advise on judges from the Federalist Society.
In early March 2016, following the death of Justice Antonin Scalia, Heritage’s John Malcolm published a list of potential Supreme Court justices in a Daily Signal article, “The Next Supreme Court Justice.†The non-exclusive list contained eight names, including Kavanaugh’s.
After releasing an initial list of 11 names in May 2016, Trump later added to his list to include Kavanaugh. Trump gave credit to The Federalist Society and The Heritage Foundation for helping to inform his thinking in compiling his own list.
https://www.heritage.org/impact/supreme-court-nominee-brett-kavanaugh-was-included-the-list-the-heritage-foundation-helped (https://www.heritage.org/impact/supreme-court-nominee-brett-kavanaugh-was-included-the-list-the-heritage-foundation-helped)
Apparently, both organizations contributed to the list.
-
Sixty may be the new fifty but it is still too old for tossing hair and crossing legs.
And I resent her using Trump to get attention. She used him when she supported him and now she's using him with negative remarks.
@Emjay
Wait—50 is too old to cross your legs? That sounds like Haircutter at TOS who said women ought to cut their hair short when they turn 40.
My mother-in-law is over 70 and crosses her legs sometimes— looks perfectly graceful.
-
@Emjay
Wait—50 is too old to cross your legs? That sounds like Haircutter at TOS who said women ought to cut their hair short when they turn 40.
My mother-in-law is over 70 and crosses her legs sometimes— looks perfectly graceful.
@QueenCatofAragon
Welcome back, missed you ;)
-
@Emjay I love ya Honey, but your relentless pursuit of @libertybele and @Chosen Daughter makes me further understand just how screwed up I am in always loving the one that has a tendency to twist my mind in understanding why.
(https://pics.onsizzle.com/why-cant-we-all-just-along-4744220.png)
I'm sorry @corbe but those women are unbearable. I only chastise them when I am absolutely driven to it by their mindless whining. So, it's not relentless, it is occasional.
It is also a waste of time, baby, and I need to stop. Twisting your mind even further would be cruel and unusual.
-
To clarify, a woman can cross her legs at any age, but crossing and re-crossing constantly during a single interview is not a good look.
-
@QueenCatofAragon
Welcome back, missed you ;)
@jpsb
Thank you! Doesn’t matter how often we disagree, I never take it personally.
-
@jpsb
Thank you! Doesn’t matter how often we disagree, I never take it personally.
:thumbsup:
-
:thumbsup:
@jpsb Let's hear it for the Nice Guys.