The Briefing Room
General Category => Health/Education => Topic started by: Elderberry on October 25, 2022, 12:49:03 am
-
WND 10/24/2022
'All of it says, my God, there was really a big, very risky research agenda underway'
A new pre-print study has concluded the virus that causes COVID-19 has a unique "fingerprint" indicating it originated in a laboratory rather than in nature.
Dr. Alex Washburne, a mathematical biologist, worked with researchers in the U.S. and Germany who studied the SARS-CoV-2 genome sequence and compared it to previously discovered coronaviruses.
They detected "peculiar patterns" they concluded were the hallmark of a manufactured virus, describing it having a "synthetic fingerprint."
Meanwhile, Jeffrey Sachs, chairman of The Lancet COVID-19 Commission, a task force that investigated the origins of COVID-19, has concluded after 22 months of study that SARS-CoV-2 probably was laboratory-generated and that the technology likely came from gain-of-function research funded by the U.S. National Institutes of Health.
The "synthetic fingerprint" discovered in the new study led by Washburne, says Sachs in an article published by Children's Health Defense, points to the work of Dr. Ralph Baric, a virologist at the University of North Carolina known for his NIH-funded gain-of-function research in cooperation with the Wuhan Institute of Virology.
Baric has developed a controversial "seamless ligation" technique designed to conceal evidence of human tampering in laboratory-created viruses. Baric nicknamed his invention the “no-see’m” method.
"It's the artist that doesn't sign his name to the painting; the virologist that doesn't put his signature into the virus to let us know whether or not it is emerging naturally or whether it is produced in a laboratory," said Sachs.
"All of it says, my God, there was really a big, very risky research agenda underway."
Evolutionary biologist Bret Weinstein called Baric's technique is the "exact opposite of what you would do if your interest was public health." Public health scientists would be marking their enhancements with red flags – not devising ways to hide them. The only reason you would want a concealer is to advance a sinister purpose – such as illegal bioweapons development – some mischief that the scientist didn’t want traceable back to his lab."
Baric taught his technique to the Wuhan Institute of Virology’s leading coronavirus researcher, Shi Zhengli, in 2016, CHD reported. In return, Baric received Chinese coronaviruses collected by Shi from bats in China's Yunnan province.
More: https://www.wnd.com/2022/10/study-finds-dr-faucis-fingerprint-origin-covid-virus/ (https://www.wnd.com/2022/10/study-finds-dr-faucis-fingerprint-origin-covid-virus/)
-
This comes as a complete surprise to none of us, I'm sure.
-
This comes as a complete surprise to none of us, I'm sure.
The surprise is that none of them read the bit in Nature from 2015, read the description of the chimera they'd created in North Carolina in 2014 from a segment of Bat Coronavirus and SARS, the symptoms it produced, its attachment at the ACE II receptor site, and its resistance to antivirals, nor bothered to note that two of the researchers were from the Wuhan Institute of Virology...
It did not take genius to connect those dots.