And unlike Chinese battery makers, Amazon did it all without US taxpayer subsidies.

Really?  Over the past decade, Amazon received at least $4.7 billion in  state and federal government subsidies around the world to support its build out of data centers, warehouses, offices, call centers, and film production projects.Feb 10, 2022

As of 2024 it is up to 6.7 billion.

Yet you've proven not to have even remedial knowledge of hydrogen as a storage medium for electricity.  Not to mention a complete lack of history, economics, and an ability to think critically.

I think you misfired.

Actually, I own a high-tech business genius.

Yet you've proven not to have even remedial knowledge of hydrogen as a storage medium for electricity.  Not to mention a complete lack of history, economics, and an ability to think critically.

And unlike Chinese battery makers, Amazon did it all without US taxpayer subsidies.

So tell me which of these companies is still in business:

Amazon
Solyndra
A123
Abound Solar
Beacon Power
Ener1
Fisker Automotive
Nevada Geothermal Power
Proterra

(Hint:  It's the only one in the list that wasn't subsidized by government)

Do you really want to go down that road.. Cherry picking a few companies that failed?  i can list thousands of US co's subsidized by the US govt that are succesful.

Well, you repeatedly mentioned solar panels and renewable energy upthread.

If not for climate change, why would you mention that at all? That has zip to do with the performance or cost benefits you claim EVs have.

You contradict yourself.

No I  said every US industry is subsidized and gave some examples and reasons why they do  it. Because again...huh other countries are heavily subsidizing their industries and if we do not  our US companies will be at huge disadvantage just as Boeng lost a 300 aircraft deal to airbus because the european countries heavily subsidized airbus.
Where did I say I believed in wind and solar?