The Briefing Room
General Category => National/Breaking News => Second Amendment => Topic started by: mystery-ak on July 22, 2021, 01:35:05 pm
-
CNN Town Hall: Joe Biden Suggests a 9mm Pistol Ban
AWR Hawkins
21 Jul 2021
During his Wednesday night CNN town hall, President Joe Biden talked about a “push to eliminate” 9mm pistols that have an ammunition capacity beyond that of which the left approves.
Biden said, “The idea you need a weapon that can have the ability to fire 20, 30, 40, 50, 120 shots from that weapon, whether it’s a 9mm pistol or whether it’s a rifle, is ridiculous. I’m continuing to push to eliminate the sale of those things.”
https://twitter.com/MattWalshBlog/status/1418019006880133122
more
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2021/07/21/cnn-town-hall-biden-suggests-9mm-pistol-ban/
-
Fact Check: Biden Suggests Mass Shooters Get Their Guns ‘Illegally’
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2021/07/21/biden-suggests-mass-shooters-get-guns-illegally/
-
Biden: ‘Ridiculous’ to Say You Need Assault Weapon That Can Fire ’20, 30, 40, 50, 120 Shots from that Weapon’
https://www.breitbart.com/clips/2021/07/21/biden-ridiculous-to-say-you-need-assault-weapon-that-can-fire-20-30-40-50-120-shots-from-that-weapon/
-
Fact Check: Biden Suggests Mass Shooters Get Their Guns ‘Illegally’
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2021/07/21/biden-suggests-mass-shooters-get-guns-illegally/
Which means more laws would not change their ability to get their guns.
-
The magazines for my 9mm pistol (the one I may lose someday in an unfortunate boating accident) hold 16 bullets, but I'm thinking of getting a 32-round extended mag, just 'cuz the Democrats don't want me to. :whistle:
-
Which means more laws would not change their ability to get their guns.
Never ask Democrats to use logic. It just confuses them and makes them angry.
-
Which means more laws would not change their ability to get their guns.
He's claiming gun shops are selling firearms without the requisite background checks, which I would wager is a damned lie.
-
He's claiming gun shops are selling firearms without the requisite background checks, which I would wager is a damned lie.
Should be easy enough to prove. Obtain from each manufacturer a list of weapons sold to various gun shops, go to each of those gun shops and confirm that the listed weapons are either (a) still in inventory, or (b) sold, with a valid background check on file. If, for some particular shop, there is a suspiciously large amount of inventory that was lost or destroyed, without a sufficiently reasonable explanation, then maybe that shop is engaged in illegal sales of firearms.
My guess is the inventory flow will show a remarkably high level of confidence upon audit - i.e., very little loss that cannot be chalked up to legitimate causes, such as theft (which the owner was not involved in).