Author Topic: Terrorism Resilience: Why Killing Their Leaders Doesn’t End the Threat  (Read 291 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Online rangerrebew

  • TBR Contributor
  • *****
  • Posts: 177,740
Terrorism Resilience: Why Killing Their Leaders Doesn’t End the Threat
by Albert Hadi
 
|
 
02.04.2025 at 06:00am
Terrorism Resilience: Why Killing Their Leaders Doesn’t End the Threat Image
Introduction
In recent years, the United States has adopted a targeted military approach, particularly decapitation strikes, as a key tactic to counter regional terrorist organizations. This strategy, aimed at dismantling these groups by eliminating their leadership, seeks to disrupt their operational capabilities and prevent further threats to US interests. While such strikes may offer temporary tactical victories, they have proven ineffective in achieving lasting peace or stability. The persistence of these terror organizations, despite the loss of key leaders, highlights the shortcomings of relying solely on military force. This article will argue that US over-reliance on military targeting fails to address the underlying sociopolitical and geopolitical drivers that sustain regional terrorist organizations, particularly in the context of Iran’s influence. The article will analyze the limitations of this approach, using Iran as a case study to illustrate how the manipulation of local grievances, coupled with a robust proxy network, continues to perpetuate instability. It will conclude with recommendations for more comprehensive strategies that address these foundational issues.

Iran as a Case Study
Iran’s strategic interest and influence in the Middle East has been a key factor in the persistence of regional terrorism. By skillfully exploiting sociopolitical grievances within local populations, Iran has been able to insert itself into the fabric of various societies across the region. This has been particularly evident in countries like Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, and Yemen, where Iran has capitalized on sectarian divisions, political disenfranchisement, and socioeconomic instability. The Iranian regime has strategically cultivated relationships with its proxies by providing financial, military, and ideological support while manipulating existing frameworks to establish a durable foothold. This strategy is underscored by a 2018 US State Department report, which disclosed that since 2012, Iran has allocated $16 billion to bolster the Assad regime and support its partners and proxies in Syria, Iraq, and Yemen.

The development and use of proxy forces have been central to Iran’s strategy. Rather than directly engaging in conventional warfare, Iran leverages groups like Hezbollah in Lebanon, the Popular Mobilization Forces (PMF) in Iraq, and the Houthis in Yemen to achieve specific operational outcomes. These groups not only act as instruments of Iranian influence but also serve as a tool to advance Iran’s geopolitical objectives, including the destabilization of US-aligned regimes and the weakening of American influence in the region. For the United States, the growing presence of these Iranian-backed proxy groups represents a significant risk to both regional and domestic security. These groups are not only a threat to US interests in the Middle East but also pose challenges to broader global stability, as their actions often lead to the escalation of conflicts and the destabilization of fragile states.

https://smallwarsjournal.com/2025/02/04/terrorism-resilience-why-killing-their-leaders-doesnt-end-the-threat/
The legitimate powers of government extend to such acts only as are injurious to others. But it does me no injury for my neighbor to say there are twenty gods, or no god. It neither picks my pocket nor breaks my leg.
Thomas Jefferson

Offline DefiantMassRINO

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13,877
  • Gender: Male
Re: Terrorism Resilience: Why Killing Their Leaders Doesn’t End the Threat
« Reply #1 on: February 04, 2025, 08:18:34 pm »
Ask yourself, how did these nomadic goat herders come to organize and possess what they do?  They are stealing money or receiving money from someone else.

The major sources of Sunni Islamic extremism are Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates, and Pakistan - the only three nations to recognize the Taliban Government of Afghanistan before 9/11.

The major source of Shi'ite Islamic extremism is Iran.

You can eliminate the leaves, the branches, and the stem, but as long as the roots remain, that weed can sprout again.

The US just needs to stop expending blood and treasure in the Middle East as centuries' long foes fight with each other - Jew vs Shi'ia vs Sunni - Turk vs Arab vs Persian.  We don't need them, their oil, their wealth, or their false friendship.


"If you think nobody cares about you, try missing a couple of payments." - Steven Wright

Offline Fishrrman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 37,525
  • Gender: Male
  • Dumbest member of the forum
Re: Terrorism Resilience: Why Killing Their Leaders Doesn’t End the Threat
« Reply #2 on: February 04, 2025, 10:46:58 pm »
It doesn't matter how many "terrorist leaders" are killed (the muslims, anyway).

Like sowing dragon's teeth on the ground, more will arise to fill their stead.

We can't "kill" the terrorists' penultimate leader.
That's because he's been dead for 1,400+ years.

He did, however, leave his "book of instructions" for the soldiers/fighters/terrorists to follow. You all know what that is.

And follow it they do.
And... will.

If we want the threat ended, we have only one course of action:
We must wipe out "the instruction book", by however manner required to do so.

Offline IsailedawayfromFR

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 20,360
Re: Terrorism Resilience: Why Killing Their Leaders Doesn’t End the Threat
« Reply #3 on: February 05, 2025, 02:55:58 am »
The only way to take out Islamic terrorism is that Muslims take them out.

Westerners cannot ID them, but their countrymen know who they are.

And Muslims know ways to deal with them that Westerners cannot, or will not do.
No punishment, in my opinion, is too great, for the man who can build his greatness upon his country's ruin~  George Washington