Author Topic: How Ted Cruz pulled off a decisive win and kept his White House hopes afloat  (Read 827 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Elderberry

  • TBR Contributor
  • *****
  • Posts: 19,237
The Texas Tribune By Jasper Scherer Nov. 14, 2024

Cruz won over Latino voters and targeted Colin Allred’s support of transgender rights to win a third term.

n the weeks leading up to Election Day, a series of polls found that U.S. Sen. Ted Cruz was in a familiar position: fighting for political survival in a state where other Republicans were routinely dominant.

But Cruz’s team felt confident. They were better positioned this election cycle overall and they’d identified what they saw as their ace in the hole: Democratic challenger Colin Allred’s record on transgender rights — specifically, the issue of transgender children playing in youth sports. The year before, Allred, a Dallas congressman, had voted against GOP legislation that proposed cutting off federal funds for school athletic programs that allowed “a person whose sex is male” to participate in women’s sports. The law defined sex as “based solely on a person’s reproductive biology and genetics at birth.”

Cruz and his allied political groups blitzed the airwaves with ads highlighting that vote and Allred’s other stances in favor of transgender rights. The ads, often featuring imagery of boys competing against girls in sports, reflected what Cruz’s team had found from focus groups and polling: Among the few million voters they’d identified who were truly on the fence, the transgender sports topic was most effective in driving support to Cruz, said Sam Cooper, a strategist for Cruz’s campaign.

“We felt like it was a double whammy for us, that it was an issue that, one, we had Allred dead to rights on, and two, it cut across all of our persuasion universes,” Cooper said. “It helped us with college-educated whites, which we needed, and also helped us with Hispanics,” for whom it was “the No. 1 persuadable issue.”

In the end, Cruz walloped Allred by nearly 9 percentage points, winning a majority of the statewide Latino vote and proving the polls dead wrong. Though the anti-trans ads may have contributed, Cruz also received a healthy boost from GOP nominee Donald Trump — who carried Texas by a whopping 14 points — and from voters’ sour outlook on the economy and immigration under Democratic management. About half of Texas voters cited one of those as the most important issue driving their vote, a bloc among which Cruz won more than 85%, according to exit polls.

Fresh off a 2018 reelection where he narrowly avoided becoming the first Texas Republican to lose statewide in decades, Cruz is emerging from last week’s win with his biggest jolt of political momentum in years, primed for an even bigger role on the national stage that could allow him to lay the groundwork for a future presidential run. He’s in line to head the Senate Commerce, Science and Transportation Committee under Trump's presidency. And he will retain a big megaphone with his nationally syndicated podcast and as a fixture in the conservative TV and talk radio ecosystem.

More: https://www.texastribune.org/2024/11/14/ted-cruz-texas-senate-win-transgender-rights-political-future/

Offline catfish1957

  • The Conservative Carp Rapscallion of Brieferville
  • Political Researcher
  • *****
  • Posts: 24,935
  • Gender: Male
Even as one of his earliest supporters.  ( i attended one of his first 10 town halls in his first GOP primary), I think Ted's expiration date as POTUS material has passed.  He is a great conservative, but lacks the interpersonal skills to pull it off.

We have better choices in our bench now with Vance, RDS, Youngkin, and Ramaswamy (eligible?)

I actually am hoping and rooting for him to be a SCOTUS replacement for Clarence Thomas.  That is the best use of his "best of class" legal skills
I display the Confederate Battle Flag in honor of my great great great grandfathers who spilled blood at Wilson's Creek and Shiloh.  5 others served in the WBTS with honor too.

Offline LadyLiberty

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,041
  • Gender: Female
Even though Beto and Allred lost to Cruz, in a way they still won. They filled their coffers full with out of state money, raising more than they ever could have running again for the office they currently held. Of course it was at the expense of other Dem races where that money might have actually made a difference. There are probably others already clamoring to be the next opponent to Cruz to see how much money they can get.

Offline IsailedawayfromFR

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13,710
Even as one of his earliest supporters.  ( i attended one of his first 10 town halls in his first GOP primary), I think Ted's expiration date as POTUS material has passed.  He is a great conservative, but lacks the interpersonal skills to pull it off.

We have better choices in our bench now with Vance, RDS, Youngkin, and Ramaswamy (eligible?)

I actually am hoping and rooting for him to be a SCOTUS replacement for Clarence Thomas.  That is the best use of his "best of class" legal skills
Agreed,  His real value is retaining his Senate seat to promote havoc for the Dems and representing us Texans.

Now he has 6 more years of doing that.

IMHO, Senators make poor Presidents.  As Senator, they don't run anything, but are hired to offer opinions and, famously like Teddy Kennedy, can be wrong +90% of the time, yet have zero accountability,  Governors always have accountability and have numerous agencies, and employees to manage, as well as budgets, etc.  They also have to balance a budget which Congress critters fail to do.

Obama and Biden were absolute disasters as Presidents, and only Jack Kennedy can I think did a reasonably good job of acting the role.  Likely due somewhat to his military experience and a seemingly genuine patriotic nature of doing good for the country.

As far as Cruz in Scotus, I prefer he run his course as Senator and do that after a couple more terms.  He is a good debater, but when one is dealing with the likes of Sotomayor, Kagan or Jackson, what is the point?  No one can argue with leftists no matter how good one's argument is because they will not agree, ever, with your point as it does not fit with theirs.
« Last Edit: November 14, 2024, 09:49:47 pm by IsailedawayfromFR »
“You will never understand bureaucracies until you understand that for bureaucrats procedure is everything and outcomes are nothing.” Thomas Sowell