General Category > Military/Defense News

Taking aim: Army leaders ponder mix of precision munitions vs conventional

(1/1)

rangerrebew:
Taking aim: Army leaders ponder mix of precision munitions vs conventional
Three four-star US Army generals this week weighed in with their opinions about finding the right balance between conventional and high-tech munitions - but the answers aren't easy.
By   ASHLEY ROQUE
on May 10, 2024 at 1:10 PM
 

WASHINGTON — This week, US Army Europe and Africa Commander Gen. Darryl Williams kicked off the annual Fires Symposium in Lawton, Okla. with, appropriately, a bit of a bombshell.

“Traditional cannon-based mass fires,” he told the audience, “are still the best solution in an EW environment.”

Williams, a veteran field artillery officer, has had a front row seat for nearly two years assessing some of those challenges and seeing how US provided weapons are working on the Ukrainian battlefield against an adversary with electronic warfare (EW) capabilities. Following decades of investments across the US military in precision capabilities, the claim that simpler weapons may be the best for the modern battlefield raises larger questions about whether the Army has been putting billions over billions of dollars down the wrong hole.

https://breakingdefense.com/2024/05/taking-aim-army-leaders-ponder-mix-of-precision-munitions-vs-conventional/

rangerrebew:
They can't keep conventional munitions in supply, how do they think they will do on high-tech.? :shrug:

Timber Rattler:
Translation...the U.S. Army has observed that the Russians have figured out how to jam precision guided munitions in Ukraine.

Navigation

[0] Message Index