Climate Queries: The Search for Gullibility
10 hours ago Charles Rotter
An academic group of climate communicators shameless propagandists from the Yale Program on Climate Change Communication Professional School of Public Manipulation and Indoctrination recently conducted a survey. Then they “analyzed” the results of their subjective questions and concluded they are very smart, that they need to gesticulate more, and scream louder.
These findings indicate that it is vital to communicate the five key facts about climate change: scientists agree, it’s real, it’s us, it’s bad, and there’s hope.
https://climatecommunication.yale.edu/publications/ask-an-expert/My commentary on this masturbatory “study” follows:
The Enigma of American Concern
What do Americans really want to know about climate change? The inquiry, as posed by a cadre of academics in a recent survey, might seem significant on its surface. Yet, it spirals into a narrative that inadvertently showcases a profound confusion and a hint of orchestrated alarmism about our environmental future. The revelation that a majority accept global warming as both real and human-caused should give the “researchers” orgasms, but the devil, as always, is in the details—or the lack thereof.
https://wattsupwiththat.com/2024/04/23/climate-queries-unveiling-the-curiosity-of-the-american-public/
