I understand the point, but I don't really buy it. Elections are generally decided by a narrow enough margin that every vote matters. Even if 80% of voters are only voting against the other side, that other 20% still matters a lot.
Also, we see lots of politicians pander to voters by voting in favor of various programs or policies. They're not just pointing at the other side's negatives.
I don't really agree with the larger point that politicians "learn" from elections. Generally, there are just too many different issues, and voters are motivated by such widely disparate and often contradictory reasons that it is very rare you can isolate a single issue as "the" reason for a loss. Abortion and immigration, maybe. But that's about it.
None of that matters - It's all strategery.
I am talking about the individual vote - What it means. To me, I am no longer willing to buy into the plastic bullshit on the stump. It means nothing. But it is there to influence the unwary - It sounds good, so they buy in. But then that candidate gets elected and goes about party business instead of his supposed promises. And party business is diametrically opposed to those promises.
But he'll sell bullshit every 4 to six years and get elected again
and again.
and again.
At some point you - I mean !YOU! - have to take responsibility for the shit they're really doing. Y'all keep putting them in there.
Well that's what I have done. I am no longer willing to blindly endorse anyone when the party is just as corrupt and hell bent on globalism as the Democrats are.
And with that, my vote - My endorsement - suddenly gained in value, because of its rarity. Because it is no longer inflated by party bullshit. It means something now.
Tumpy is no different than Romney. Same thing. Same big-city liberal mentality. Tie that with his record and there is no way in hell he gains my approval.
What he is is exactly the opposite of what I believe in, and he's selling liberalism... To the Right. There is nothing to be gained in stategery with that.
So why EXACTLY should I vote for the exact opposite of what I want?
How does that profit me, or my political fellows?
To what end, if I throw my vote away on that?
It's LESS than disenfranchisement. It's actively approving that to which I am diametrically opposed. My vote at that point is less than worthless.