General Category > Second Amendment
Gun Ban for Non-Violent Illegal Immigrant Found Unconstitutional [Update]
Elderberry:
The Reload by Stephen Gutowski 3/14/2024
The Second Amendment protects people’s ability to own a gun even if they’ve entered the country illegally.
That’s the ruling handed down by US District Judge Sharon Johnson Coleman on Friday. She found the federal prohibition on illegal immigrants owning guns is unconstitutional, at least as applied to Heriberto Carbajal-Flores. She ruled the ban did not fit with America’s historical tradition of gun regulation as required under the Supreme Court’s landmark New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v. Bruen ruling.
“The noncitizen possession statute, 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(5), violates the Second Amendment as applied to Carbajal-Flores,” Judge Colman wrote in US v. Carbajal-Flores. “Thus, the Court grants Carbajal-Flores’ motion to dismiss.”
The ruling is the latest fallout from the new standard for Second Amendment cases set in Bruen. Since the landmark case was decided in 2022, a wide swath of state and federal gun restrictions have come under increased scrutiny in the courts. Among the most commonly recurring questions raised by the new standard is who can be barred from owning guns, and the Carbajal-Flores case is among the first to examine whether people who entered the country illegally are among them.
Judge Coleman, a Barack Obama appointee, initially found the gun ban for illegal immigrants was constitutional back in April 2022. However, she agreed to reconsider the case in light of rulings from the federal appeals courts in the Third and Seventh Circuit that questioned whether those convicted of non-violent crimes could be permanently disarmed after the High Court handed down Bruen in June 2022. She concluded breaking misdemeanor immigration laws alone is not enough justification to strip somebody of their gun rights under the new test.
“[C]arbajal-Flores has never been convicted of a felony, a violent crime, or a crime involving the use of a weapon. Even in the present case, Carbajal-Flores contends that he received and used the handgun solely for self-protection and protection of property during a time of documented civil unrest in the Spring of 2020,” Judge Coleman wrote. “Additionally, Pretrial Service has confirmed that Carbajal-Flores has consistently adhered to and fulfilled all the stipulated conditions of his release, is gainfully employed, and has no new arrests or outstanding warrants.”
The Department of Justice (DOJ) argued the modern ban was akin to historical bans on loyalists owning guns during the Founding Era and should stand. However, Judge Coleman found that historical ban included exceptions that imply the ban was based on the actions of individual loyalists.
More: https://thereload.com/gun-ban-for-non-violent-illegal-immigrant-found-unconstitutional/
LMAO:
Um…. entering the country illegally in itself is a felony.
Bigun:
--- Quote from: LMAO on March 17, 2024, 01:21:39 pm ---Um…. entering the country illegally in itself is a felony.
--- End quote ---
So is aiding and abetting anyone committing a crime.
LMAO:
Is anybody aware of this judges view on private firearm ownership of legal citizens of this country?
Elderberry:
--- Quote from: LMAO on March 17, 2024, 01:21:39 pm ---Um…. entering the country illegally in itself is a felony.
--- End quote ---
If one commits a felonious offense but is not charged and convicted, then they are not felons.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
Go to full version