JUST IN: Supreme Court Sets Unusual Opinion Release For Monday Morning

[libertybele]

Conway: SCOTUS Reverse on Trump Ballot Ban Incoherent, ‘Shoddy Legal Work All Around’

Attorney George Conway said Monday on CNN’s “The Source” that the Supreme Court unanimously overturning a Colorado Supreme Court ruling that disqualified former President Donald Trump from the ballot was “shoddy legal work all around by all the justices.”

https://www.breitbart.com/clips/2024/03/04/conway-scotus-reverse-on-trump-ballot-ban-incompetent-shoddy-legal-work-all-around/

Ramaswamy warns liberal justices 'buying political latitude' with 9-0 ruling as more Trump cases lie ahead


After the decision was handed down, Ramaswamy echoed Trump's belief that it represented a "case of national unity," and that the United States cannot essentially be united if a "patchwork" of states can make unilateral decisions about a national candidate's eligibility beyond the typical age and tenure statutes.

"That doesn't work if we're one nation. So that's what this case was really about," he said. "I do think that this is not just about President Trump, but about the future unity of our country itself. And the Supreme Court, 9-0, came down on the right side of that question."

Of the concurrence written by the three liberal justices, Biden appointee Ketanji Brown Jackson and Obama appointees Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan, Ramaswamy said the subtext therein is that the bench is "buying themselves some political latitude to say there's going to be other Trump related cases that come before the Supreme Court now.".................

I'm not a van of Ramsy's but he does make some very valid points. 

https://www.foxnews.com/media/ramaswamy-liberal-justices-buying-political-latitude-9-0-ruling-trump-cases-lie-ahead

[Bigun]

Ramaswamy warns liberal justices 'buying political latitude' with 9-0 ruling as more Trump cases lie ahead


After the decision was handed down, Ramaswamy echoed Trump's belief that it represented a "case of national unity," and that the United States cannot essentially be united if a "patchwork" of states can make unilateral decisions about a national candidate's eligibility beyond the typical age and tenure statutes.

"That doesn't work if we're one nation. So that's what this case was really about," he said. "I do think that this is not just about President Trump, but about the future unity of our country itself. And the Supreme Court, 9-0, came down on the right side of that question."

Of the concurrence written by the three liberal justices, Biden appointee Ketanji Brown Jackson and Obama appointees Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan, Ramaswamy said the subtext therein is that the bench is "buying themselves some political latitude to say there's going to be other Trump related cases that come before the Supreme Court now.".................

I'm not a van of Ramsy's but he does make some very valid points. 

https://www.foxnews.com/media/ramaswamy-liberal-justices-buying-political-latitude-9-0-ruling-trump-cases-lie-ahead

As matters of law, there is no doubt as to the outcome of those cases should be but with John Roberts involved, I'll not be making any bets.

[libertybele]

As matters of law, there is no doubt as to the outcome of those cases should be but with John Roberts involved, I'll not be making any bets.

Same here.  I have zero confidence that he will rule as he should.