I know you were referencing @DCPatriot in this post, but I'm accused of this on a regular basis, so, I thought I'd take a shot at explaining. At this point, your questions lack sincerity. It's become clear that you're simply looking to entertain yourself. Every one of your questions -- and more -- have been asked and answered dozens of times ---- each answer met not with discussion, but with an abundance of snark and ridicule.
You're unserious @LMAO and on top of this you have no right to demand anyone engage your self-serving whims. By all means, continue to ask your question(s) ---- but, stop the demands and let the chips fall where they may.
See you around campus. :see:
Lol
Your reply to me beautifully illustrates exactly the point I was making regarding Trump supporters inability to defend his record when confronted
You claim that you’ve addressed each one of these issues before, but the fact is you have not.
Everything I listed above is factual. But because you can’t address them, you’ve decided to make me personally the issue.
And if you referring to your previous “Kaching” post from another thread, what I did was take apart each one of your Kaching claims and confront you with the reality and record vs the claims you were making which then upset you because you were unable to provide a counter point Remember, this isn’t TruthSocial. Was my reply to your “Kaching” claims a little snarky? Sure. But accurate
RIVs tactic here is both expected and understandable from her perspective. But the fact is her and her cohorts actually dodge the issues that I’ve raised. And it’s dishonest for her to claim that she has addressed these issues because she has not.
Her refusal to answer or address points that she finds uncomfortable is well known by all members
Your definition of addressing an issue or answering questions means deflecting, attacking, avoiding, dodging.
If the reaction we see here from his supporters is similar to how Trump will react to his record being exposed in the heat of the campaign, the Democrats are going to eat him for breakfast
BTW, going forward, you should learn what a conversation is about before injecting yourself into it . I was addressing a claim made by another poster