Jim Jordan To CIA: How Many Hunter Biden Laptop Letter Signatories Were On Your Payroll? Tristan Ju

[mystery-ak]

Jordan To CIA: How Many Biden Laptop Letter Signers Were On Your Payroll?
Tristan Justice


House Judiciary Chairman Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, is investigating whether the 51 former intelligence officials who signed the infamous Hunter Biden laptop letter were paid by the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA).

After Hunter Biden’s abandoned laptop surfaced during the 2020 election, more than 50 former intelligence officials signed a letter in Politico saying the computer “has all the classic earmarks of a Russian information operation.” In a letter to CIA Director William Burns on Monday, Jordan, who leads the Select Subcommittee on the Weaponization of the Federal Government, demanded the CIA chief come clean about the agency’s alleged involvement in branding the laptop as Russian disinformation, which plainly amounted to election interference.

“We understand that former intelligence officials often return to the intelligence community under private contract for their previous agencies,” Jordan wrote. “It is vital to the Committees’ oversight to understand whether any of the signatories of the public statement were actively employed by CIA as contractors or consultants at the time they signed the public statement.”

more
https://thefederalist.com/2023/12/08/jim-jordan-to-cia-how-many-hunter-biden-laptop-letter-signatories-were-on-the-cias-payroll/

[DefiantMassRINO]

This will backfire.

In addition to the miltary, the CIA will have recruiting shortfalls because of @$$ clowns like Jim Jordan and Tommy Tuberville.

The Russia-China-Iran-North Korea Axis of Evil will be most pleased.

The MAGAS are degrading the Federal Government's Defense Capabilities from within.

[Maj. Bill Martin]

I don't see anything wrong with the question, and in fact there is a lot right with it.  The answer doesn't have to "name names".  Just a raw number of how many of the signatories of that letter received payment other than pensions, directly or indirectly, from the CIA within calendar year 2016.

That letter was a disgrace when it was signed, so it's a fair point of inquiry to know if it was essentially funded by the U.S. government.

[DCPatriot]

I don't see anything wrong with the question, and in fact there is a lot right with it.  The answer doesn't have to "name names".  Just a raw number of how many of the signatories of that letter received payment other than pensions, directly or indirectly, from the CIA within calendar year 2016.

That letter was a disgrace when it was signed, so it's a fair point of inquiry to know if it was essentially funded by the U.S. government.