General Category > Trump Legal Investigations

An Old Video Emerges of the Judge in Trump’s Fraud Case, Uncovering Disturbing Revelations

(1/3) > >>

American Girl:
Yep, nothing to see. This man will surely get a fair trial.
This is infuriating!

That video should be enough to throw the case out or demand a different judge of the defendant's choice

https://defiantamerica.com/an-old-video-emerges-of-the-judge-in-trumps-fraud-case-uncovering-disturbing-revelations/

jmyrlefuller:
Ah, the art of the ad hominem fallacy, the Trump campaign's calling card.

Maj. Bill Martin:
Wait a minute.  Exactly what did the judge say in that video that was so disturbing or out of bounds?  I watched the whole thing and didn't see it.

The part where he's talking about the ability to toss a civil verdict that he doesn't think is supported by the evidence -- a jnov or "judgment not withstanding the verdict" is an accepted part of the rules of civil procedure in both state and federal court.  They happen with some frequency.  So what else was there?

LMAO:

--- Quote from: Maj. Bill Martin on October 03, 2023, 12:32:27 pm ---Wait a minute.  Exactly what did the judge say in that video that was so disturbing or out of bounds?  I watched the whole thing and didn't see it.

--- End quote ---

I’ve learned to be very suspicious of the links this “American Girl” posts

They leave a lot of pertinent information out and their new sources I’ve never heard of

They contain little snippets of information that you have to search for in other sources to put the complete puzzle together

Maj. Bill Martin:

--- Quote from: LMAO on October 03, 2023, 12:35:57 pm ---I’ve learned to be very suspicious of the links this “American Girl” posts

--- End quote ---

You and me both.

The weird part about it is that jnov's only apply in jury trials.  Since Trump's case is being tried to the bench without a jury, the issue of a jnov doesn't even apply.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

Go to full version