Author Topic: Should We Play Politics with the Nation's Defense? The Supreme Court's Ruling in Students for Fair A  (Read 209 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline rangerrebew

  • TBR Contributor
  • *****
  • Posts: 167,105
Should We Play Politics with the Nation's Defense? The Supreme Court's Ruling in Students for Fair Admissions v. Harvard College and the U.S. Service Academies
49 Pages
Posted:
Paul J. Larkin
The Heritage Foundation

Charles D. Stimson
affiliation not provided to SSRN

Thomas W. Spoehr
affiliation not provided to SSRN

Date Written: September 15, 2023

Abstract
Congress has chartered the U.S. service academies to graduate officers capable of serving in leadership roles to protect the nation and its citizens against anyone who would visit harm on us. But neither those institutions, their superintendents, nor the President is above the law. The Supreme Court held in Fair Admissions that it meant what it said in Brown v. Board of Education that no one should be denied equal educational opportunity due to his or her skin color. Only in extraordinarily rare circumstances—where the government must achieve or protect a compelling interest, such as remedying illegality or saving life; where the government tailors its use of race to achieve only that goal; where there is a clear basis for judicial review of the government’s asserted need for discrimination; and where there is a clear temporal and physical limitation on the government’s use of race—may the government deny a person a benefit offered to someone else because of race or ethnicity. Just as the civilian law enforcement and intelligence communities can consider race when making undercover assignments, so, too, the military can justify race- or ethnicity-based operational field assignments for personnel tasked in an intelligence-gathering capacity.

What does that mean for the U.S. service academies? The academies cannot make a persuasive case for a race-based admissions policy. There is no legally or factually significant difference between those institutions and the public and private institutions that must comply with the Supreme Court’s Fair Admissions decision. Accordingly, the academies cannot lawfully discriminate on the basis of race when making admission decisions.

https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4577628
The legitimate powers of government extend to such acts only as are injurious to others. But it does me no injury for my neighbor to say there are twenty gods, or no god. It neither picks my pocket nor breaks my leg.
Thomas Jefferson

Offline rangerrebew

  • TBR Contributor
  • *****
  • Posts: 167,105
Absolutely not!  And that includes wokeness, DEI, CRT, gay rights, and any other social issues.  The defense should be based on ability, not skin color or gender. :amen:
« Last Edit: September 28, 2023, 11:50:27 am by rangerrebew »
The legitimate powers of government extend to such acts only as are injurious to others. But it does me no injury for my neighbor to say there are twenty gods, or no god. It neither picks my pocket nor breaks my leg.
Thomas Jefferson