Will alarmists and skeptics ever agree on the causes of climate change?

[rangerrebew]

Will alarmists and skeptics ever agree on the causes of climate change?


By Ap Cloosterman.

There are gases in our atmosphere, which make life difficult for us, but on the other hand are necessary for the growth and flowering of plant, animal and human life as well as for our well-being, such as:

Nitrogen (nitrogen oxides NOx and ammonia NH3)
Carbon dioxide (CO2)
Methane (CH4)
Methane has been chosen as the subject of this article. Methane as a greenhouse gas



Figure 1.

Methane CH4: C = carbon and H = hydrogen

Methane is a colorless gas that is the main component of natural gas. As a greenhouse gas, methane is about 25 to 34 times stronger than CO₂. Methane is produced naturally by bacteria in the decomposition of dead plants and animals. Methane mainly arises in wet natural areas such as marshes and peat bogs, but is also produced in our intestines, for example.

The methane content in our atmosphere is rising. See: figure 2.

https://www.climategate.nl/2023/08/worden-alarmisten-en-sceptici-het-ooit-eens-over-de-oorzaken-van-klimaatverandering/

[Smokin Joe]

No. Assuming "Climate Change" is meant to be Anthropomorphic in nature as expressed in this argument, that won't happen.

There are people looking to blame people for the natural processes that have been at work on this planet since the beginning.

Others believe, (imho, with good reason), that any human contribution to those processes is so negligible as to be essentially unmeasureable.
Sure, we can make the air icky in certain geographies, if we try really, really hard. But on the planetary scale, even those minuscule overall (global) deviations from what might have been without those contributions pales in comparison to the changes which have occurred naturally without the benefit of any human input.

[Fishrrman]

No.
Next question ...?