Author Topic: The disqualification of Donald Trump and other legal urban legends by Jonathan Turley  (Read 235 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Online mystery-ak

  • Owner
  • Administrator
  • ******
  • Posts: 386,152
  • Let's Go Brandon!
 The disqualification of Donald Trump and other legal urban legends
by Jonathan Turley, Opinion Contributor - 08/19/23 10:30 AM ET

The popularity of urban legends is a testament to the will to believe. The desire of people to keep Elvis alive or prove that a Sasquatch could exist furtively in our backyards shows the resilience of fables.

Constitutional urban legends often have an even more immediate appeal and tend to arise out of the desperation of divided times. One of the most popular today is that former President Donald Trump can be barred from office, even if he is not convicted in any of the four indictments he faces, under a long-dormant clause of the 14th Amendment.

This 14th Amendment theory is something that good liberals will read to their children at night. It goes something like this: Donald Trump can never be president again, because the 14th Amendment bars those who previously took federal oaths from assuming office if they engaged in insurrection or rebellion. With that, and a kiss on the forehead, a progressive’s child can sleep peacefully through the night.

But don’t look under the bed. For as scary as it might sound to some, Trump can indeed take office if he is elected…even if he is convicted. Indeed, he can serve as president even in the unlikely scenario that he is sentenced to jail.

more
https://thehill.com/opinion/judiciary/4158573-the-disqualification-of-donald-trump-and-other-legal-urban-legends/
Proud Supporter of Tunnel to Towers
Support the USO
Democrat Party...the Party of Infanticide

“Therefore do not worry about tomorrow, for tomorrow will worry about itself. Each day has enough trouble of its own.”
-Matthew 6:34

Offline DefiantMassRINO

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10,710
  • Gender: Male
Why don't states require Presidential candidates to submit long-form birth certificates and previous three years tax returns as a requirements to get their names on that state's ballots?

1.) Long-form birth certificate would be a check against a non-native-born American from being on the ballot.

2.) The tax returns would be a check against foreign emoluments.

Since elections for Federal Office are state elections, the states will be the primary check for Constitutionally qualified candidates.
"It doesn't matter what temperature the room is, it's always room temperature." - Steven Wright