Author Topic: Biden Admin Pushes Supreme Court To Rule Against Red State Laws Blocking Online Censorship  (Read 168 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline rangerrebew

  • TBR Contributor
  • *****
  • Posts: 167,540
Biden Admin Pushes Supreme Court To Rule Against Red State Laws Blocking Online Censorship
Story by Jason Cohen •
 
President Joe Biden’s administration in a Monday amicus brief pushed the Supreme Court to rule against Republican-led states’ laws that prevent online censorship.

Florida and Texas have enacted laws to stop Big Tech platforms from censoring content due to viewpoint, and the Biden administration asked for the Supreme Court to review them, according to the brief. Specifically, the Biden administration requested for the Supreme Court to rule against the states’ laws and in favor of social media companies’ right to censor.
 
“The platforms’ content-moderation activities are protected by the First Amendment,” U.S. Solicitor General Elizabeth Prelogar wrote in the Biden administration’s brief. “Given the torrent of content created on the platforms, one of their central functions is to make choices about which content will be displayed to which users, in which form and which order.”

WASHINGTON, DC – JULY 20: Democratic presidential candidate Robert F. Kennedy Jr. speaks during a hearing with the House Judiciary Subcommittee on the Weaponization of the Federal Government on Capitol Hill on July 20, 2023 in Washington, DC. Members of the committee held the hearing to discuss instances of the U.S. government’s alleged censoring of citizens, political figures and journalists. (Photo by Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images)

Florida’s bill prohibits social media platforms from “willfully deplatform[ing] a candidate” for public office and enables Florida to fine a platform $250,000 per day, according to the brief. Texas’ bill broadly blocks platforms with more than 50 million monthly American users from engaging in viewpoint censorship, according to the brief.

The bills are similar but not the same, and the brief requests the Supreme Court to hear cases on both laws.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/biden-admin-pushes-supreme-court-to-rule-against-red-state-laws-blocking-online-censorship/ar-AA1fj9sV?ocid=msedgdhp&pc=U531&cvid=373238edfd5248538b1b71a2ffa7630c&ei=42
The legitimate powers of government extend to such acts only as are injurious to others. But it does me no injury for my neighbor to say there are twenty gods, or no god. It neither picks my pocket nor breaks my leg.
Thomas Jefferson