The U.N. Is Planning To Seize Global ‘Emergency’ Powers With Biden’s Support

[Kamaji]

The U.N. Is Planning To Seize Global ‘Emergency’ Powers With Biden’s Support

The proposal might be the biggest attempted power grab in the history of the United Nations. If approved, the United States as we know it could cease to exist.

By: Justin Haskins
July 04, 2023

In September 2024, less than two months before the next U.S. presidential election, the United Nations will host a landmark “Summit of the Future,” where member nations will adopt a Pact for the Future. The agreement will solidify numerous policy reforms offered by the U.N. over the past two years as part of its sweeping Our Common Agenda platform.

Although there are numerous radical proposals included in the agenda, perhaps none are more important than the U.N. plan for a new “emergency platform,” a stunning proposal to give the U.N. significant powers in the event of future “global shocks,” such as another worldwide pandemic.

Many of the details of the U.N. emergency platform were laid out in a March 2023 policy paper titled “Strengthening the International Response to Complex Global Shocks — An Emergency Platform.” In the paper, the U.N. secretary-general writes, “I propose that the General Assembly provide the Secretary-General and the United Nations system with a standing authority to convene and operationalize automatically an Emergency Platform in the event of a future complex global shock of sufficient scale, severity and reach.”

Once triggered, the emergency platform would give the U.N. the ability to “actively promote and drive an international response that places the principles of equity and solidarity at the centre of its work.” The U.N. would bring together the “stakeholders” of the world, including academics, governments, private sector actors, and “international financial institutions” to ensure there is a unified, global response to the crisis.

The emergency platform would also give the United Nations the power to “Ensure that all participating actors make commitments that can contribute meaningfully to the response and that they are held to account for delivery on those commitments.”

In other words, the United Nations would be given unprecedented authority over the public and private sectors of huge swaths of the world, all in the name of battling a yet unknown crisis.

It Gets Worse

As difficult as it might be to believe, the story gets even worse from here. Although the duration of the emergency platform would initially be set for a “finite period,” at “the end of that period, the Secretary-General could extend the work of an Emergency Platform if required,” according to the United Nations’ own policy proposal.

That means the secretary-general would have the authority to keep the emergency platform in place indefinitely, all without reauthorization from member nations.

What kind of “global shock” would trigger the emergency platform? The U.N. provides several possible examples in its formal proposal, including a “major climatic event,” “future pandemic risks,” a “global digital connectivity disruption,” “major event in outer space,” and, my personal favorite, “unforeseen risks, (‘black swan’ events).”

*  *  *

Source:  https://thefederalist.com/2023/07/04/the-u-n-is-planning-to-seize-global-emergency-powers-with-bidens-support/

[Maj. Bill Martin]

It'll be just as binding and enforceable as is any other U.N. proclamation, which is "not at all".

[mountaineer]

UPDATE March 19, 2024

Dr. Kat Lindley
@KLVeritas
If you are bored, you should dig into the United Nations Pact for the Future (btw this is our future and our kids future they are discussing). The WHO pandemic agreement is a child's play compared to this.

While we are distracted by many things, the UN is planning a Summit for the Future in September 2024. The aim of the Summit is to "accelerate efforts to meet our existing international commitments and take concrete steps to respond to emerging challenges and opportunities. This will be achieved through an action-oriented outcome document called the Pact for the Future.The Pact will be negotiated, and endorsed by countries in the lead-up to and during the Summit in September 2024."


1:48 PM · Mar 19, 2024

Link to draft: https://www.un.org/sites/un2.un.org/files/sotf-co-facilitators-zero-draft_pact-for-the-future.pdf

[Texas Yellow Rose]

And this has been in the works for a long time

1992:  Agenda 21 is a non-binding action plan of the United Nations with regard to sustainable development. It is a product of the Earth Summit (UN Conference on Environment and Development) held in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, in 1992. It is an action agenda for the UN, other multilateral organizations, and individual governments around the world that can be executed at local, national, and global levels. One major objective of the Agenda 21 initiative is that every local government should draw its own local Agenda 21. Its aim initially was to achieve global sustainable development by 2000, with the "21" in Agenda 21 referring to the original target of the 21st century.

Sustainable Development Goals include water, energy, climate, oceans, urbanization, transport, science and technology.

Now we are dealing with "The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development" /sic

It all sounds just "peachy keen".   
Read here for details:  https://sdgs.un.org/goals#History
 

2Co 11:14
And do not marvel; for Satan himself is transformed into an angel of light.
antichrist.  Strong's also uses the words "instead of" for anti

[libertybele]

And this has been in the works for a long time

1992:  Agenda 21 is a non-binding action plan of the United Nations with regard to sustainable development. It is a product of the Earth Summit (UN Conference on Environment and Development) held in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, in 1992. It is an action agenda for the UN, other multilateral organizations, and individual governments around the world that can be executed at local, national, and global levels. One major objective of the Agenda 21 initiative is that every local government should draw its own local Agenda 21. Its aim initially was to achieve global sustainable development by 2000, with the "21" in Agenda 21 referring to the original target of the 21st century.

Sustainable Development Goals include water, energy, climate, oceans, urbanization, transport, science and technology.

Now we are dealing with "The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development" /sic

It all sounds just "peachy keen".   
Read here for details:  https://sdgs.un.org/goals#History
 

2Co 11:14
And do not marvel; for Satan himself is transformed into an angel of light.
antichrist.  Strong's also uses the words "instead of" for anti

Yes, this has been in the works for quite awhile and in fact Barrack as a Senator tried to pass his Global Poverty Act - S.2433 -- later as president he continued what he started.  All that we are seeing now, IMHO is his handiwork.

Here is a list of bills that he sponsored, including the Global Poverty Act - S.2433

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_bills_sponsored_by_Barack_Obama_in_the_United_States_Senate

Global Poverty Act of 2007 - Directs the President, through the Secretary of State, to develop and implement a comprehensive strategy to further the U.S. foreign policy objective of promoting the reduction of global poverty, the elimination of extreme global poverty, and the achievement of the United Nations Millennium Development Goal of reducing by one-half the proportion of people, between 1990 and 2015, who live on less than $1 per day.

Requires the strategy to contain specific and measurable goals and to consist of specified components, including: (1) continued investment or involvement in existing U.S. initiatives related to international poverty reduction and trade preference programs for developing countries; (2) improving the effectiveness of development assistance and making available additional overall United States assistance levels as appropriate; (3) enhancing and expanding debt relief as appropriate; (4) mobilizing and leveraging the participation of businesses and public-private partnerships; (5) coordinating the goal of poverty reduction with other internationally recognized Millennium Development Goals; and (6) integrating principles of sustainable development and entrepreneurship into policies and programs.

Sets forth specified reporting requirements. Directs the Secretary of State to designate a coordinator who will have primary responsibility for overseeing and drafting the reports, as well as responsibility for helping to implement recommendations contained in the reports.

https://www.congress.gov/bill/110th-congress/senate-bill/2433

If only people had done a little research on Obama -- they wouldn't have voted for him -- but like Vivek he was/is a slick talker.

[libertybele]

Also, and I've brought these issues up before -- Obama signed a small arms treaty with the U.N. without the consent of Congress -- basically gun confiscation with the help of the U.N. He also wanted to put a U.N. hub in DC.  Whether or not Congress was able to rescind the treaty that he signed I am not so confident. 

I know that there are some in here that don't believe that the U.N. has troops waiting in the wings to help take us over once our Republic falls, but that's been the rumor for quite some time.

The U.N. has NO right to grab power over the U.S.???  If true, then what would forbid them from using 'emergency powers' in the U.S., especially with Biden and company in charge??

[Weird Tolkienish Figure]

It'll be just as binding and enforceable as is any other U.N. proclamation, which is "not at all".

Exactly. There's no enforcement... force. All power comes from the point of a gun ultimately.