The motivation for and charges themselves are illegitimate -----
Those are two different things. I agree the motivation is political. But whether the charges themselves are illegitimate/legally flawed won't be known until we know a lot more about the evidence. I wouldn't be shocked to find out that Trump was dumb enough to commit a process crime. As in -- I don't think he should have been prosecuted for having classified documents.
However, if he was dumb enough to suborn perjury, or to be complicit in making false statements to a court, then he absolutely should not have done that and may be in trouble. But there isn't enough evidence public yet to know that one way or the other.
how can you promote that it is now up to the same corrupt government that brought them to prove them as though this is the reasonable outcome?
Well, of
course it is up to the government to prove them. Unless you believe it is Trump's job to prove his innocence...? As I've said, I think the most reasonable outcome would have been to not have brought these charges at all,
even if Trump was technically guilty of a crime, but that ship has sailed. So the question now is whether or not the charges can be proven. That's not a value judgment, but a simple statement of legal fact.
Do you see no path to righting this legal ship?
I'm not sure what you mean by "righting this legal ship". There's not going to be some mass uprising that magically causes the charges to vanish. This thing is going to be heard in court.
There are some things the judge might do, like dismiss charges because of prosecutorial misconduct, etc., that would more or less undo this if the dismissal survived appeal. But again, we need to see more of the evidence to know whether or not there are grounds for that.