BREAKING: Biden DOJ notifies President Trump that he will be indicted next week

[Weird Tolkienish Figure]

I hope Trump makes them come and get him.

[Right_in_Virginia]

:
If the charges are meritless and just "Trumped up"

How can a rational adult include the qualifier "if" after living through the past seven years? 

[Right_in_Virginia]

Well...the only Republican Administration since all that stuff happened was Trump's.  If the DOJ didn't get cleaned out, or wrongdoers weren't prosecuted...he's the guy most responsible for that.

It's really frightening that there are those who walk among us masquerading as "constitutional conservatives" blaming the target for not having the legal or political right to fire those across all federal agencies and Congress who are investigating him ---- and to do so dripping with such moral superiority.

Please, beware of their 

[mystery-ak]

Square profile picture
FOX News Radio
@foxnewsradio
·
3m
Kim Strassel On Classified Docs Case: It Won’t Resonate With Americans If Trump Gets Indicted & Biden Doesn’t

[mystery-ak]

This was just sent to me..

First 1/3 - 1/2 of this video is worth the watch. He goes through and very clearly explains why the upcoming indictments of Trump is serious and likely to get traction.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AA273kfglIo&ab_channel=JudgeNapolitano-JudgingFreedom

[mystery-ak]

Bernard B. Kerik
@BernardKerik
·
1h
If Donald Trump is indicted by DOJ, every single Republican vying to be the president, better be behind him or they should just drop out of the race and save their money.

[bigheadfred]

This was just sent to me..

First 1/3 - 1/2 of this video is worth the watch. He goes through and very clearly explains why the upcoming indictments of Trump is serious and likely to get traction.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AA273kfglIo&ab_channel=JudgeNapolitano-JudgingFreedom

That does sound bad for Trump.

[libertybele]

Anyone think that the leftists/globalists/marxists aren't going to keep Trump from running, regardless of what they have to do to him is dreaming.

They are after him, they've been after him and their corruption is so deep that I just don't see how he's going to escape charges.  Witch hunt or no witch hunt, right or wrong, they aren't going to stop. 

Trump has money to fight them now, but his past lawyers and defense team have been less than adequate.  At best the leftists are going to try to exhaust most of his money and keep him tied up in court.

Prayers up for President Trump and may God have mercy on this country.

[Maj. Bill Martin]

Anyone think that the leftists/globalists/marxists aren't going to keep Trump from running, regardless of what they have to do to him is dreaming.

They are after him, they've been after him and their corruption is so deep that I just don't see how he's going to escape charges.  Witch hunt or no witch hunt, right or wrong, they aren't going to stop. 

Trump has money to fight them now, but his past lawyers and defense team have been less than adequate.  At best the leftists are going to try to exhaust most of his money and keep him tied up in court.

Prayers up for President Trump and may God have mercy on this country.

He's got plenty of money to fight these charges.  If he can't hire good lawyers, that's on him.

[libertybele]

He's got plenty of money to fight these charges.  If he can't hire good lawyers, that's on him.

No he doesn't hire good lawyers.  Giuliani was a nightmare for him, just as one example.

[Wingnut]

He's got plenty of money to fight these charges.  If he can't hire good lawyers, that's on him.

Trump being the grifter he is will put the arm on his donors to foot his legal bills.

[Hoodat]

BREAKING: Biden DOJ notifies President Trump that he will be indicted next week.

Indicted for what?  What crime are they charging him with?

[Hoodat]

It's really frightening that there are those who walk among us masquerading as "constitutional conservatives" blaming the target for not having the legal or political right to fire those across all federal agencies and Congress who are investigating him ---- and to do so dripping with such moral superiority.

It is really pathetic that there are those who walk among us who not only intentionally ignore the fact that Constitutional Conservatives have defended Trump at every turn against the tyranny of those who have thwarted the very foundations of our Constitution for the sole purpose of political gain, but who also continuously reiterate false narratives against them.

[DB]

That does sound bad for Trump.

Yes, it does. Trump's mouth was his undoing.

[DB]

Indicted for what?  What crime are they charging him with?

The posted video above: https://www.gopbriefingroom.com/index.php/topic,502029.msg2845267.html#msg2845267

Spells it out pretty clearly. It sounds like Trump blew himself up breaking his attorney client privilege.

[Hoodat]

The posted video above: https://www.gopbriefingroom.com/index.php/topic,502029.msg2845267.html#msg2845267

Spells it out pretty clearly. It sounds like Trump blew himself up breaking his attorney client privilege.

That is a very tall stretch.  If I am following it correctly, he told someone on tape back in July 2021 that he had a top secret document.  But later, he told his lawyers that there were no more classified documents in his possession.  Not seeing a problem here.  In order to compel his lawyers to testify, one would have to prove first of all that Trump was telling the truth in 2021 which is going to be quite a feat for any prosecutor insisting that Trump is a liar.  And secondly, one must prove that the referenced document was still in his possession after he informed his lawyers that no more classified documents were in his possession.

Keep in mind that Trump already acknowledged to the National Archives that he did in fact have classified documents at the Mar-A-Lago residence, which is why he had to get the special locks and store room.  So there is nothing here that would force his lawyers to testify against him.

And of course that still doesn't answer the question.  What crime is he being indicted for?

[MeshugeMikey]

Feds inform Trump he is target likely to be indicted 

     

Federal prosecutors have notified Donald Trump that he is a criminal target and likely to be indicted imminently in a probe into alleged classified documents – even as the Justice Department declined to delay charges to give time to investigate allegations of witness tampering submitted by the former president’s legal team, according to multiple people on Wednesday familiar with the case.

https://justthenews.com/politics-policy/all-things-trump/feds-inform-trump-he-target-likely-be-indicted-doj-rebuffs

[DB]

That is a very tall stretch.  If I am following it correctly, he told someone on tape back in July 2021 that he had a top secret document.  But later, he told his lawyers that there were no more classified documents in his possession.  Not seeing a problem here.  In order to compel his lawyers to testify, one would have to prove first of all that Trump was telling the truth in 2021 which is going to be quite a feat for any prosecutor insisting that Trump is a liar.  And secondly, one must prove that the referenced document was still in his possession after he informed his lawyers that no more classified documents were in his possession.

Keep in mind that Trump already acknowledged to the National Archives that he did in fact have classified documents at the Mar-A-Lago residence, which is why he had to get the special locks and store room.  So there is nothing here that would force his lawyers to testify against him.

And of course that still doesn't answer the question.  What crime is he being indicted for?

Apparently NDI documents are illegal to be in possession of outside a government secure area period. The law is different for NDI documents verses classified documents. The government was asking for it while Trump was saying he didn't have it through his lawyers. And then on tape he claimed to have it. If you lie to your lawyers putting them in legal jeopardy, attorney client privilege is lost. That's the overall claim. Obviously I'm not a lawyer...

[Idiot]

For America Firsters (Video)

https://twitter.com/MagaMemeWizard/status/1643043690565255170

So much for his 20 point lead.

[Hoodat]

Apparently NDI documents are illegal to be in possession of outside a government secure area period. The law is different for NDI documents verses classified documents. The government was asking for it while Trump was saying he didn't have it through his lawyers. And then on tape he claimed to have it. If you lie to your lawyers putting them in legal jeopardy, attorney client privilege is lost. That's the overall claim. Obviously I'm not a lawyer...

There's a problem with that timeline.  It wasn't until later that year that Trump's lawyers responded to the original National Archives request, and in that response, they admitted that Trump had some of the documents they were receiving.  Thus there is no contradiction between the July 2021 taped conversation and what his lawyers told the National Archives after the Mar-A-Lago raid.

So now we're back to the original 'charge' that Trump had classified documents in his possession at his Mar-A-Lago residence - documents delivered to his residence by the GSA.  Trump's counsel admitted this circumstance to the National Archives.  The National Archives sent their representatives to Mar-A-Lago to catalog those records.  They instructed Trump and his Secret Service detail to safeguard the room they were stored in with an extra layer of security (which they did).  So can they charge him with possessing classified documents outside of the White House?  Sure, they could have done that two years ago, just as with Biden, Pence, etc.  But that would place focus on Biden who is far more guilty of it than Trump.

[Sighlass]

Yes, it does. Trump's mouth was his undoing.

Yep !

[DB]

There's a problem with that timeline.  It wasn't until later that year that Trump's lawyers responded to the original National Archives request, and in that response, they admitted that Trump had some of the documents they were receiving.  Thus there is no contradiction between the July 2021 taped conversation and what his lawyers told the National Archives after the Mar-A-Lago raid.

So now we're back to the original 'charge' that Trump had classified documents in his possession at his Mar-A-Lago residence - documents delivered to his residence by the GSA.  Trump's counsel admitted this circumstance to the National Archives.  The National Archives sent their representatives to Mar-A-Lago to catalog those records.  They instructed Trump and his Secret Service detail to safeguard the room they were stored in with an extra layer of security (which they did).  So can they charge him with possessing classified documents outside of the White House?  Sure, they could have done that two years ago, just as with Biden, Pence, etc.  But that would place focus on Biden who is far more guilty of it than Trump.

The NDI documents may have nothing to do with the National Archives.

[Hoodat]

The NDI documents may have nothing to do with the National Archives.

Yeah, I get that.  It is completely unrelated to this latest legal pole vault attempt.  But it will be difficult for the Biden regime to go after Trump on NDI when Biden is guilty of far worse infractions.

[Hoodat]

This may be the basis of this latest attack angle:

Mark Meadows Flips On Trump, Agrees To Plead Guilty To Federal Charges In Exchange For Immunity Deal: Report

David Hawkins  |  June 7, 2023  |  4:47 pm

Former President Donald Trump’s ex-Chief of Staff Mark Meadows has reportedly flipped on his old boss and will take a plea deal with the Department of Justice in exchange for immunity.

Prosecutors are ready to ask grand jurors to approve an indictment against Trump for violating US criminal code known as Section 793, which prohibits “gathering, transmitting or losing” any “information respecting the national defense.” They will reportedly ask grand jurors to vote on Trump’s indictment tomorrow.

The report goes on to say the use of Section 793 is a possible end around for the Feds to try to kneecap Trump’s obvious defense that he used his authority as president to declassify the documents he removed from the White House. If so Trump will take this to SCOTUS.

That section states that anyone who “lawfully having possession of, access to, control over, or being entrusted with any document relating to the national defence, and willfully communicates, delivers, transmits or causes to be communicated, delivered, or transmitted or attempts to communicate, deliver, transmit or cause to be communicated, delivered or transmitted the same to any person not entitled to receive it, or willfully retains the same and fails to deliver it on demand to the officer or employee of the United States entitled to receive it can be punished by as many as ten years in prison.”  .  .  .

https://slaynews.com/news/mark-meadows-flips-on-trump-agrees-to-plead-guilty-to-federal-charges-in-exchange-for-immunity-deal-report/


Knowing the abysmal track record of the FBI involving people who have pled guilty in the Jan 6 false flag operation, it would shock the heck out of me if Mark Meadows chose to cut a deal with these scumbags.  I don't believe this story for a second.  But if it were true, it would have led to the Trump indictment story.  Another fake news fakeout.

[DB]

We should know soon.