Author Topic: NYC lawyer admits he used ChatGPT to file ‘bogus’ court documents  (Read 434 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Kamaji

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 57,903
NYC lawyer admits he used ChatGPT to file ‘bogus’ court documents

By Jesse O’Neill
May 30, 2023

A lawyer at a respected Tribeca firm admitted citing several “bogus” lawsuits he claimed bolstered his case — because he used an artificial intelligence chatbot to help write the Manhattan federal court filing.

The shocking admission from Steven Schwartz, an attorney with firm Levidow, Levidow & Oberman, came after he asked ChatGPT to find cases relevant to his client’s lawsuit — only for the bot to fabricate them entirely, court documents show.

The snafu began after Schwartz’s legal partner Paul LoDuca filed a lawsuit against the Colombian airline Avianca on behalf of Robert Mata, who was allegedly injured when a metal serving cart struck his knee on a flight to New York City.

When the airline’s lawyers asked the court to toss the suit, Schwartz filed a brief that supposedly cited more than a half dozen relevant cases.

There was just one problem: the cases — such as Miller v. United Airlines, Petersen v. Iran Air and Varghese v. China Southern Airlines — were completely made up by ChatGPT.

*  *  *

Source:  https://nypost.com/2023/05/30/steven-schwartz-admits-he-used-chatgpt-to-file-bogus-court-doc/

Offline DB

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13,213
I wonder if this journalist knows what "snafu" means?

Offline The_Reader_David

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2,299
Which suggests a guard-rail for text-based AI:  all assertions of fact made by an AI program must be accompanied by what used to be called "textual apparatus":  footnotes (or endnotes) and a bibliography of sources.
And when they behead your own people in the wars which are to come, then you will know what this was all about.

Offline Smokin Joe

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 56,678
  • I was a "conspiracy theorist". Now I'm just right.
Which suggests a guard-rail for text-based AI:  all assertions of fact made by an AI program must be accompanied by what used to be called "textual apparatus":  footnotes (or endnotes) and a bibliography of sources.
The AI will just make them up, too....
How God must weep at humans' folly! Stand fast! God knows what he is doing!
Seventeen Techniques for Truth Suppression

Of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end for they do so with the approval of their own conscience.

C S Lewis

Offline The_Reader_David

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2,299
The AI will just make them up, too....

No, that's the point.  The programming and training of the AI has to be designed so that only actual sources can be cited.
And when they behead your own people in the wars which are to come, then you will know what this was all about.

Offline Kamaji

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 57,903
No, that's the point.  The programming and training of the AI has to be designed so that only actual sources can be cited.

Connect an AI with Wests and Shepards, and one just might put a bunch of first year associates to shame.

Offline DefiantMassRINO

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10,154
  • Gender: Male
Back in the day, our legal department used Westlaw CD's to do legal digging before the Interwebs caught on.  That's back when CD drives used CD caddies.
Self-Anointed Deplorable Expert Chowderhead Pundit

I reserve my God-given rights to be wrong and to be stupid at all times.
"If at first you don’t succeed, destroy all evidence that you tried." - Steven Wright