She is fully representative of her candidate.
How to you reconcile a lot of these same people having backed Trump in 2016?? Why was it okay for Trump to take all that money, but not DeSantis?
Here's the reality -- most of that kind of PAC spending isn't done because they want to "own" the candidate. It's done because the the people who finance those PACs
already agree with the stances that candidate holds, and want them to be President. After all, there are plenty of candidates from which they could choose, and they pick the one they like the most. Nothing wrong with that. Usually, there are multiple such PAC's supporting contending candidates, and it would be impossible for a candidate to pander to them all anyway.
I had to raise money once for a political issue -- it was Right to Work in my state. So what you do is you identify people who you agree with you on that issue alread. You then go to them, tell them the cause you're pushing, and ask if they'll support it. Contributions -- at least for issues and people seeking an office -- come from contributors already aligned with the candidate. Because after all, those PACs have no hold over the candidate once they are in office. A PAC supporting DeSantis has no recourse if he gets in office and doesn't do what they asked. So they only way it works is for them to find candidates in who they actually believe. "Buying" and "owning" the candidate doesn't work because they can do whatever they wish after they are in office.
The real corruption generally doesn't come in until you're talking about contributions made to
incumbents. Because that's when lobbyists can wait to see how you vote on an issue
before making the contribution.