Kerry Says US Farm Confiscations Not Off the Table

[Hoodat]

No, but the Supreme Court does, and it still is the most respected branch of government.

There are only four Supreme Court Justices we can count on to uphold the Constitution.  The fact that cases like Kelo, Obergefell, and Rowe either stand now or stood for so long proves that the Supreme Court doesn't really respect the Constitution.

[Wingnut]

Too bad the Viet Cong didn't do us a bigger one.

 

[mountaineer]

A response to the J. Effin' Kerrys of the world:

J Kerner
@JKernerOT
Croatian MEP, Mislav Kolakušić, tells the EU Parliament:

“Today we are discussing the role of you farmers in the green transition. Your role is extremely simple: You have to disappear.

“Why? Because you are interfering with the new, insane ideology of complete control over the population of the European Union, for which—in the near future—the only food will be artificially created food supplemented with imported insects from the East.

“Only the rich will be able to buy and eat normal organic food.

“The war against the farmers started in the Netherlands. There, by legal norms. They want to take away the land from the farmers and hand it over to the construction sector, because allegedly farming is dangerous for the land and the population.

“They are fighting and the farmers in Croatia and other EU countries will not give up either.”
7:31 PM · May 20, 2023

[jafo2010]

I disagree.  The Supreme Court has proven completely political with their ambivalence with the 2020 election.  People can deny that the election was fixed all they want, but for those of us familiar with what goes on with elections, the cheating was overt and blatant.

When you back off poll watchers 100 yards from the activity, and then mount poster board to eliminate ANY OBSERVATION, it is a complete violation of election law, and there is only one reason for this.  CHEATING!   CHEATING!!   CHEATING!!!

All the stops were pulled to push Trump from the national stage.  He has a zero chance to get elected in 2024.  They will be more blatant with their cheating, and no one will lift a finger to address it.

Back to Kerry, he is a political whore, has zero integrity, and his involvement is a positive indicator that corruption is at its maximum level!

[Kamaji]

I disagree.  The Supreme Court has proven completely political with their ambivalence with the 2020 election.  People can deny that the election was fixed all they want, but for those of us familiar with what goes on with elections, the cheating was overt and blatant.

When you back off poll watchers 100 yards from the activity, and then mount poster board to eliminate ANY OBSERVATION, it is a complete violation of election law, and there is only one reason for this.  CHEATING!   CHEATING!!   CHEATING!!!

All the stops were pulled to push Trump from the national stage.  He has a zero chance to get elected in 2024.  They will be more blatant with their cheating, and no one will lift a finger to address it.

Back to Kerry, he is a political whore, has zero integrity, and his involvement is a positive indicator that corruption is at its maximum level!

The Supreme Court wasn't given enough evidence to justify its taking the step of interfering in the 2020 election.  And I say that notwithstanding that I believe there was enough misconduct involved that it could in fact have altered the results of the 2020 election.

The Supreme Court has to be very careful with the disputes it gets involved in, particularly where the disputes are avowedly political.  That is one of the things that is noted about Marbury v. Madison - although the case is cited for the proposition that the Supreme Court has the final say over what the law is, it accomplished that result while still holding that the Court did not have the authority to reach the result that the plaintiff wanted - that he was entitled to a particular commission as a federal officer.

If anyone is concerned about the chances that the democrats will finally give themselves enough dutch courage to try and actually pack the Supreme Court right now, given the current partisan atmosphere, if the Supreme Court had intervened in the 2020 election without having absolutely irrefutable evidence that the 2020 election was completely altered by provably illegal conduct, then we would be looking at a packed, wholly liberal Court right now instead of a Court that has a 6-3 conservative majority.

[jafo2010]

Irrefutable evidence?  I guess you are as blind as they are.  Video is plentiful showing the mass cheating that took place.  Plenty of evidence.

You just can't admit the truth.  The court system in the USA is completely corrupt.  I have zero respect for anyone with a law degree.  All f***ing liars, every last one.  Portend to be holders of truth...BIG F***ING LIE!!!!!!!

[berdie]

If there is confiscation of property or more regulation of the industry I can forsee an uprising...that would be aided by people that can't get food. I can see that same event happening if there is confiscation of 401ks and IRAs.

Most people won't lift a hand at the root causes that the government is imposing....but if they are personally affected, that's a different story.

[corbe]

It is a crying shame john wasn't fragged back in nam.

   @sneakypete would have Shirley fragged him, unless he was dying his hair orange back then.

[Smokin Joe]

If there is confiscation of property or more regulation of the industry I can forsee an uprising...that would be aided by people that can't get food. I can see that same event happening if there is confiscation of 401ks and IRAs.

Most people won't lift a hand at the root causes that the government is imposing....but if they are personally affected, that's a different story.

Imagine Bundy Ranch on steroids. The productive know what's at stake, even if the sheep don't.

[Wingnut]

   @sneakypete would have Shirley fragged him, unless he was dying his hair orange back then.

 

[libertybele]

Imagine Bundy Ranch on steroids. The productive know what's at stake, even if the sheep don't.

I can certainly see that as a likely scenario.

[sneakypete]

J. Effin' Kerry is an effin' idiot. I only can surmise that he, like the rest of the left, is in favor of vast multitudes of people dying of starvation in the name of climate change. This makes him not only an idiot but pure evil.

@mountaineer

Well,he may not be the sharpest knife in the drawer,but he IS smart enough to realize that no matter what happens,
as a member in Good (?) standing of the Billionaire Boys Club,neither he nor anyone in his family will have to suffer.

Suffering is for peons.

[sneakypete]

Come and try taking it, Lurch.

F***ing democrats.

@ScottinVA

Do NOT forget their accomplices in the alleged Republican Party.

[sneakypete]

So were  does Jacque think food comes from?

@LMAO

Food comes from servants. Everybody knows that. Don't believe me,ask Kerry.