Author Topic: E. Jean Carroll and Her Attorney Make Stunning Claim About Law That Enabled Her to Go After Trump  (Read 530 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Online mystery-ak

  • Owner
  • Administrator
  • ******
  • Posts: 383,236
  • Gender: Female
  • Let's Go Brandon!
E. Jean Carroll and Her Attorney Make Stunning Claim About Law That Enabled Her to Go After Trump
By Nick Arama | 3:00 PM on May 11, 2023

As we reported on Tuesday, former President Donald Trump was found liable for sexual abuse and defamation in the civil case of E. Jean Carroll, but the jury rejected her claim of rape.

Carroll has made a lot of bizarre comments over the years and there were a lot of problems with the case, to say the least. But the only reason they were able to bring a sexual assault claim was because of a new law that was passed in New York in 2022 called the Adult Survivors Act. That Act, signed by Democrat NY Gov. Kathy Hochul allowed for a “one-year lookback window for survivors of sexual assault” to sue their alleged abuser “regardless of when the abuse occurred.”

Now, E. Jean Carroll’s attorney, Roberta Kaplan, is making a bit of a bombshell claim. She admitted that Carroll was involved in helping get that law passed.

https://twitter.com/CollinRugg/status/1656344259556184067/history

more
https://redstate.com/nick-arama/2023/05/11/e-jean-carroll-and-her-attorney-make-stunning-claim-about-law-that-enabled-her-to-go-after-trump-n744368
Proud Supporter of Tunnel to Towers
Support the USO
Democrat Party...the Party of Infanticide

“Therefore do not worry about tomorrow, for tomorrow will worry about itself. Each day has enough trouble of its own.”
-Matthew 6:34

Offline Kamaji

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 57,933
It may appear unseemly, and perhaps should have been entered into the case as evidence - assuming there was a basis for relevance - but there is nothing inherently wrong with lengthening, or even removing altogether, a statute of limitations.


Offline kevindavis007

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12,414
  • Gender: Male
It may appear unseemly, and perhaps should have been entered into the case as evidence - assuming there was a basis for relevance - but there is nothing inherently wrong with lengthening, or even removing altogether, a statute of limitations.


It appears so, having said that, this is why that Character matters.  If this was Bill Clinton we would be screaming from the rooftops on why character matters.
Join The Reagan Caucus: https://reagancaucus.org/

Offline Kamaji

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 57,933

It appears so, having said that, this is why that Character matters.  If this was Bill Clinton we would be screaming from the rooftops on why character matters.

Yes.