Author Topic: FDIC Recommends Overhauling US Bank Insurance (Suggests "targeted" coverage)  (Read 326 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline mountaineer

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 78,762
FDIC Recommends Overhauling US Bank Insurance
Monday, 01 May 2023 02:43 PM EDT

The Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. is recommending the U.S. rethink its decades-old policy of insuring up to $250,000 in bank deposits and replace it with an overhaul that would allow regulators to cover higher amounts on a “targeted” basis.

The proposed change appears to openly acknowledge that the FDIC is looking for ways to calm both depositors and markets as the organization contends with the third U.S. bank failure this year. First Republic Bank became the second largest failure in history Monday when regulators seized it and JP Morgan Chase stepped up as a buyer.  ...

AP via Newsmax

Support Israel's emergency medical service. afmda.org

Offline Kamaji

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 57,903
FDIC Recommends Overhauling US Bank Insurance
Monday, 01 May 2023 02:43 PM EDT

The Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. is recommending the U.S. rethink its decades-old policy of insuring up to $250,000 in bank deposits and replace it with an overhaul that would allow regulators to cover higher amounts on a “targeted” basis.

The proposed change appears to openly acknowledge that the FDIC is looking for ways to calm both depositors and markets as the organization contends with the third U.S. bank failure this year. First Republic Bank became the second largest failure in history Monday when regulators seized it and JP Morgan Chase stepped up as a buyer.  ...

AP via Newsmax



Bad idea.  Basic deposit insurance should be a set maximum.  If a particular depositor wants his/her/its deposits insured above that amount, then they should be purchasing private insurance of their own.

Offline catfish1957

  • Laken Riley.... Say her Name. And to every past and future democrat voter- Her blood is on your hands too!!!
  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 31,461
  • Gender: Male
Bad idea.  Basic deposit insurance should be a set maximum.  If a particular depositor wants his/her/its deposits insured above that amount, then they should be purchasing private insurance of their own.

If someone is stupid enough to leave more than $250K per depositer ($500K as joint account), in any bank, they really don't deserve subsidized insurance.
I display the Confederate Battle Flag in honor of my great great great grandfathers who spilled blood at Wilson's Creek and Shiloh.  5 others served in the WBTS with honor too.

Offline Kamaji

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 57,903
If someone is stupid enough to leave more than $250K per depositer ($500K as joint account), in any bank, they really don't deserve subsidized insurance.

Exactly.