Author Topic: Illinois Supreme Court justices refuse recusal in gun ban challenge despite funding from defendants  (Read 929 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Free Vulcan

  • Technical
  • *****
  • Posts: 23,746
  • Gender: Male
  • Ah, the air is so much fresher here...
The Illinois Supreme Court has denied a motion to disqualify two justices from hearing a challenge to the state's new gun ban over perceived conflicts of interest. The two justices also declined to recuse themselves.

Before Elizabeth Rochford and Mary O’Brien were elected to the Illinois Supreme Court in November 2022, Gov. J.B. Pritzker gave each of their campaign funds half a million dollars from both his campaign account and a revocable trust, totaling $1 million to each. The two justices also received six-figure donations out of a campaign fund controlled by Illinois House Speaker Emanual “Chris” Welch,” D-Hillside.

Both Pritzker and Welch are top defendants in a Macon County challenge of Illinois’ gun and magazine ban brought by state Rep. Dan Caulkins, R-Decatur. The county judge there issued a final judgment that the law is unconstitutional. The state appealed the case directly to the Illinois Supreme Court after a separate case was found by the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals to have a likelihood of success on the basis the law violates equal protections.

Late last month, Caulkins’ attorney filed a motion for the two justices to recuse themselves, or for the Illinois Supreme Court to disqualify them from hearing the challenge. Attorney Jerry Stocks argued “unreasonably large campaign contributions” from Pritzker and Welch “undermine public confidence” in the judiciary.

https://justthenews.com/nation/states/center-square/illinois-supreme-court-justices-deny-motion-recusal-gun-ban-challenge
The Republic is lost.

Offline Fishrrman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 35,548
  • Gender: Male
  • Dumbest member of the forum
The courts (at all levels) are no longer required to shun political partisanship.
Indeed, in the leftist states in particular they have become political tools.

Once this occurs, there's probably no "going back"...