Spike Protein Accumulates in the Brain and Causes Infarcts, Bleeds, Inflammation

[Elderberry]

The Post & Email by Dr. William Makis 4/7/2023

Spike Protein Accumulates in the Brain and Causes Infarcts, Bleeds, Inflammation – Pfizer & Moderna COVID-19 mRNA Vaccines Cause Severe Neurological Injuries

A new paper from Germany posted on April 5, 2023 proves that the spike protein accumulates in the brain and causes death of brain cells (which would certainly explain a great deal of what we see around us). (click here)

Key findings:

“Our results revealed the accumulation of the spike protein in the skull marrow, brain meninges, and brain parenchyma.”

“The injection of the spike protein alone caused cell death in the brain, highlighting a direct effect on brain tissue.”

“we observed the presence of spike protein in the skull of deceased long after their COVID-19 infection, suggesting that the spike’s persistence may contribute to long-term neurological symptoms”

Spike protein damage:

Out of all COVID-19 viral proteins, only the spike protein was detected in brain parenchyma.

“suggesting that the spike protein could have a long lifetime in the body. This notion is supported by the observation that spike protein can be detected on patient immune cells more than a year after the infection – a recent preprint suggests spike protein’s persistence in plasma samples up to 12 months post-diagnosis”

“injection of spike protein induced a broad spectrum of proteome changes in the skull marrow, meninges, and brain, including proteins related to coronavirus disease, complement and coagulation cascades, neutrophil degranulation, NETs formation, and PI3K-AKT signaling pathway, demonstrating the immunogenicity of SARS-CoV-2 spike protein in the absence of other viral components.”

Brain inflammation

“Our molecular analysis suggests activation of immune response in the skull-meninges-brain axis, potentially via recruiting and increasing the activity of neutrophils similar to what has been reported in the respiratory tract”

“in the skull marrow…viral proteins act as an inflammatory stimulus that leads to the development of a significant immune response in the brain”

“In the meninges, a significant consequence of the inflammatory state is an upregulation of proteins involved in neutrophil degranulation”

More: https://www.thepostemail.com/2023/04/07/spike-protein-accumulates-in-the-brain-and-causes-infarcts-bleeds-inflammation-pfizer-moderna-covid-19-mrna-vaccines-cause-severe-neurological-injuries/

[jmyrlefuller]

Well, it's a little too late to stop that now, isn't it?

[libertybele]

What is most disturbing is  the WHO, CDC and our government were so insistent on vaccinating our youth. They will be the ones who will be affected by all of the side effects at an early age.
 

[Hoodat]

I'm just waiting to hear this announcement blasted across every media outlet:

"CONSERVATIVES WERE RIGHT ALL ALONG !!!"

[jmyrlefuller]

What is most disturbing is  the WHO, CDC and our government were so insistent on vaccinating our youth. They will be the ones who will be affected by all of the side effects at an early age.

As opposed to the alternatives?

1, let the virus spread uninhibited, which means the spike protein affects everyone anyway.

Or,

2. Mass lockdowns in an attempt to stop the spread, never letting up until every case is gone. As it eventually spread to animals, this would have failed and led us back to 1 anyway.

[libertybele]

As opposed to the alternatives?

1, let the virus spread uninhibited, which means the spike protein affects everyone anyway.

Or,

2. Mass lockdowns in an attempt to stop the spread, never letting up until every case is gone. As it eventually spread to animals, this would have failed and led us back to 1 anyway.

There are those who never became ill with COVID and never received the vaccine.

The vaccines did more harm than good. The vaccines did not prevent the virus from spreading; they only reduced transmission by a small percentage. People who received the vaccine still came did with COVID and still transmitted the disease.

Herd immunity would have been more effective??

[Kamaji]

As opposed to the alternatives?

1, let the virus spread uninhibited, which means the spike protein affects everyone anyway.

Or,

2. Mass lockdowns in an attempt to stop the spread, never letting up until every case is gone. As it eventually spread to animals, this would have failed and led us back to 1 anyway.

Not so.  The difference between the spike protein on a live virus and the spike protein produced by the "vaccines" was that in the second case the spike protein is not attached to a larger viral particle, and thus is capable of doing more damage than the spike protein when attached to a full viral particle.

[Smokin Joe]

Not so.  The difference between the spike protein on a live virus and the spike protein produced by the "vaccines" was that in the second case the spike protein is not attached to a larger viral particle, and thus is capable of doing more damage than the spike protein when attached to a full viral particle.

That, and having the virus doesn't cause the body to make spike proteins. Instead it makes antibodies to the virus itself.