The Post & Email by Joseph DeMaio 4/5/2023
Now that Manhattan Banana Republic District Attorney Alvin (“No Neck”) Bragg has made good on his campaign pledge to arrest President Trump as a private citizen (for the time being), the full, 3-D impaired malevolence of his psyche emerges. By leveraging various misdemeanor acts of “falsifying business records” into 34 felony counts under New York law, he has with a blundering indictment succeeded only in violating a blindfolded Lady Justice, then casting her to the side of the road like a used trollop after having “had his way with her.” Strong words? Perhaps, but actually understated and sanitized for P&E readers.
To begin with, as noted here, Bragg’s abuse of power and politicization – not to mention misunderstanding – of the criminal code of New York in order to “get” President Trump after he left office in 2021 – a campaign promise he made to the imbeciles who voted the Soros-funded prosecutor into office…, recalling, of course, that 90% of registered voters in Manhattan are Democrats – brings to mind the adolescent Q & A. Q: Why does a dog lick itself? A: Because it can. It is what Soros-backed Democrat prosecutors do. To quote Brandon: “Not joking…, not hyperbole.”
And as for the judge overseeing the spectacle – Judge Juan Manuel Merchan – it would appear that he has some major conflict of interest issues facing him. But fear not, faithful P&E readers: apparently the Banana Republic of Manhattan does not recognize the Rules of Judicial Ethics promulgated by the State Bar of New York, because if reality were otherwise, Judge Merchan – after boning up (or for the first time scanning) the New York Canons of Judicial Ethics – should have recused himself long ago.
Specifically, by continuing to preside over Bragg’s idiotic but dangerous pogrom targeting President Trump, Merchan has ignored:
Canon 1: “A judge shall uphold the integrity and independence of the judiciary.” (Emphasis added) Commenting on that Canon, the New York State Bar observes: “[V]iolation of this Code [of Judicial Ethics] diminishes public confidence in the judiciary and thereby does injury to the system of government under law.” (Emphasis added)
Canon 2: A Judge should avoid impropriety and the appearance of impropriety in all of the Judge’s activities.” (Emphasis added). Commenting on that Canon, the New York State Bar notes: “A judge shall not allow family, social, political or other relationships to influence the judge’s judicial conduct or judgment… [and] [t]he test for appearance of impropriety is whether the conduct would create in reasonable minds a perception that the judge’s ability to carry out judicial responsibilities with integrity, impartiality and competence is impaired.” (Emphasis added)
Canon 3: “A Judge shall perform the duties of judicial office impartially and diligently.” The New York State Bar’s comment on that canon specifies: “Disqualification. (1) A judge shall disqualify himself or herself in a proceeding in which the judge’s impartiality … might reasonably be questioned, including but not limited to instances where … the judge has a personal bias or prejudice concerning a party.” (Emphasis added)
More:
https://www.thepostemail.com/2023/04/05/the-banana-yellow-indictment-of-president-trump/
