While former presidents might not be above the law, their status limits punishment to house arrest
By David Zukerman
Prior to events forcing The New York Times to report that the Trump indictment will not occur on Wednesday, March 22, after all, Times propagandists William K. Rashbaum and Jonah E. Bromwich reported, almost with glee, "How an Indictment and Arrest of Donald Trump Could Unfold". (Print title this hopeful slice of anti-Trump agitprop: "What Could Come Next After Grand Jury Votes.")
The article set forth seven questions concerning timing of the indictment, charges, arrest and so forth. For present purposes, herewith are two of the questions set forth for discussion by Rashbaum and Bromwich, which should have caused them to analyze the immensities of the subject matter, but, as they are mere anti-Trump propagandists, did not.
Their fifth question was: "How do you arrest a former president?" They began their answer with reference to arrest routine: photographed, finger-printed, Miranda-ized. They then explained, "But because of Mr. Trump's status as a former president -- and his round-the-clock Secret Service detail -- prosecutors are likely to make some accommodations. He could be held in n interview room instead of a cell; the investigators who process his arrest may forgo handcuffs...."
more
https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2023/03/while_former_presidents_might_not_be_above_the_law_their_status_limits_punishment_to_house_arrest.html
