Author Topic: Federal Judge Blocks California Handgun Restrictions  (Read 384 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Online Elderberry

  • TBR Contributor
  • *****
  • Posts: 24,280
Federal Judge Blocks California Handgun Restrictions
« on: March 21, 2023, 03:42:15 am »
The Reload by Stephen Gutowski March 20, 2023

California can’t ban residents from buying modern handguns.

That’s the ruling handed down by Federal District Judge Cormac J. Carney, a George W. Bush appointee, on Monday. He found California’s requirement that all new pistols sold in the state include a series of uncommon or even theoretical safety devices is unconstitutional. He ruled the regulation, which has resulted in no new handgun models being sold to civilians in nearly a decade, violates the Second Amendment.

“Californians have the constitutional right to acquire and use state-of-the-art handguns to protect themselves,” Judge Carney wrote in his preliminary injunction for Boland v. Bonta. “They should not be forced to settle for decade-old models of handguns to ensure that they remain safe inside or outside the home.”

The decision is the latest blow to California’s strict gun-control laws in the wake of the Supreme Court’s 2022 opinion in New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v. Bruen, which set a new standard for reviewing gun laws. Late last year, a federal judge also blocked the state’s attempt to discourage legal challenges to its restrictions. Many of the state’s other high-profile gun restrictions are similarly embroiled in ongoing litigation, and Monday’s ruling may signal they may face a tough climb to clear the bar set by the Supreme Court.

The also ruling paves the way for law-abiding Californians to access new pistol models for the first time in a long time.

California passed the Unsafe Handgun Act (UHA) in 2001. It initially barred the sale of any new pistol models that didn’t include a loaded chamber indicator or magazine disconnect safety. However, in 2013 the state expanded the requirements to include so-called microstamping technology. In theory, microstamping would enable a gun to leave identifiable marks on every spent casing with the goal of helping police solve crimes. However, there has never been a production gun in the world that has implemented the theoretical technology.

The practical effect of adding the requirement, which a handful of other states are now considering implementing as well, was a complete ban on the sale of all handgun models created after 2013. Outside of police officers, who are not subject to the handgun roster restrictions despite California deeming guns outside of it “unsafe,” Californians have been mostly limited to buying pistols first introduced to the market more than 15 years ago.

“These regulations are having a devastating impact on Californians’ ability to acquire and use new, state-of-the-art handguns,” Judge Cormac wrote. “Since 2007, when the [loaded chamber indicator] and [magazine disconnect safety] requirements were introduced, very few new handguns have been introduced for sale in California with those features. Since 2013, when the microstamping requirement was introduced, not a single new semiautomatic handgun has been approved for sale in California.”

More: https://thereload.com/federal-judge-blocks-california-handgun-restrictions/

Online Smokin Joe

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 56,400
  • I was a "conspiracy theorist". Now I'm just right.
Re: Federal Judge Blocks California Handgun Restrictions
« Reply #1 on: March 21, 2023, 05:36:12 am »
Now we need similar rulings over Class III select fire firearms, taking on the "Rireame Owners Protecction Act" 1986 law that bans civilian ownership of select fire (full auto capable) firearms made since 1986.

Surely, persons capable of passing those background checks should be able to have the latest models...

Doing this would bring the price of select fire arms down, by allowing many more on the market.
How God must weep at humans' folly! Stand fast! God knows what he is doing!
Seventeen Techniques for Truth Suppression

Of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end for they do so with the approval of their own conscience.

C S Lewis

Online Elderberry

  • TBR Contributor
  • *****
  • Posts: 24,280
Re: Federal Judge Blocks California Handgun Restrictions
« Reply #2 on: March 21, 2023, 11:10:55 pm »
Now we need similar rulings over Class III select fire firearms, taking on the "Rireame Owners Protecction Act" 1986 law that bans civilian ownership of select fire (full auto capable) firearms made since 1986.

Surely, persons capable of passing those background checks should be able to have the latest models...

Doing this would bring the price of select fire arms down, by allowing many more on the market.

Class III has always been a mess. I remember going to the gun shows back in the late 70s and Mac10s were stacked up for $200 ea, S&W 76s for $300 and Thompsons  for $600. But to purchase one in my Harris county you had to be a dealer as the sheriff wouldn't sign the forms. So our county had more class III dealers than anywhere else in the country. To become a dealer no sheriff signature was required.