General Category > Trump Legal Investigations
LIVE THREAD BREAKING...Trump Indicted
Hoodat:
--- Quote from: Maj. Bill Martin on April 11, 2023, 08:48:50 am ---I personally think the Georgia case is utter crap. Trump clearly believed personally that there was large-scale fraud in Georgia.
--- End quote ---
I'm 100% certain that there has been fraud on the GOP side in the last five Georgia elections - 2020 primary and general, 2021 runoff, and 2922 primary and general.
roamer_1:
--- Quote from: Hoodat on April 11, 2023, 02:45:10 pm ---I'm 100% certain that there has been fraud on the GOP side in the last five Georgia elections - 2020 primary and general, 2021 runoff, and 2922 primary and general.
--- End quote ---
I have followed your relentless reporting on the subject, and I will back you on that.
Even so, the only corruption that matters is the corruption you can prove in court.
There IS some use outside of that maxim - If you can convince the People, they may move the legislature(s) without the court... BUT, proof in court, I would say, is the standard.
Kamaji:
--- Quote from: Hoodat on April 11, 2023, 02:45:10 pm ---I'm 100% certain that there has been fraud on the GOP side in the last five Georgia elections - 2020 primary and general, 2021 runoff, and 2922 primary and general.
--- End quote ---
Fraud committed by the GOP, or against the GOP??
corbe:
Ronna is unavailable for comment on the former charge.
Hoodat:
--- Quote from: Kamaji on April 11, 2023, 03:29:53 pm ---Fraud committed by the GOP, or against the GOP??
--- End quote ---
By the GOP, against candidates they don't like. I had a friend who was going to run against Hank Johnson in GA-4. But because she wouldn't bow to the State GOP, they found another candidate to challenge her in the GOP primary. They even filled out all the paperwork and paid all the fees of their token candidate. Naturally, this token candidate ended up winning the GOP nomination even though he didn't campaign.
There was a lot of shady things that went down in that primary. Thousands of votes disappeared from the tally. So she challenged the election. Not as a candidate (which is very important), but as a voter. Which means that she was not challenging the results, but was challenging the integrity of the election itself. The State GOP didn't like that, so they approached her and said that if she dropped the challenge, they would declare that the tally was wrong and that she was the real winner, making her the nominee. She refused.
Not sure where that challenge is right now, but the November elections proved that the fix was in. The State GOP basically cut a deal with the Dems. The GOP kept all State offices in exchange for the US Senate seat.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version