FBI Shielded Identities Of Undercover Assets Who May Have Been Inside Capitol On Jan. 6, Whistleblow

[mystery-ak]

FBI Shielded Identities Of Undercover Assets Who May Have Been Inside Capitol On Jan. 6, Whistleblower Says


Katelynn Richardson
Contributor
March 03, 2023 2:37 PM ET
Font Size:

The FBI’s Washington Field Office (WFO) affirmed that there may have been “undercover officers” and “confidential human sources” inside the Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021, according to whistleblower testimony obtained by the Daily Caller News Foundation.

The FBI’s Washington Field Office requested the Boston Field Office open investigations into 140 individuals who took buses from Massachusetts to D.C. on Jan. 6., but denied the office’s request to see video proving those individuals were inside the Capitol, FBI whistleblower George Hill said during a Feb. 10 interview with the House Select Subcommittee on the Weaponization of the Federal Government. The office claimed they needed to “protect” the identity of possible undercover agents, according to Hill.

The Boston office initially opened cases on two individuals that “definitive evidence” showed were in restricted areas of the Capitol, Hill said. Because those individuals organized the buses to D.C., the WFO wanted cases opened on every individual on the bus.

Boston’s Supervisory Special Agent (SSA) declined to open cases on everyone who went to D.C. because they were “going to a political rally, which is First Amendment protected activity,” according to Hill.

“[People] think of the unlawful events that took place later on in the day on January 6th, but up until that time, it was a rally,” Hill said. “People were, you know, either driving to it, flying to it.”

When another SSA asked to see where they were inside the Capitol, the WFO declined to show the footage unless they knew “the exact time and place those individuals were inside the Capitol.”

more
https://dailycaller.com/2023/03/03/fbi-undercover-officers-capitol-jan-6-whistleblower/

[Smokin Joe]

What are they hiding?

Who, where, when, and especially HOW MANY of their 'assets' were involved, and HOW they were involved. Were they the primary ones inciting (and even performing) any illegal or violent acts?

If so, the entire prosecution could crumble under the penumbra of entrapment.

I have seen the video showing Ray Epps talking to someone outside the string with signs posted on it, presumably to stop the crowd from going beyond that point, just before the person he was talking to started to take down the string and signs, eliminating the notice from th view of anyone who arrived subsequently.

If that was the first 'line of defense', it was removed, and the notices with it, apparently at Ray Epps' urging. Considering he has not been prosecuted, or even arrested, and was purged from the 'Most Wanted' list promptly, it's pretty certain he is one of many assets they had at the scene, and a material contributor to the events which transpired.