Thank You. Far to many ignorant People diss the Man with out reading all of His Articles. Usually These Types are the Rino's and closet Democrats.
Almost every article has its roots in research of some kind.
I prefer to follow the trail back to the research itself.
That enabled me to see where 'journalists' were quoting conclusions without examining the studies, like those which claimed Hydroxychloroquine was no good, but didn't administer the critical zinc supplementation, seldom administered the macrolide antibiotic, and never administered the regimen at the onset of symptoms, but waited until patients were hospitalized or used study subjects in extended care facilities (likely deficient in zinc because of the 'healthy' diet that emphasizes chicken and fish over red meat). In short, the studies were designed to produce a specific result, that being that Hydroxychloroquine didn't help.
Alone, and in the later stages, results were far less spectacular than when the entire three part regimen was administered at the onset of symptoms, as would be expected with a regimen strategically targeting viral replication. But that went unmentioned.
Another 'study' in Brazil had patients taking four times the LD50 of Chloroquine, and was halted because the patients were dying. (Of course they were, they'd been poisoned). But all that hit the media was that the study had to be halted because patients were dying...not that they'd been OD'd.
