Runbeck Whistleblower Reveals That Chain Of Custody For OVER 298,942 Maricopa County Ballots Deliver

[Elderberry]

Gateway Pundit By Jordan Conradson 12/10/2022

HUGE: Runbeck Whistleblower Reveals That Chain Of Custody For OVER 298,942 Maricopa County Ballots Delivered To Runbeck On Election Day Did Not Exist, Employees Allowed To Add Family Members’ Ballots Without Any Documentation

Republican Kari Lake on Friday filed a lawsuit to nullify the 2022 midterm election results for the governor’s race in the state of Arizona.

The Gateway Pundit reported yesterday on this historic lawsuit, which claims that HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS of illegal votes were counted in the election.

Never in US history has there been so much evidence compiled of a fraudulent election taking place.

The brave attorneys representing Kari Lake are HEROES who deserve a Medal of Freedom!

“Maricopa County election officials engaged in numerous breaches of Arizona election law in their handling and custody of ballots, making it impossible to conclude that the vote tallies reported by Maricopa County accurately reflect the votes cast by Arizona voters,” contends the lawsuit.

Kari Lake’s team of expert attorneys have gathered evidence from signed witness testimony, Runbeck whistleblowers, and Maricopa County whistleblowers to craft a 70-page lawsuit against Maricopa County and Secretary of State Katie Hobbs.

Included in the complaint is a shocking claim by a Runbeck employee that nearly 300,000 ballots were delivered to Runbeck on Election Day with no chain of custody documentation.

Maricopa County is the only jurisdiction in the country that picks up completed ballots at USPS Processing Distribution Center but doesn’t bring them back to the election department or tabulation center. Instead, Maricopa County picks up mail-in ballots and takes them directly to its print vendor Runbeck Election Services, which is headquartered in Phoenix.

More: https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/12/huge-runbeck-whistleblower-reveals-chain-custody-298942-maricopa-county-ballots-delivered-runbeck-election-day-not-exist-employees-allowed-add-family-members-ballots/

[Free Vulcan]

Maricopa County is the only jurisdiction in the country that picks up completed ballots at USPS Processing Distribution Center but doesn’t bring them back to the election department or tabulation center. Instead, Maricopa County picks up mail-in ballots and takes them directly to its print vendor Runbeck Election Services, which is headquartered in Phoenix.

Which raises a zillion questions about ballot security and chain-of-custody.

[HikerGuy83]

Somebody just signed up for a whole lot of slander. 

I am grateful they came forth.....but I hope their story is water tight. 

[HikerGuy83]

Which raises a zillion questions about ballot security and chain-of-custody.

How is it that there is not some kind of mandated double check ?  Even a triple check with folks from both sides ?

No question.  No concerns. 

Squeaky clean.

[Free Vulcan]

How is it that there is not some kind of mandated double check ?  Even a triple check with folks from both sides ?

No question.  No concerns. 

Squeaky clean.

This is why I'm so glad her team focused on this. If there is anything to find, it will start here.

[catfish1957]

Which raises a zillion questions about ballot security and chain-of-custody.

When you are the Secretary of State, and you supervise these elections?  EZ Peazy cheat-a-thon.

Plus, does everyone remember the pics of Hobbs rumaging around the ballot tabulation centers two days after the election ended?  She's got gall.

No doubt this whistleblower has some credibility, but unless there is some forensic way to prove it, it will be treated like all the other 2020 shenanigans.

[catfish1957]

This country prints 70 billion unique serial numbered pieces of paper money a year.

This country can't do the same for ballots that amounts to 2 tenths of 1 % of that volume for somthing just as important?

[DB]

This country prints 70 billion unique serial numbered pieces of paper money a year.

This country can't do the same for ballots that amounts to 2 tenths of 1 % of that volume for somthing just as important?

There isn't supposed to be any way to determine how a specific voter voted. A serial number would change that.

[catfish1957]

There isn't supposed to be any way to determine how a specific voter voted. A serial number would change that.

If you perforated the ballot and seperated prior to counting you could.

Or use some kind of barcoding or implant.

Or even if you are more worried, put some kind of holgram on the ballots to prevent re-printing.

[roamer_1]

There isn't supposed to be any way to determine how a specific voter voted. A serial number would change that.

Not necessarily.

[roamer_1]

If you perforated the ballot and seperated prior to counting you could.

Or use some kind of barcoding or implant.

Or even if you are more worried, put some kind of holgram on the ballots to prevent re-printing.

CERTAINLY much can be done to authenticate the ballots. Serialization, watermarks... as you said, the very standard methods already protecting paper money.

also serialization almost automates self-auditing in electronic systems.

[Free Vulcan]

There isn't supposed to be any way to determine how a specific voter voted. A serial number would change that.

Iowa does just that. Every ballot number is associated with a voter ID.