Author Topic: Insurance company finds triple-vaxxed more likely to get COVID than unvaxxed  (Read 391 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Elderberry

  • TBR Contributor
  • *****
  • Posts: 24,630
WND 10/9/2022

Dr. Fauci meanwhile teaming with Stephen Colbert to promote booster shots

Last year, President Biden scolded the approximately 25% of Americans who decided not to get the experimental mRNA vaccine for a disease with a nearly 100% survivability rate for most people, charging they were responsible for a "pandemic of the unvaccinated."

Government data from around the world has countered the president's claim, and now the insurance giant Kaiser Permanente – which is also a health-care provider – has commissioned a study to evaluate the effectiveness of the mRNA vaccine against the dominant omicron subvariants.

Kaiser discovered that people who are triple-vaccinated not only are more likely to be infected with COVID-19, they are more likely to suffer severe illness and die from the disease, reported investigative journalist Daniel Horowitz.

A chart on page 30 of the preprint study shows vaccine efficacy against the omicron subvariants dropping significantly 14 to 30 days after a shot. The efficacy continues to fall in the following months then reaches negative territory after five months, meaning the recipient is more likely to get COVID than if he or she had not been vaccinated.

Further, the study indicates that those with three shots are at more at risk of COVID after five months than those who got two shots.

Horowitz noted the American Association of Physicians and Surgeons posted a Twitter thread with numerous recent studies that also show negative efficacy resulting from the shots.

More: https://www.wnd.com/2022/10/insurance-company-finds-triple-vaxxed-likely-get-covid-unvaxxed/

Online Hoodat

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 37,050
Makes sense since the purpose of the jab is to protect the virus against the body's immune system.
If a political party does not have its foundation in the determination to advance a cause that is right and that is moral, then it is not a political party; it is merely a conspiracy to seize power.     -Dwight Eisenhower-

"The [U.S.] Constitution is a limitation on the government, not on private individuals ... it does not prescribe the conduct of private individuals, only the conduct of the government ... it is not a charter for government power, but a charter of the citizen's protection against the government."     -Ayn Rand-

Offline jmyrlefuller

  • J. Myrle Fuller
  • Cat Mod
  • *****
  • Posts: 22,409
  • Gender: Male
  • Realistic nihilist
    • Fullervision
Makes sense since the purpose of the jab is to protect the virus against the body's immune system.
I've heard some bold accusations here, but this one is ridiculous.
New profile picture in honor of Public Domain Day 2024

Online Hoodat

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 37,050
I've heard some bold accusations here, but this one is ridiculous.

The jab causes your cells to generate spike proteins similar to the ones around the virus.  Your body then generates an immune response against those spikes which covers those spikes with a coat.  Thus the virus remains protected inside its new coat out of reach of antibodies that would attack the virus itself.  Maybe you should visit the CDC website to understand how the jab actually works.  It's all documented.
If a political party does not have its foundation in the determination to advance a cause that is right and that is moral, then it is not a political party; it is merely a conspiracy to seize power.     -Dwight Eisenhower-

"The [U.S.] Constitution is a limitation on the government, not on private individuals ... it does not prescribe the conduct of private individuals, only the conduct of the government ... it is not a charter for government power, but a charter of the citizen's protection against the government."     -Ayn Rand-