August 29, 2022
More problems emerge with the Mar-a-Lago affidavit
By Andrea Widburg
Paul Sperry is an independent journalist who pays attention to facts rather than following the mindless herd that is the mainstream media. That’s why he closely examined the Mar-a-Lago affidavit—or, at least, the parts that remained after the DOJ was done with redacting it. That examination was fruitful because Sperry discovered all sorts of problems and inconsistencies on the document’s face (what little of it we can see). Also, I’ll use this post to remind everyone again that nothing in Trump’s possession is classified or can ever be considered classified (or top secret or anything else).
Twitter booted Sperry from the site within a short time of his August 9 tweet (very soon after the Mar-a-Lago) raid, saying that there was speculation that the FBI conducted the raid to grab copies of documents related to the Russia Hoax. Despite the ban, Sperry is continuing to investigate and, with the help of friends, disseminating the results of his investigations.
This time around, Sperry has noticed some very strange anomalies in the available portions of the heavily redacted affidavit that purports to justify raiding the property of a former United States president:
https://twitter.com/RCInvestigates/status/1563651102700355585more
https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2022/08/more_problems_emerge_with_the_maralago_affidavit.html
