Article references NYT and Politico. Not exactly great sources for objective news.
Despite Turtle's defeatist attitude, I wouldn't write off AZ, GA, and PA just yet. A lot economic data to hit the news cycles between now and early November.
Well, the NYT is nothing I ever read and accept as gospel.
But I looked around and the story was being covered pretty thoroughly.
The dispute from what I can read is that the times hinted that this was due to money troubles.
That, from what I can tell, is what the NRSC is disputing.
They pulled the ads from the battleground states to use it other places.
They've also already spent a lot of money.
The NRSC disputes that they are cutting funding.
They've never said they didn't cut in the states mentioned in the OP.
Of course, some here don't get the difference as it doesn't fit the narrative.
Chris Hartline keeps denying things...but he'll never say they didn't pull adds in the state.
Of course this is "fake news", as I said, everyone is publishing it.
Then you have Fox reporting that:
FIRST ON FOX – The National Republican Senatorial Committee (NRSC) Friday is releasing new ads in Wisconsin and Arizona for a total of more than $2.2 million in spending days after other canceled ads led to media stories about alleged fundraising issues.
So they seem to say the ads were canceled.
I guess they rate with the NYT.
