Author Topic: Here’s how the Marine Corps should have approached stand-in forces  (Read 226 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline rangerrebew

  • TBR Contributor
  • *****
  • Posts: 165,075
Here’s how the Marine Corps should have approached stand-in forces
By Brig. Gen. Jerry C. McAbee (Retired)
 Aug 14, 06:09 PM


“We have been here before,” Gen. David Berger wrote in his forward to “A Concept for Stand-in Forces,” in December 2021.

These five words, the first sentence of the preamble for the development of stand-in forces, give the false impression that the Marine Corps effectively would address the practical difficulties of adding the new capability.


Left unsaid is the inconvenient truth that historically sound and proven processes would be tossed aside in the blind rush to stand up an unproven, experimental capability.

Marine Corps force structure and required equipment would be cut dangerously to pay for stand-in forces.

Regardless, the Marine Corps “has been here before” when it comes to the seamless and non-injurious fielding of new capabilities, the best example being Marine defense battalions.

https://www.militarytimes.com/opinion/commentary/2022/08/14/heres-how-the-marine-corps-should-have-approached-stand-in-forces/
« Last Edit: August 15, 2022, 12:42:17 pm by rangerrebew »
Would you be willing to fight and die for multiculturalism?  Would you put your life on the line for “Diversity, Inclusion, and Equity” (DIE); “Environmental, Social, and corporate Governance” (ESG); or other Marxist worldviews?  Would you go to war to preserve the right of delusional men to use women’s restrooms and dominate women’s sports?  Would you fight for any government that hunts down and imprisons J6 protesters as political hostages but celebrates Antifa and Black Lives Matter rioters who cause physical injury and property damage?

J.B. Shurk