Left’s climate projections yield worst case consequences for needed energy
By Larry Bell |July 15th, 2022|Climate
We are already witnessing disastrous economic and social consequences of energy policies premised upon precautionary “worst case” climate model projections that leading scientific contributors to the U.N.’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) now admit are running far too hot.
As reported in the prestigious journal Nature, the latest round of more than 50 of the newest simulations assessed by the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project, phase 6 (CMIP6) are based upon myriad complex, poorly understood influences, interrelationships, and rough statistical “garbage in-garbage out” assumptions.
Titled “Climate simulations: recognize the ‘hot model’ problem,” the May article emphasizes: “Earth is a complicated system of interconnected oceans, land, ice and atmosphere, and no computer model could ever simulate every aspect of it exactly.”
https://www.cfact.org/2022/07/15/lefts-climate-projections-yield-worst-case-consequences-for-needed-energy/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=lefts-climate-projections-yield-worst-case-consequences-for-needed-energy#iLightbox[gallery40719]/0
